Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

The official Evo X thread

Old Apr 22, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #151  
Steiner's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Ike, I own one of those 11 second Evos running on the stock (ish) turbo. It's an OEM 16G IX turbo tuned for 100 octane. Needless to say, it flies and will pull most Corvettes in a straightaway and around most tracks. My friend's running a similair 100 octane setup on his '05 VIII, minus the aftermarket cams and IX turbo, and he's got track day videos of his ride outdancing, outpulling and outclassing Corvettes all over the place. But the new Zo6 Corvette is in a league of its own - not just against coilovered and big boosted Evos, but against Vipers, M5's, M3's and most everything else people would take to the track nowadys. This one video he has is unbelievable. He's coming out of a corner at Laguna Seca and his 300whp Evo, running KW3 coilovers and R-compounds loses the inside line to bone stock Z06. From there the Z06 takes off in the straightaway with the kind of gusto you'd expect from a 950cc street bike. It was amazing. For the $65k price tag it's even more mind boggling. Now I hate using the Euro trash car shows to support a claim, but these two videos are excellent for anybody who hasn't seen them yet...

http://www.z06zone.com/media-videos/...ear-C6-Z06.avi

http://www.z06zone.com/media-videos/Top-Gear-C6Z06.avi
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #152  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Thread Starter
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Steiner
Ike, I own one of those 11 second Evos running on the stock (ish) turbo. It's an OEM 16G IX turbo tuned for 100 octane. Needless to say, it flies and will pull most Corvettes in a straightaway and around most tracks. My friend's running a similair 100 octane setup on his '05 VIII, minus the aftermarket cams and IX turbo, and he's got track day videos of his ride outdancing, outpulling and outclassing Corvettes all over the place. But the new Zo6 Corvette is in a league of its own - not just against coilovered and big boosted Evos, but against Vipers, M5's, M3's and most everything else people would take to the track nowadys. This one video he has is unbelievable. He's coming out of a corner at Laguna Seca and his 300whp Evo, running KW3 coilovers and R-compounds loses the inside line to bone stock Z06. From there the Z06 takes off in the straightaway with the kind of gusto you'd expect from a 950cc street bike. It was amazing. For the $65k price tag it's even more mind boggling. Now I hate using the Euro trash car shows to support a claim, but these two videos are excellent for anybody who hasn't seen them yet...

http://www.z06zone.com/media-videos/...ear-C6-Z06.avi

http://www.z06zone.com/media-videos/Top-Gear-C6Z06.avi
No doubt the Z06 is in another league and an Evo would need an upgraded turbo and some suspension work to stand a chance with equal drivers.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #153  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Thread Starter
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by mikefrombarrie
How do they test these cars anyway?!?! A "Honda" Nsx faster then a C6 Corvette in a straight line? I don't think so.... Also, they reviewed the corvette and pointed out how bad it is. And then they pick the corvette in another show as the best overall sports car?

Also, the "track" testing that they do is just as bad! They were testing a FWD Audi TT 1.8 and it was faster then the Mazda RX-8?? There is NOWAY that the
RX-8 is slower then the TT 1.8, even in a straight line!

When it comes to "Top gear" don't take their reviews seriously.
The Audi TT was the new one and IIRC it was the 2.0T with the special suspension. There's no reason to believe it's not quicker than an RX-8 around a track...
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #154  
Romancer's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ike
Don't get me wrong, they are impressive cars for the money, but they're hardly automotive nirvana and I'll take an Evo or Elise over a Vette during a trackday every time. And no, a C6 will not smoke my Evo.
Good, then get a C5 Z06 for cheaper.

Good day sir, you lose.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 07:06 PM
  #155  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Blah blah, compare stock cars to modded, blah blah.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #156  
playdoh43's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
ive driven both the C5 and C6 quite a few times, I think people tend to underestimate how well they handle. IMHO, they handle very well.

I think for amature drivers the corvette handles better than a lot of cars including the 350Z because it is very easy to drive fast and it has so much grip. For serious drivers who has the skills to take a car to its limit, the corvette is not so great because its unstable when the tail end breaks loose while the 350Z breaks loose in a linear fashion.

As far as for 90% of the car enthusiasts who dosnt have the ability to drive a car at its limit, id say the corvette would be one of the best handling cars under 50k. Lets face it, most of us will never even come close to taking our car to the limit let alone driving it at its limit consistently
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #157  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Thread Starter
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Romancer
Good, then get a C5 Z06 for cheaper.

Good day sir, you lose.
I don't even know what you're talking about...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 01:10 AM
  #158  
RotaryP7's Avatar
Seriously.. FML..
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Damn, I had to bring this thread back to life..
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 03:47 AM
  #159  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by snizzle
Blah blah, compare stock cars to modded, blah blah.
Right on. Let the Vette be modded equally, then do a comparison. My former 1987 Mitsubishi Starion could walk a stock EVO from a roll all day long. It was pretty well modified, and that car was DEADLY on straightaways, and a stock EVO wouldn't have stood a chance against that car. Although this is true, do you see how ridiculous it sounds to say this? Come on now, No more comparing modded to stock. TY.

Last edited by VikingDJ; Apr 23, 2007 at 03:55 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #160  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 3
From: Delaware, USA
WTF! Why are we talking about Corvette's? I know we're all bored sitting around waiting for the Evo X to come out, but seriously. They're not even close to being in the same price range or even the same kind of car.

j00 n00bs!1!!11! Teh sp@ce shutt1e h@s 8 mi11ion hp!11!11 iT w00d pWn j00r c0rv3tte!1!!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #161  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Thread Starter
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
I agree that the modded argument vs. stock can be and usually is lame. I was just trying to point out that a basic C6 Vette is not going to "smoke" an Evo around a track.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #162  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
^ the Evo got smoked by the C6 in that Car & Driver lightening lap, no? Think it was 5 seconds or so.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #163  
playdoh43's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
i love the evo and all, but on the track the vette is in a different league, stock vs stock at least, i dont think its that close at all. the C5 Z06 back in the days was already a faster track car than the evo, the base c6 is a usually tad faster than the C5 Z06. the evo is very respectable as a 30k car vs a 45k car.

modded evo vs vette is a whole different story.

and just a tid bit of unrelated side info, during last years umd spring meet, when the z06 first came out, an old dude brought a brand new bone stock z06 with only 400 some miles on it and pulled 474.3whp on the dynojet.

Last edited by playdoh43; Apr 23, 2007 at 08:20 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 01:43 AM
  #164  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Thread Starter
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by playdoh43
i love the evo and all, but on the track the vette is in a different league, stock vs stock at least, i dont think its that close at all. the C5 Z06 back in the days was already a faster track car than the evo, the base c6 is a usually tad faster than the C5 Z06. the evo is very respectable as a 30k car vs a 45k car.

modded evo vs vette is a whole different story.

and just a tid bit of unrelated side info, during last years umd spring meet, when the z06 first came out, an old dude brought a brand new bone stock z06 with only 400 some miles on it and pulled 474.3whp on the dynojet.

Keep in mind that in other comparos the Evo has turned better lap times than the Carrera S, Cayman S, and the RS4. Yes, the Evo got beat by the Vette in the C&D lightning lap. But that Evo also got beat by the Z which I've never seen happen before and got beat by the Cayman (which was about equal with the Vette) which the Evo was about even with in another track comparo. Also, like I said earlier, the Evo was faseter in Top Gear as well.


Here's an STI special model that's actually slower than a lot of stock Evos around Tsukuba beating the new Z06

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6blkJGyd9U

That is a freakish thing to happen...

Here's a video of stock Evo chasing a C5 Z06 Vette (might be stock or might not)
I could show you lots of these videos but I'm the first to admit that they don't mean a whole lot. Driver skill in any given HPDE group varies wildly. I will say that the Evo takes the wrong line more than a few times and the Vette looked a little shaky once or twice as well.

http://www.mydeo.com/videorequest.as...5079&CID=87107

Here's one just for kicks of the recent lap record on Tsukuba, the last minute is the best part

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS93gfz2TDE

In short, I don't know if the Vette is faster or the Evo is faster stock for stock. It's probably going to come down to the track but one isn't going to "smoke" the other on most tracks on most days. Don't forget, this is just silly bench racing so just have fun with it...
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 04:46 AM
  #165  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ike
In short, I don't know if the Vette is faster or the Evo is faster stock for stock. It's probably going to come down to the track but one isn't going to "smoke" the other on most tracks on most days. Don't forget, this is just silly bench racing so just have fun with it...
Silly bench racing is amusing though. I tell ya, with equal drivers, that track better not have long straightaways on it stock vs stock or it's not gonna be close. I've had some experience with even the 350hp C5 stock vs stock with my STI from a roll. It wasn't pretty. I got SMOKED. A winding track where driver skill means everything, and HP doesn't is where you want to be. In a perfect world, the EVO is just out of it's league overall in performance stock vs stock. This is why people start comparing modded cars to stock. It's the only way to compete, so one must cheat.

Last edited by VikingDJ; Apr 24, 2007 at 04:57 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:47 AM
  #166  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by VikingDJ
In a perfect world, the EVO is just out of it's league overall in performance stock vs stock. This is why people start comparing modded cars to stock. It's the only way to compete, so one must cheat.
Thank you. I'm glad someone agrees with me. People always pull out this card to defend their cars. Hell, we defend our beloved RX8 here when people start bashing it so it's human nature.

Even so, it is a ridiculous comparison. I can see discussing modded vs stock to prove value but other than that it's worthless and irrelevant. Different target audience, different price range, different cars.

Both the Vette and the Evo are fantastic values for the money but neither are perfect.

What does any of this have to do with the Evo X anyway?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 09:20 PM
  #167  
Aipex8's Avatar
X e p i A
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 5
From: Vancouver, WA
^^Nothing. Here, I'll try and get us back on topic:

Saw a new Lancer yesterday in blue. Very eye-catching car, even in non-Evo form, unlike previous Lancers. I can't wait to see the Evo, it's gonna be hot!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #168  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Aipex8
^^Nothing. Here, I'll try and get us back on topic:

Saw a new Lancer yesterday in blue. Very eye-catching car, even in non-Evo form, unlike previous Lancers. I can't wait to see the Evo, it's gonna be hot!
You got that right. The new Lancer looks 1000 times nicer IMO then the past generation. The new EVO is simply gonna be HOT. I never looked at the Lancer and said " this car is gorgeous, but in that one commercial, it caught my eye, and I thought, holy crap, that car looks really nice. Nice job Mitsubishi. It's about time. They have such an amazing piece of engineering in the EVO, now it's time to make it look as nice as it drives. WOO HOO.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #169  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
The regular lancer seems to be a good value too as you can get a loaded GTS with nav for like 22k I think.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 02:19 PM
  #170  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Thread Starter
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
I must say, other than the Evo I never would have considered a Mitsubishi product in the past. I don't look at the regular Lancer with the disdain that I used to and some of the other new models aren't bad. Mitsubishi is doing a pretty good job turning things around and they certainly seem to have a winner on their hands with the new Lancer.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #171  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
lets hope so for mitsu sake, I used to own a evo VII and a 2001 montero and they dint leave a good taste in my mouth, they where allways braking down, but the montero was the worse to the point of needing an engine replacement after less than one year of use and I sold it with bad piston rings
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #172  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
EEEEEE VOOOOOOOOOO Evo Evo

I think I'm going over to the EVO forum and start a RX8 thread and be like IKE!

doh..........
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #173  
Zio's Avatar
Zio
美浜ー先輩??!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, NJ
It actually looks pretty good TBH.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #174  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Deets on the Evo X:
El Linko





Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #175  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 3
From: Delaware, USA
Check it out. The right side tires are different than the left side ones. Probably like that for bettar drifting!1!!!



Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.