Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Turbo+supercharged!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #1  
More_Revs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: NE Wisconsin
Turbo+supercharged!

Don't think this a a repost since I couldn't find it, but even if it is, since this is so cool, to heck with it...

Check this out http://www.technologynewsdaily.com/node/6409

170ps from a 1.4L...and the fuel economy...
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
steven000e's Avatar
I will forever miss my 8!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Northern Kentucky / Cincinnati
wow... that is very cool!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #3  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
I read about that.

Maintaince and longivity nightmare?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 04:23 AM
  #4  
rotaryPilot's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Europe - Greece
here in Greece we have many 1.4 super+turbo charged. It is the Golf 1.4 GT. Name power is 170bhp but actual power is about 187bwp measured in dyno. It is not so economical as the VW says. If you push it then you get 15-16Lt per 100Km which is far away from 7lt per 100Km that VW announces. Moreover, there have been some issues of reliability and some engines where replaced. But not so many. In addition, it is heard that it also consumes some oil.

So Things are not so ideal as presented.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #5  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
That's why I am waiting on this technology.

Does not appear to be dependable at this time.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #6  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by rotaryPilot
here in Greece we have many 1.4 super+turbo charged. It is the Golf 1.4 GT. Name power is 170bhp but actual power is about 187bwp measured in dyno. It is not so economical as the VW says. If you push it then you get 15-16Lt per 100Km which is far away from 7lt per 100Km that VW announces. Moreover, there have been some issues of reliability and some engines where replaced. But not so many. In addition, it is heard that it also consumes some oil.

So Things are not so ideal as presented.
so you're saying it's kinda like an RX-8...
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
that is cool
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #8  
mike1324a's Avatar
Need'd a Turbo
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ajax
so you're saying it's kinda like an RX-8...
HAHA I was thinking the same thing.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #9  
H8SUVS's Avatar
Cubicle Monkey
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: A Whales Vagina
Originally Posted by Ajax
so you're saying it's kinda like an RX-8...

^
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #10  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mike1324a
HAHA I was thinking the same thing.
HAHA. Me too, except the power part. Had he said it's stated as having 187hp but really only has 170, then it would match the RX8 perfectly. HEHE
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #11  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Damn you were reading my mind!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #12  
ricky356's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
you know im new here and a couple of months back i asked about this and everyone flamed me for it. but it makes sense....supercharger for low end, turbo for high end. mix the two right and your good to go. so for all of you who flamed me it looks like you just cant think out side the box.

rick
Reply



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.