will change to a Corvette
#27
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by th1rd3y3
While you're waiting you can also get in line for the charriot of christ himself because that's about as realistic as waiting for the return of those cars.
#28
Mentalhealth is overrated
the RX8 and Vette are two different cars aimed at two different markets. I don't think they should be compared to each other. In Canada, you need about 85 large for a Vette and only $40,000 for an RX8....big difference.
I think the only people that have problems with the RX8 are the people that want it to be something it isn't. I bought the car fully knowing what I was buying and was perfectly happy with it.
I think the only people that have problems with the RX8 are the people that want it to be something it isn't. I bought the car fully knowing what I was buying and was perfectly happy with it.
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roaddemon
Corvette is a GM. I'll never buy one just for that fact. I want a car I can rely on.
Another thing is corvettes even newer C6's are sometimes like mustangs, nowdays you see em everywhere. Dont get me wrong C6 vettes are very nice cars and although priced more than an 8, its still a pretty good price for what you get.
Peace
#31
My Rex goes to 11!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
I have no Idea what you are talking about cuz the new supra and nsx are 3 years away and the 7 will probably come next. I'd take a used nsx/supra over a vette anyday.
why wait when you can get a c6 now, thats all the guy wants. no shame in that.
#32
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dinhx8
then in another 5 years there will be another car, then in 2 another one then in 2019 there will be an rx10 with 1000 hp that gets 40 mpg...
why wait when you can get a c6 now, thats all the guy wants. no shame in that.
why wait when you can get a c6 now, thats all the guy wants. no shame in that.
Last edited by DARKMAZ8; 08-16-2005 at 11:30 AM.
#34
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
It's been out for over two years, that isn't young as far as the tuner market goes... If the aftermarkets parts market for the RX-8 isn't booming now, it never will be. That's not to say there won't be more and better products for the 8 coming out, it's just not going to be like many other cars that are more popular with the tuner crowd.
The real tuners such as the ones that live overseas and such dig the 8 and love the rotary and that's plenty good enough for me. I am optimistic about the future of the renesis, any true car lover should be as competition only makes things that much better for the consumer.
#35
My Rex goes to 11!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
you're right no shame in that at all. But I suspect that he posted because he wanted to hear opinions from others. My opinion is that I would rather have a 2000 NSX than a vette. It's more reliable, better mpg, less common, better handling and does mid to low 13's.
cool- I'm not sure the 2000 nsx is better handling than the c6 though is it?
I'm also not sure a 5-6 year old car is more reliable than a brand new one with warranty. Also, i think he wanted that power and torque feel that only 400 horses can get you.
#36
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dinhx8
cool- I'm not sure the 2000 nsx is better handling than the c6 though is it?
I'm also not sure a 5-6 year old car is more reliable than a brand new one with warranty. Also, i think he wanted that power and torque feel that only 400 horses can get you.
I'm also not sure a 5-6 year old car is more reliable than a brand new one with warranty. Also, i think he wanted that power and torque feel that only 400 horses can get you.
#38
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zipgun
Tho GM have come a long way in terms of build quality etc.. your right not really up to par with mazda or japanese autos in general. But much better than the old days.
Peace
Peace
2005 JD Power Initial Quality Study (1st 6 months of service):
Chevrolet = 127 problems/100 cars (4 other GM brands did better and 2 brands did worse)
Mazda = 149 (this is worse)
2005 JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study (36 months of service)
Chevrolet = 232 (2 other GM nameplates did better and 4 other did barely worse. GM as a whole outperformed all Japanese companies as a whole except Toyota and Honda and all but 2 Euro companies)
Mazda = 252
Now it is time for the closed minded know it alls to give your excuses.
#39
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter Sawko
I'm surprised by all of the replies!
#40
My Rex goes to 11!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
i respect your opinion, but i don't think he wan'ts an nsx or have to worry about comp teching anything...
#41
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ahahahaha....I know but Maybe he doesn't....lol BTW how do you know what he wants .
Maybe If I get an even bigger picture than he will want the nsx.....let's see.
Maybe If I get an even bigger picture than he will want the nsx.....let's see.
#43
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
The NSX is a true Mid engine sports car. It is the most reliable sports car ever produced.
1. Porsche 911
2. Honda S2000
3. Chevrolet Corvette
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
It's all about power to weight my friend. the NSX is lighter and more aerodynamic.
Car............................Power............We ight.....................Power/Weight
2005 Vette...............400 hp............3179 lbs...................0.126 (bigger is better)
2005 NSX.................290 hp.............3153 lbs..................0.092 (27% worse)
2006 Z06 Vette.........505 hp...........3132 lbs...................0.161
The Z06 is still lower cost than an NSX.
Basically everything you have said is false.
#44
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by babylou
Really? Because according to JD Power's 2005 Vehicle Dependability Study (36 months of service) the 3 most reliable cars in the same class as the NSX are:
1. Porsche 911
2. Honda S2000
3. Chevrolet Corvette
Power/Weight don't mean squat in handling or braking but I will go ahead with your bit:
Car............................Power............We ight.....................Power/Weight
2005 Vette...............400 hp............3179 lbs...................0.126 (bigger is better)
2005 NSX.................290 hp.............3153 lbs..................0.092 (27% worse)
2006 Z06 Vette.........505 hp...........3132 lbs...................0.161
The Z06 is still lower cost than an NSX.
Basically everything you have said is false.
1. Porsche 911
2. Honda S2000
3. Chevrolet Corvette
Power/Weight don't mean squat in handling or braking but I will go ahead with your bit:
Car............................Power............We ight.....................Power/Weight
2005 Vette...............400 hp............3179 lbs...................0.126 (bigger is better)
2005 NSX.................290 hp.............3153 lbs..................0.092 (27% worse)
2006 Z06 Vette.........505 hp...........3132 lbs...................0.161
The Z06 is still lower cost than an NSX.
Basically everything you have said is false.
You have to be outta your mind to think that JD powers is accurate. As far as weight you got me there but vettes come in a heavy convertable trim aswell. In any event the NSX is the better car. The new vette is a dissapointment where looks are concerned. just look at the rear end...wtf was GM thinking. I'll gladly take the c5 over it any day. Sure 500hp would be great but I like a car that has usable power. For everyday use the NSX wins hands down.
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
You have to be outta your mind to think that JD powers is accurate. As far as weight you got me there but vettes come in a heavy convertable trim aswell. In any event the NSX is the better car. The new vette is a dissapointment where looks are concerned. just look at the rear end...wtf was GM thinking. I'll gladly take the c5 over it any day. Sure 500hp would be great but I like a car that has usable power. For everyday use the NSX wins hands down.
#46
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AbusiveWombat
Maybe you can explain why the NSX is the better car.
#47
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
No problem, The 2001 NSX handles better, does a 12.9 stock in the 1/4 mile(as tested in C&D), Gets better gas mileage, more reliable, looks better, better interior, I could go on. Search google if you don't believe.
Car..............EPA Fuel Efficiency Rating
NSX..............17/24 mpg
Vette............18/28 mpg
R&T lists the NSX 1/4 @ 13.4 s. I did a bit of googling and found that the NSX 1/4's consistently in the 13's.
Also while googling I discovered the Vette Cd is 0.28 whereas the NSX is 0.30. Another one of your lies exposed!
I see you are gonna stick with the more reliable lie also. Not surprising.
Please go on.
Last edited by babylou; 08-16-2005 at 03:36 PM.
#48
05 STi/05 Titan
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
I have no Idea what you are talking about cuz the new supra and nsx are 3 years away and the 7 will probably come next. I'd take a used nsx/supra over a vette anyday.
#49
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by babylou
Are you a patholgical liar or just an idiot? I think both.
Car..............EPA Fuel Efficiency Rating
NSX..............17/24 mpg
Vette............18/28 mpg
R&T lists the NSX 1/4 @ 13.4 s. I did a bit of googling and found that the NSX 1/4's consistently in the 13's.
Also while googling I discovered the Vette Cd is 0.28 whereas the NSX is 0.30. Another one of your lies exposed!
I see you are gonna stick with the more reliable lie also. Not surprising.
Please go on.
Car..............EPA Fuel Efficiency Rating
NSX..............17/24 mpg
Vette............18/28 mpg
R&T lists the NSX 1/4 @ 13.4 s. I did a bit of googling and found that the NSX 1/4's consistently in the 13's.
Also while googling I discovered the Vette Cd is 0.28 whereas the NSX is 0.30. Another one of your lies exposed!
I see you are gonna stick with the more reliable lie also. Not surprising.
Please go on.
You believe what you want but the NSX is better :p
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The City of Angels (...yeah, right)
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I feel you, babylou.
Unfortunately, some folks are just ignorant.
DARKMAZ8, instead of saying the NSX is better, why don't you just say YOU like it better. In the meantime, wipe all that egg off your face.
Unfortunately, some folks are just ignorant.
DARKMAZ8, instead of saying the NSX is better, why don't you just say YOU like it better. In the meantime, wipe all that egg off your face.