Official 2013 Formula 1 Season Discussion
Fingery McDouchephallus's traction control working nicely again. Although if you ignore the fact he's running off in the lead then it was a really good race. 4th, 5th, 6th battle at the end was great!
Registered
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Registered
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Red Bull May Have Invented A Secret New Hybrid Technology
Red Bull May Have Invented A Secret New Hybrid Technology
Red Bull May Have Invented A Secret New Hybrid Technology
Red Bull May Have Invented A Secret New Hybrid Technology
Red Bull May Have Invented A Secret New Hybrid Technology
Red Bull May Have Invented A Secret New Hybrid Technology
It makes sense. Vettel is not capable of wiping the floor with Hamilton, Alonso, Raikkonen and Webber; no way. Speaking of Webber, what level of inequity has been shown to him over time by his team?
Paul.
Paul.
Very interesting, and cool, means of traction control. One of those things that I wonder if it would ever make it into consumer cars. Seems to be predictive of available traction, rather than reactive. Lots more variables in consumer cars, but hardly insurmountable.
Hmm.
Looking at the rules, it appears that the traction control rules are tied to "limiting wheel spin". It will come down to a decision on if that is defining a reactive system or not. If wheel spin is not a component of what is being fed into the traction system, it very well may be successfully argued that it is legal.
It's a very fine line of definition, and I expect 99% of people won't be willing to acknowledge that the difference even exists since the end result is the same. Including F1 officials.
I fully expect that F1 has no idea what he is using and just haven't found it yet. If they knew, they would probably have made a statement by now, either saying that it is legal, or hammering red bull.
Looking at the rules, it appears that the traction control rules are tied to "limiting wheel spin". It will come down to a decision on if that is defining a reactive system or not. If wheel spin is not a component of what is being fed into the traction system, it very well may be successfully argued that it is legal.
It's a very fine line of definition, and I expect 99% of people won't be willing to acknowledge that the difference even exists since the end result is the same. Including F1 officials.
I fully expect that F1 has no idea what he is using and just haven't found it yet. If they knew, they would probably have made a statement by now, either saying that it is legal, or hammering red bull.
Registered
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
It's a reletively tight grouping for P2. I wonder if RB has tuned down the traction control.
The talk about the phenomena has migrated outside of the race community.
Formula 1's Leading Team Has a Big Secret | Autopia | Wired.com
Sad news
BBC Sport - Maria De Villota: F1 reserve driver found dead in Seville
The talk about the phenomena has migrated outside of the race community.
Formula 1's Leading Team Has a Big Secret | Autopia | Wired.com
Sad news
BBC Sport - Maria De Villota: F1 reserve driver found dead in Seville
What's that thing that sounds like **** and costs a lot more than its predecessor?
Here's the answer:
Honda's new Formula 1 engine - GPUpdate.net
Here's the answer:
Honda's new Formula 1 engine - GPUpdate.net



