Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4381355)
Ok why not:
1==it will not happen--but drivers seat in the center 2- 8 speed dual clutch transmission ( a good one) 3- better ignition system 4- better cooling ( coolant and oil) systems--aux electric water pump 5- 2+2 config 6- wgt as mentioned 7- good visibility 8- better audio and rear view mirror 9-real gauges 10 central tach with digital speedometer 11- a 10 sec 0-100 mph performance level. 12--comes with great tires. 13- easy access oil filter/engine etc. 14- easy access to sparkplugs--or laser sparkplugs:) to tell you the truth if they would drop a small 3 rotor into the R3 ( get it?), for me it would be perfect and I would pay in the low 40's for it. It would have t be 1+2. Are you getting old Denny? |
yes--i am! Lol --damn! I guess what I meant was I like the suicide doors........
|
Originally Posted by 8 Maniac
(Post 4380950)
That wont happen without aftermarket tuning/modifications. E85 is great for those willing to take on the project themselves. For a production car like this, it doesn't make sense. E85 is a cheap alternative compared to racing fuel, but can be much more expensive than regular pump gas. E85 requires a lot more fuel in order to hit those numbers, so efficiency goes down quite a bit. Also, it can be a bit difficult at times to find E85, so that would probably impact sales numbers as well. People don't like to be inconvenienced.
I really only see E85 as a viable fuel for (production) sports cars if it's intended for a very low volume production run or added to vehicles after the fact. I think its nice to be able to get the same performance from E-85 and be environmentally friendly. Especially since people don't want no electronic motor assist hybrid type (added weight) or ugly prius hybrid shaped vehicle. Flex Fuel vehicles are more advanced since when they first came out. I say its very possible. Another thing that is great is the ability to mix any ratio of E-85 + Gas. We'd pass emissions with no problems. Especially with this new Super Catalyze that was mentioned. I believe engines that are built for Flex Fuel are said to be more "corrosion resistant", I don't know howthat would be a plus to a Flex Rotary design but most likely a plus, no? |
wishlist:
less boy racer. more panty dropper. basically a rotary cayman for under 40k. http://media.caranddriver.com/images...-s-787x481.jpg http://media.caranddriver.com/images...-s-787x481.jpg |
Mazda said it would have a 1.6 N/A rotary with about 300hp. Cost about the same as the 370Z and weigh about the same as a GT86
All this sounds perfect to me. going from the above Mazda's target is the 370z |
This is easy. Less is more!
-Nice flowing body (so far I like the Kodo designs) -2 doors -Nice & simple interior (cloth seats available on all models), driver/driving focused -1.6L 300Hp -6 speed manual The more gadgets you put in, the more stuff that breaks and costs you money. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands