Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Saturn Redline

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Saturn Redline

Has anyone test drove one of these yet or consider buying one? I've read the article on c&d it gave the srt-4 an run for its money. I really can't say much about the looks but the performance isn't bad for a 20k ride.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 01:52 PM
  #2  
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
Not anymore
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
This car looks like some serious bang-for-the-buck. I smell awesome aftermarket support for the ION Redline.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 02:11 PM
  #3  
doubleohsmurf's Avatar
USAF
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Hurlburt Air Field FL, Richland WA, Spokane WA
Its a decent looking car IMO...

Specs
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #4  
Redlinin 8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: ny
supposedly the cars gearing is bad and it was a disapointment
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 12:06 AM
  #5  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
yea it was .3 second slower than the srt-4 on both quarter mile and 0-60. I would think since its a sced it wouldve ran better 0-60 time than the srt-4.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #6  
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Originally Posted by IZoomZoomI
yea it was .3 second slower than the srt-4 on both quarter mile and 0-60. I would think since its a sced it wouldve ran better 0-60 time than the srt-4.
It does have less power overall than the Dodge does, so the fact that it's slower is not all that surprising. I think that the Ion Redline is going to be quite a nice car for the money, especially with regards to performance. The performance sport compact scene looks to be getting better and better every year. Thumbs up to GM on this one.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 11:48 AM
  #7  
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by IZoomZoomI
yea it was .3 second slower than the srt-4 on both quarter mile and 0-60. I would think since its a sced it wouldve ran better 0-60 time than the srt-4.
The Redline has "on paper" 30 less horsepower. I say "on paper" because the SRT has been known to dyno AT the wheels 225-230 so it's probably got closer to 40+ hp more.

Also, turbocharged engines tend to have a broader power band with a big torque peak early in the rpms (~3000) followed by a slow tapper in torque. This leads to a broad flat horsepower band. Where as a supercharger tends to give a linear power increase. All this means that the SRT4 should be much faster...if it was only 0.3 seconds behind in the 1/4 then I'd say it's doing pretty good.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
KC_Prelude's Avatar
sittin' sidewayz
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
R&T compared them this month and here's the bottom line

They were about dead even in the points, price and fuel economy.

Dodge is faster (obviously) but much more harsh suspension and poorly balanced although the LSD helps it out (saturn doesn't have one), its louder than crap (no mufflers)

Saturn handles much better, smoother ride, controllable with the throttle, better brake feel, uncomfortable interior despite "recaro" seats, guage cluster in terrible center position (this alone would **** me off enough not to want one)

The comparison is actually strikingly similar to the 350z vs RX-8 debate. Do you want more power or better handling? Looks are subjective but I think they both look like ***. Ion is slightly more interesting looking because its new and has a better wing and front end.

The Ion seems like it would be the better base to tune. All you have to do is give it more power and it will womp the dodge.

I still would never consider either of them to be good cars. At the end of the day the FWD cripples both of them. You could get one hell of an FD or supra for $20,000 and not look like a wannabe white trash ricer but some kids just never learn.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #9  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by AbusiveWombat
The Redline has "on paper" 30 less horsepower. I say "on paper" because the SRT has been known to dyno AT the wheels 225-230 so it's probably got closer to 40+ hp more.

Also, turbocharged engines tend to have a broader power band with a big torque peak early in the rpms (~3000) followed by a slow tapper in torque. This leads to a broad flat horsepower band. Where as a supercharger tends to give a linear power increase. All this means that the SRT4 should be much faster...if it was only 0.3 seconds behind in the 1/4 then I'd say it's doing pretty good.
Nice, thanks for the clarification.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
Feb 27, 2020 08:39 AM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
OfficerFarva
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
16
Dec 5, 2015 10:53 AM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:53 PM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.