|
well im just saying you should get your facts straight when it comes to rotaries.
|
4 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
its amazing... only a few of your so-called "rotor heads" chose a real rotary old school car... rotor heads my ass! LMAO!
This beauty had a 13-B 130hp , 4 wheel disc brakes. Power windows and wood dash. And could corner. It was Mazdas top touring car in the day. What did you expect from 1976? Or I would love to have a 1974 Mazda RX-4,it is a tough decision as to which one I would pick ,given the choice of the 2. I have owned both and love them both. |
1 Attachment(s)
I'd like to rebuild one of these one day. Late 70s 240/280 Datsun Z:
https://www.rx8club.com/attachment.p...id=79445&stc=1 |
Originally Posted by Easy_E1
Hmmmm,,,I want a 1976 Mazda RX-5 (Cosmo)
This beauty had a 13-B 130hp , 4 wheel disc brakes. Power windows and wood dash. And could corner. It was Mazdas top touring car in the day. What did you expect from 1976? Or I would love to have a 1974 Mazda RX-4,it is a tough decision as to which one I would pick ,given the choice of the 2. I have owned both and love them both. |
Originally Posted by EyeBall Fixer...(o)(x)
Old School Rotary is somewhat like Military Intelligence....
... an Oxymoron. Rotary cars weren't really worth a crap until 1993 and the dual turbo... OK, flame me... just my opinion And lets see. The cooling system on the FD couldn't even handle the car when stock. How is this a good thing? I'd say the FD isn't really worth a crap. But, "with a few mods"...it can be a very good car. Thats odd! I've never heard of the SA/FB and FC cooling systems not being adequate when the car is stock! Gosh! Imagine that. Reliable and FD.....the true oxymoron. |
66 mustang
k model.. beers:beer: |
Originally Posted by AdRoCK3217
First of all, the TWIN turbo on the FD (dual and twin are 2 completely different systems, if you want to spread your opinion, try to at least state facts, and maybe make your opinion *correct*, mmk?) was a PEICE OF SHIT.
I'm not trying to "spread" anything. Like everyone else here I am only sharing my thoughts. If you choose to disagree with "my opnion"... thats fine, I don't really care. http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/6...pplause8fu.gif Dual Turbo...? Twin Turbo...? You know what I mean. As for facts... it's "piece" of shit... not "PEICE" OF SHIT... http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/3159/356ho.gif http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/1886/ypeace7pi.gif Peace http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/1886/ypeace7pi.gif *** Edit *** Hey AdRoCK3217, I just read some of your posts over at RX7club. I've come to the conclusion that you're a smart-ass know-it-all who doesn't pass on a chance to spread your wealth of self-proclaimed knowledge. I'm not impressed. Sorry for the Jack, I'm done now. |
Originally Posted by EyeBall Fixer...(o)(x)
|
Originally Posted by limepro
/agree this is my favorite car for looks power and history ever since i was like 4 and my father had a model of it and 20 years later im still loving and desiring it
real 427 Cobra... Out of my league! |
http://www.point-cars.com/files/CHARGER/pss_hi.jpg
Dodge Charger http://www.ryanwright.com/delorean/ext13.jpg DMC DeLorean http://alex.carpent.free.fr/Lotus%20Esprit.jpg Lotus Esprit https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...e/63_vette.jpg C2 and C3 'vettes https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped.../Ford_GT40.jpg Ford GT40 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...esenberg_J.jpg Duesenberg |
Originally Posted by AdRoCK3217
First of all, the TWIN turbo on the FD (dual and twin are 2 completely different systems, if you want to spread your opinion, try to at least state facts, and maybe make your opinion *correct*, mmk?) was a PEICE OF SHIT. The turbos last about 1/2 as long as the engine, and lacking the current(1992)-age technology of ball-bearing, were a complete waste of time.
And lets see. The cooling system on the FD couldn't even handle the car when stock. How is this a good thing? I'd say the FD isn't really worth a crap. But, "with a few mods"...it can be a very good car. Thats odd! I've never heard of the SA/FB and FC cooling systems not being adequate when the car is stock! Gosh! Imagine that. Reliable and FD.....the true oxymoron. |
I always thought the Renault R4 Turbo was pretty cool. Mechanically, junk; but pretty cool.
And in its day...The GLH Turbo (Dodge Omni) was pretty quick. |
rx-2 and rx-3 coupe's
moder calssic: fc and eunos cosmo 20b eccs |
Originally Posted by AdRoCK3217
First of all, the TWIN turbo on the FD (dual and twin are 2 completely different systems, if you want to spread your opinion, try to at least state facts, and maybe make your opinion *correct*, mmk?) was a PEICE OF SHIT. The turbos last about 1/2 as long as the engine, and lacking the current(1992)-age technology of ball-bearing, were a complete waste of time.
And lets see. The cooling system on the FD couldn't even handle the car when stock. How is this a good thing? I'd say the FD isn't really worth a crap. But, "with a few mods"...it can be a very good car. Thats odd! I've never heard of the SA/FB and FC cooling systems not being adequate when the car is stock! Gosh! Imagine that. Reliable and FD.....the true oxymoron. do you own a civic? |
I'm with the, there are too many to list...but I'll pick a few that come to mind:
http://www.universalautosalesandclas...teLeftSide.jpg http://www.geocities.com/chevycorvet...e_stingray.jpg http://www.avonhill.com/thumbnails/c...iac_GTO_1.jpeg |
'69 Yenko Camaro.
427-cubic inch iron-block, cam-in-block, overhead valve V8 making 425 hp despite relying on a giant fuel-leak called a "four-barrel carburetor" for induction I've posted this before in the muscle car thread but this is my favorite classic. http://www.us-car-history.de/markena...ofrontside.jpg |
Originally Posted by EyeBall Fixer...(o)(x)
Try convincing the FD owners over at the rx7club of this...
|
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
I have never seen so many miss information in one post!
do you own a civic? |
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
they know the cooling and twins are crap. why do you think they switch ti a single or BNR turbos, free up the exhuast, get an aftermarket radiator, and new ast?
I am not the voice of experience when it comes to the FD/FC series... My 93 Black on Black MT RX7 was the 1st year of it's model. If a design flaw was going to show up, it would have done so with mine. I drove it hard for 70K miles with NO major issues. It's still running around town with it's 4th owner... and still stock. The only problems I ever had with it was when I broke something. I have never owned an FD or an FC... I've never owned a Corvair, a Pinto or a Datsun... I don't eat beets... Why? I don't like them! Yet you persist in trying to change my mind... It ain't going to happen. I know what I like and what I don't like... You're a fan of the FD/FC's, that's your choice. Good for you. It's time to move forward and stop Jacking this thread. If you want to continue this argument, I suggest you start your own thread about how your FD's/FC's are best... Bye-Bye |
Originally Posted by snizzle
'69 Yenko Camaro.
427-cubic inch iron-block, cam-in-block, overhead valve V8 making 425 hp despite relying on a giant fuel-leak called a "four-barrel carburetor" for induction I've posted this before in the muscle car thread but this is my favorite classic. http://www.us-car-history.de/markena...ofrontside.jpg |
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
I have never seen so many miss information in one post!
do you own a civic? Let's see.
Originally Posted by adrock3217
First of all, the TWIN turbo on the FD (dual and twin are 2 completely different systems, if you want to spread your opinion, try to at least state facts, and maybe make your opinion *correct*, mmk?) was a PEICE OF SHIT. The turbos last about 1/2 as long as the engine, and lacking the current(1992)-age technology of ball-bearing, were a complete waste of time.
And lets see. The cooling system on the FD couldn't even handle the car when stock. How is this a good thing? I'd say the FD isn't really worth a crap. But, "with a few mods"...it can be a very good car. Thats odd! I've never heard of the SA/FB and FC cooling systems not being adequate when the car is stock! Gosh! Imagine that. Reliable and FD.....the true oxymoron. Yes, the coolant system is really bad, and the FD has been known to overheat even when stock, under spirited driving conditions. And no, I've never heard of an SA/FB or FC cooling system being inadequate when the car is stock. I don't see any misinformation? |
Lamborghini Miura SV
http://www.s-e-a.de/img/cars/1971-la...ini-miura2.jpg Porsche 911 Carrera RS http://www.abmotor.pt/imgveiculos/1582521.jpg BMW 3.0 CSi http://www.bmw2002repair.com/images/3.0cs.jpg |
Originally Posted by AdRoCK3217
Mind telling me where I spread misinformation? It's all correct to my knowledge. Rather then posting this comment, and then coming back with a childish remark as "do you own a civic?", why not prove me wrong, hmm?
Start your own thread concerning your opinions... Have you considered taking your arguments back to the appropriate club? They seem to appreciate / tolerate your knowledge over there. Not many here will miss you. |
Originally Posted by AdRoCK3217
Mind telling me where I spread misinformation? It's all correct to my knowledge. Rather then posting this comment, and then coming back with a childish remark as "do you own a civic?", why not prove me wrong, hmm?
Let's see. Twin and dual are 2 completely different things. Twin are 2 things working together, while dual are seperate..and yes, the "average" FD's turbo's tend to last about 1/2 as long as the engine, needing to be rebuilt..this is not "fact", but merely what I've seen and been told by many an FD owner... Yes, the coolant system is really bad, and the FD has been known to overheat even when stock, under spirited driving conditions. And no, I've never heard of an SA/FB or FC cooling system being inadequate when the car is stock. I don't see any misinformation? 12 years ownig fd's ( and almost all rotary cars in my life time), if you dont mess with the boost you dont fry the turbos as simple as that my current fd has 6 years at 14 psi and im supouse to belive there crap? Cooling? in my country its always in the upper 90's againg if you up the boost then you have cooling problems, it is a demanding car you got to take care of it, most cars that blow are not very well taken care of. sorry about the civic coment, but if you say a car is not worth a crap what dit you spect? |
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
they know the cooling and twins are crap. why do you think they switch ti a single or BNR turbos, free up the exhuast, get an aftermarket radiator, and new ast?
I have the original sat on my car for 6 years, but they do suck, my brothers blew up in a track day :hahano: |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands