RX 8 vs. S2000 ???
#6
Pistons.. What are those?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami and Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honda S200
Curb Weight 2835
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 4
Base Engine Size: 2.2 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4
Horsepower: 240 hp
Max Horsepower: 7800 rpm
Torque: 162 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 6500 rpm
Drive Type: RWD
RX8
Base Engine Size: 1.3 liters
Base Engine Type: Rotary
Horsepower: 238 hp
Max Horsepower: 8500 rpm
Torque: 159 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 5500 rpm
Drive Type: RWD
I think it would be very damn Close!!!
Curb Weight 2835
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 4
Base Engine Size: 2.2 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4
Horsepower: 240 hp
Max Horsepower: 7800 rpm
Torque: 162 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 6500 rpm
Drive Type: RWD
RX8
Base Engine Size: 1.3 liters
Base Engine Type: Rotary
Horsepower: 238 hp
Max Horsepower: 8500 rpm
Torque: 159 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 5500 rpm
Drive Type: RWD
I think it would be very damn Close!!!
#10
Registered
As almost any drag racer can attest, with cars that are fairly close the race will absolutely be won or lost at the starting line. In a perfect world with 2 perfect drivers, I'd say the S2000 by a small margin.
#11
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went on a fall foilage drive in my RX-8 following my father and his friend in S2000s (one had CAI, the other had expensive exhaust). I had my mom in the car (probably 150 lbs, which should not make a big difference). As soon as we hit the road we were looking for, they left me in the dust. Pretty soon I could just hear the exhaust in the distance. I then got stuck behind an old woman in an Oldsmobile and they had to wait for me at the end of the drive. I don't know how much of a difference those mods made, but we cannot hang with the S2000.
#15
Rev where did you get those numbers?Ive seen tickets over at nopistons with slips showing 14.3ish to 14.5ish times.Is that the slowest mag publication?Ive personally ripped 2 s2000s already one launch to about 130 mph the other from about a 65mph roll.
Last edited by PoLaK; 01-20-2004 at 09:26 PM.
#17
Stock s2000 also dyno at 206whp and 140trq and are about 2850lbs and they rev to about 8000 (i know you guys rev to 9000) rpms so they have the edge. It still could be a drivers race
Last edited by 1 BAD TIB; 12-12-2003 at 08:20 PM.
#18
Originally posted by WTF no turbo
Rev where did you get those numbers?Ive seen tickets over at nopistons with slips showing 14.3ish to 14.5ish times.Is that the slowest mag publication?Ive personally ripped 2 s2000s already one stoplight launch to about 130 mph the other from about a 65mph roll.
Rev where did you get those numbers?Ive seen tickets over at nopistons with slips showing 14.3ish to 14.5ish times.Is that the slowest mag publication?Ive personally ripped 2 s2000s already one stoplight launch to about 130 mph the other from about a 65mph roll.
On this forum, we have only seen high 14s to mid15s. I think you might be referreing to the Mazda-RotaryNews slips that many doubt because of Mazda's impaired credibility.
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stock to stock, s2000 is DEFINITELY a faster car. i love the rx8 and i own one myself but s2000 is a monster. neither cars are really meant for 1/4 mile though... why not give the evo a look
#21
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
Originally posted by Rotary Soul
stock to stock, s2000 is DEFINITELY a faster car. i love the rx8 and i own one myself but s2000 is a monster. neither cars are really meant for 1/4 mile though... why not give the evo a look
stock to stock, s2000 is DEFINITELY a faster car. i love the rx8 and i own one myself but s2000 is a monster. neither cars are really meant for 1/4 mile though... why not give the evo a look
#22
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
Originally posted by Dookie_Rx-8
hey take off those turbos on the EVO and STi and lets see what happens
hey take off those turbos on the EVO and STi and lets see what happens
#23
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree.
Comparing the EVO and STi to the RX-8 is like comparing turnips and grapefruit. The RX-8 is stock. The others are highly modified niche creatures from there orginal form.
In fact, the RX-8 should not be compare against the s2000 or the 350z. The better comparison a BMW 325.
..... but just in case, would be interesting the test the about against an 8 with the cz ecu adapter...:D
Comparing the EVO and STi to the RX-8 is like comparing turnips and grapefruit. The RX-8 is stock. The others are highly modified niche creatures from there orginal form.
In fact, the RX-8 should not be compare against the s2000 or the 350z. The better comparison a BMW 325.
..... but just in case, would be interesting the test the about against an 8 with the cz ecu adapter...:D
#24
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
Originally posted by Twin 8s!
I disagree.
Comparing the EVO and STi to the RX-8 is like comparing turnips and grapefruit. The RX-8 is stock. The others are highly modified niche creatures from there orginal form.
In fact, the RX-8 should not be compare against the s2000 or the 350z. The better comparison a BMW 325.
..... but just in case, would be interesting the test the about against an 8 with the cz ecu adapter...:D
I disagree.
Comparing the EVO and STi to the RX-8 is like comparing turnips and grapefruit. The RX-8 is stock. The others are highly modified niche creatures from there orginal form.
In fact, the RX-8 should not be compare against the s2000 or the 350z. The better comparison a BMW 325.
..... but just in case, would be interesting the test the about against an 8 with the cz ecu adapter...:D
BTW, can we at least compare the RX-8 to the BMW 330......
#25
Ok heres my take.mazda put more money in the car itself then taking a $13000 4 door family sedan droping in a turbo, hood scoop and some suspension and calling it a rally car.While yes ill agree their fast no doubt,i personally couldnt live with a neon interior.Sti is prolly the best as far as entire package goes but its still a turbo'd up family sedan.Want a race car?Buy a fd or mkIV thats a race car.430 rwhp in my supra in my younger days would laugh at these evos and sti's and i only had about 6k in it.When mods start to really sprout up for the 8 i see 230 to 250 na and 300s fi.Compare apples to apples mazda could have made 8's much faster but at what price point?To rev those tickets were ran by judge not mazda.
Last edited by WTF no turbo; 12-13-2003 at 11:02 AM.