RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   General Automotive (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/)
-   -   Scion FR-S dyno video (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/scion-fr-s-dyno-video-231881/)

shazy 04-10-2012 10:13 PM

Scion FR-S dyno video
 
173HP to the wheels, the same as the rx-8 :(


cfm251 04-10-2012 10:39 PM

not bad...it will have a ton more aftermarket support than the rx8 though thats for sure.

8 Maniac 04-10-2012 10:45 PM

That's a little lower than I would expect/hope to get from an MT 8 but not too far off. I think 180-190 isn't too far fetched for a healthy 8.

The torque is a bigger difference. It looks to have a higher peak torque and lower at lower rpms. Knowing peak numbers is fun and all... but a graph would have been WAY more useful to see.

monchie 04-10-2012 10:48 PM

Not into Scions...even if it has more horsepower than the rx8.

8 Maniac 04-10-2012 11:38 PM

I dont really care whose name is on it. If it meets my needs and has the looks and performance I want, I don't care about the name on it. I definitely don't like scions, but that's because I haven't been a fan of the products or their advertising. If they produce a quality car that suits what I'm looking for, I wont just rule it out because of a name.

Mazmart 04-11-2012 07:17 AM

I guarantee the FRS has much smaller gearbox and differential than the 8 much more akin the those in the MX-5, hence some of the other parts in the equation of hp and torque comparisons at a chassis dyno between the RX-8 and FRS.

I think I should put a renesis in an FRS :).

Paul.

scorcherjf 04-12-2012 03:37 PM

The accompanying dyno graph is here:
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...477-118670.jpg

TeamRX8 04-12-2012 08:28 PM

If you plot that out against the gearing it will be apparent why the reported acceleration times are slower than an RX8, one lone piece of the puzzle does not a picture paint ....

Velocity 04-14-2012 12:39 AM

With similar HP and acceleration as the RX-8, it's nice to see MPG ratings up to 25city/34hwy. I never broke 20mpg in my 8, even with the most conservative highway driving. It's going to be hard to beat the driving experience of an 8, but reviews are looking promising...

scorcherjf 04-18-2012 10:28 AM

I think some of the reviews pointed out that the 0-60 took longer than anticipated because 2nd gear topped out at 59mph and they had to shift to 3rd. The quarter mile times more or less match the RX-8's...

Originally Posted by TeamRX8 (Post 4237935)
If you plot that out against the gearing it will be apparent why the reported acceleration times are slower than an RX8, one lone piece of the puzzle does not a picture paint ....


bulletproof21 04-18-2012 02:52 PM

^good point. That was the reason 2nd gen rx-8 were slower 0-60. Had to shift to third with the shorter gearing.

neit_jnf 04-25-2012 12:00 PM

What's with that 20 lb-ft torque dip at 4000rpm?

Also, apart from the differences in weight and gearing, there's the extra 2000 rpm band RX-8's have.

1.3_LittersOfFurry 04-25-2012 01:33 PM

Meh, not impressed. Scions.... kid cars... I rather be caught in a 1996 v6 Mustang that blows smoke and needs a paint job...

Grace_Excel 04-25-2012 03:34 PM

Well, here's the FR-S with the TOYOTA V8 NASCAR engine. Looks sloppy, at the moment, as a drift car.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands