Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Next-gen tires don't need air...or sidewalls

Old Mar 2, 2007 | 06:01 AM
  #26  
dbright007's Avatar
Book em' Dano
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Smyrna, GA
The name Tweel is teh ghey..
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 10:04 AM
  #27  
globi's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Pretty interesting.
I'm surprised though, that they're not already using this on military or security vehicles.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 11:06 AM
  #28  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Its not ugly, they can just put rubber on the sides, and it'll look like a normal tire. I wonder how the support structure would stand up to everyday use and abuse. Or perhaps they can produce a hybrid of gas inflated/tweel tire. That would make a very very good run flat tire.
________
DEPAKOTE SETTLEMENT UPDATE

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #29  
RedSheDevil's Avatar
.:. causing mischief
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
i saw that last night as well ... seems there is no plan for a sidewall, just the open ugliness
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #30  
mike1324a's Avatar
Need'd a Turbo
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
uglyness is right!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #31  
MP3Guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
I saw these on the "Futurecar" series on the Discovery Channel, with some footage of actual cars running on them. These look like they are far enough in development to go into mass production sooner than you think. The deflection of the sidewebbing used to support the tread on bumps and turns merely looks like what you might think a normal tire does anyway without the fully covered sidewall.

The product looks very plausible. And imagine if everyone got rid of their spare tire. That has a lot of design and performance implications.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #32  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by RedSheDevil
i saw that last night as well ... seems there is no plan for a sidewall, just the open ugliness
If I remember correctly from when I first saw these last year, they have the sidewalls off for demonstration purposes (to show they're not needed), but will put sidewalls on for production wheels.

Personally, I cannot see them leaving them open like that. Aside from the obvious asthetic issues, they'll create unneccesary drag, and be a magnet for debris or snow and water. Can you imagine the effects on the balance of a wheel which has one side filled up with snow?

Just doesn't make sense to leave them off.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #33  
alfy28's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
i have to say, those tires look very JDM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #34  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,651
Likes: 3,517
From: The Dark Side
haha, cops gotta be hating this idea. So much for Spike Strips!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #35  
rglbegl's Avatar
Baned
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 2
From: By a lake
So would it make the contact patch of the tire larger? More tire on the road? And how about sidewall strength? would they be decent as a performance tire?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #36  
flomulgator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
I saw that too. Imagine the windup drag racers would induce.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #37  
RedSheDevil's Avatar
.:. causing mischief
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
If I remember correctly from when I first saw these last year, they have the sidewalls off for demonstration purposes (to show they're not needed), but will put sidewalls on for production wheels.

Personally, I cannot see them leaving them open like that. Aside from the obvious asthetic issues, they'll create unneccesary drag, and be a magnet for debris or snow and water. Can you imagine the effects on the balance of a wheel which has one side filled up with snow?

Just doesn't make sense to leave them off.
gawd i hope so ... and that they give options for the wheel part too!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #38  
lesper4's Avatar
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: North Fontana, CA.
i saw these some time ago maybe a year at least at an autoshow.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #39  
RotaryP7's Avatar
Seriously.. FML..
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
This looks retarded..
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #40  
dillsrotary's Avatar
jersey fresh
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
science isn't always pretty, makes sense though.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #41  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 3
From: Delaware, USA
Even if they cover it up with rubber the wheels (rims) will be very small. Right now it looks like they be runninz 10s y0 and u kn0w i g0tz to haV 27s!1!!! They may change it completely and make it so the "sidewall" height and wheel radius are in better proportion, but perhaps not. I can only hope that they'd spend extra time/money to engineer them to look more like current wheels for marketing reasons.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #42  
flomulgator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
^ Maybe different is the point. If you're trying to affect a paradigm shift.....

As a matter of pure function the lateral strength of those bands is probably incredible compared to a air-filled tire. As long as the verticle deflection of the bands is equal to the vertical deflection of a thinner air-based tire running on larger wheels than you would be equal or even better. Normal thinking would say that this would be even more competetive because smaller wheels = less weight. However, those bands probably add a lot of weight to the tire so the equation is probably changed drastically.

I think the biggest application here is not for performance. I think treadwear (run it to the bottom!) and potential ability to easily retread are the biggest assets.

Here's a thought: Offroaders removing the outer rim and just running on the bands?!?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #43  
RotaryP7's Avatar
Seriously.. FML..
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by RotaryP7
This looks retarded..
Wow, I had a dream about this.. I was driving my 8 with these tires.. Hmm.. I was riding pretty smooth too.. Weird..
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #44  
Clavius's Avatar
Its all about Style...
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
From: South of Boston, MA
These would be awsome and save some lifes I bet. I have a feeling the demonstration wheel on Future Cars was made on a smaller rim to make sure people are able to see the cavities between the wheel and rim. Should be interesting to see how much these tires will cost if ever actually made though.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #45  
PoLaK's Avatar
Son what is your Alibi?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 2
From: Washington, DC
Anybody know from a perfermance stand point if these could behave better then a pneumatic (sp.) tire?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #46  
flomulgator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
I made a guess about it 3 posts up. Weight probably heavier.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ouimetnick
Series I Tech Garage
25
Sep 14, 2023 01:44 PM
bullbuchanan
RX-8 Discussion
26
Mar 24, 2016 12:37 PM
stickmantijuana
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
10
Oct 27, 2015 04:11 PM
bulletproof21
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
6
Oct 20, 2015 08:53 PM
intense_27
Canada For Sale/Wanted
8
Oct 1, 2015 10:45 AM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.