the new ride. 2010 mustang =]
07-15-2009, 09:33 PM
#26
The Slow and the Serious
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-15-2009, 09:39 PM
#27
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that sucks! I was 17 when I got my first wheels. But it wasn't an 8 or a Mustang. I had me a Dodge Shadow with Holstein seat covers
I don't care if I was 17 or not....I'd never get a Pony. If I ever get a Mustang again, it'll be another V8.
But, on the bright side...at least he's got that fresh new car smell! mmmmmm!
07-15-2009, 09:40 PM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
having test driven a few recently i have to say. they are my favorite mustang since the origional. The inside is much nicer than the 05's. but still. should have gone with the v8. and the handling isn't as bad as the 09s eaither. i actually like that mustang.
07-15-2009, 09:47 PM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they shouldnt even make these cars without a v8. the v8 should be standard, and they should throw in a v12 in the gt. then, it would be a muscle car, but the v8's now days, just dont hold up to their name.
07-15-2009, 09:53 PM
#32
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You should have shopped around more. I'm sure given enough stealerships and the right haggling with them that you would have gotten it for around MSRP. Then again...they are selling more Camaros than they can produce....
07-15-2009, 09:56 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
plus with the fact that he is only 17 and just got a new mustang, means that the stealerships would have been in full steal mode.
07-15-2009, 09:57 PM
#34
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How do V8s not hold up to their name?
Let's look at the 'vettes LS7, the LS9, the LS3, don't forget Ferrari V8s. We can even talk about the older LS1 and LS2s. The Mustang V8s aren't anything to scoff at either and the (w/e they named it) new V8 ford is producing will have similar numbers to the LS3. Don't forget the MOPAR. 6.2L HEMI with 425 hp. How are these not holding up to their name??
O and LSx's are surprisingly fuel efficient for the power they produce
07-15-2009, 09:58 PM
#35
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bring a parent and don't say a word, lol. Let the parent do all of the talking and keep the kid out of it. If the kid even smiles at one of the cars features, the salesman will know he has them on his line (I used to work at Ford).
07-15-2009, 10:00 PM
#36
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O and the people bashing the Mustangs handling should take a look at the track package. They did a nice job on the new mustang with power/handling , especially for the price (but I still dislike the cheap feeling interior...reminds me of my trans am interior 
).
).
07-15-2009, 10:06 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
......lolwhut
How do V8s not hold up to their name?
Let's look at the 'vettes LS7, the LS9, the LS3, don't forget Ferrari V8s. We can even talk about the older LS1 and LS2s. The Mustang V8s aren't anything to scoff at either and the (w/e they named it) new V8 ford is producing will have similar numbers to the LS3. Don't forget the MOPAR. 6.2L HEMI with 425 hp. How are these not holding up to their name??
O and LSx's are surprisingly fuel efficient for the power they produce
How do V8s not hold up to their name?
Let's look at the 'vettes LS7, the LS9, the LS3, don't forget Ferrari V8s. We can even talk about the older LS1 and LS2s. The Mustang V8s aren't anything to scoff at either and the (w/e they named it) new V8 ford is producing will have similar numbers to the LS3. Don't forget the MOPAR. 6.2L HEMI with 425 hp. How are these not holding up to their name??
O and LSx's are surprisingly fuel efficient for the power they produce
im sorry i should have been more specific. the Ford Mustang v8, is just and embarrassment. maybe the new one will hold up something, but i honestly believe that the v8 in the mustang Gt is a embarrassment to the v8 name. yeah chevy makes some kick *** v8's, we all love the ls1 & ls2
i can out run a GT at the strip.
07-15-2009, 10:27 PM
#39
im sorry i should have been more specific. the Ford Mustang v8, is just and embarrassment. maybe the new one will hold up something, but i honestly believe that the v8 in the mustang Gt is a embarrassment to the v8 name. yeah chevy makes some kick *** v8's, we all love the ls1 & ls2
i can out run a GT at the strip.
i can out run a GT at the strip.
the ford's modular v8's are no joke with a little bit of work
07-15-2009, 10:42 PM
#43
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
I love the way everyone mentions the V-8 power and handling when on our cruises a ton of 8 owners bitch about driving hard because they wanna cruise. I don't like Mustangs much either but I would say most 8 owners don't ever drive them anywhere near the limit so the comments seem stupid. This mustang has more power then the 8 he owned and likely would spank it on any track.
Just my thoughts, don't just hate because its not a RX-8.
Just my thoughts, don't just hate because its not a RX-8.
07-15-2009, 10:45 PM
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and how is the v6 mustang much faster than the 8? trust me.. i know from experience. it's not.
07-15-2009, 10:55 PM
#45
