Originally Posted by ARE-EX-8
(Post 3119494)
you had an 8 and now a 2010 mustang..... and youre 17 . Boy do i wish i was you
|
Originally Posted by kvndoom
(Post 3119546)
Yeah, no kidding. I was 26 when I got my first wheels. :rolleyes:
:lol: that sucks! I was 17 when I got my first wheels. But it wasn't an 8 or a Mustang. I had me a Dodge Shadow with Holstein seat covers :yesnod: I don't care if I was 17 or not....I'd never get a Pony. If I ever get a Mustang again, it'll be another V8. But, on the bright side...at least he's got that fresh new car smell! mmmmmm! |
having test driven a few recently i have to say. they are my favorite mustang since the origional. The inside is much nicer than the 05's. but still. should have gone with the v8. and the handling isn't as bad as the 09s eaither. i actually like that mustang.
|
|
they shouldnt even make these cars without a v8. the v8 should be standard, and they should throw in a v12 in the gt. then, it would be a muscle car, but the v8's now days, just dont hold up to their name.
|
Originally Posted by kvndoom
(Post 3119576)
This made me giggle. |
Originally Posted by turbovtec
(Post 3119335)
camaro v6 was marked up 7000 $ lol but yea i was gonna get it if it wasnt. MSRP is 25 but add 7 and it comes out to be 32. taxes ect..options.. 34? 10 more than mustang.
|
Originally Posted by Transam kid 01
(Post 3119585)
You should have shopped around more. I'm sure given enough stealerships and the right haggling with them that you would have gotten it for around MSRP. Then again...they are selling more Camaros than they can produce....
plus with the fact that he is only 17 and just got a new mustang, means that the stealerships would have been in full steal mode. |
Originally Posted by getdamafiaonyou
(Post 3119577)
they shouldnt even make these cars without a v8. the v8 should be standard, and they should throw in a v12 in the gt. then, it would be a muscle car, but the v8's now days, just dont hold up to their name.
How do V8s not hold up to their name? Let's look at the 'vettes LS7, the LS9, the LS3, don't forget Ferrari V8s. We can even talk about the older LS1 and LS2s. The Mustang V8s aren't anything to scoff at either and the (w/e they named it) new V8 ford is producing will have similar numbers to the LS3. Don't forget the MOPAR. 6.2L HEMI with 425 hp. How are these not holding up to their name?? O and LSx's are surprisingly fuel efficient for the power they produce :yesnod: |
Originally Posted by getdamafiaonyou
(Post 3119590)
plus with the fact that he is only 17 and just got a new mustang, means that the stealerships would have been in full steal mode.
|
O and the people bashing the Mustangs handling should take a look at the track package. They did a nice job on the new mustang with power/handling , especially for the price (but I still dislike the cheap feeling interior...reminds me of my trans am interior :puke: ).
|
Originally Posted by Transam kid 01
(Post 3119592)
......lolwhut
How do V8s not hold up to their name? Let's look at the 'vettes LS7, the LS9, the LS3, don't forget Ferrari V8s. We can even talk about the older LS1 and LS2s. The Mustang V8s aren't anything to scoff at either and the (w/e they named it) new V8 ford is producing will have similar numbers to the LS3. Don't forget the MOPAR. 6.2L HEMI with 425 hp. How are these not holding up to their name?? O and LSx's are surprisingly fuel efficient for the power they produce :yesnod: im sorry i should have been more specific. the Ford Mustang v8, is just and embarrassment. maybe the new one will hold up something, but i honestly believe that the v8 in the mustang Gt is a embarrassment to the v8 name. yeah chevy makes some kick ass v8's, we all love the ls1 & ls2 i can out run a GT at the strip. |
It definitally looks better on the outside, but they really need to fix the interior. I've driven a few of them and the interior quality is just crap.
|
Originally Posted by getdamafiaonyou
(Post 3119606)
im sorry i should have been more specific. the Ford Mustang v8, is just and embarrassment. maybe the new one will hold up something, but i honestly believe that the v8 in the mustang Gt is a embarrassment to the v8 name. yeah chevy makes some kick ass v8's, we all love the ls1 & ls2
i can out run a GT at the strip. the ford's modular v8's are no joke with a little bit of work |
All those tickets at 17? Your parents should have brought you a moped instead.
|
^I'm surprised he still has a license
|
+1. He had an autotragic RX8 too. Imagine he had a manual or a V8 Stand.
|
I love the way everyone mentions the V-8 power and handling when on our cruises a ton of 8 owners bitch about driving hard because they wanna cruise. I don't like Mustangs much either but I would say most 8 owners don't ever drive them anywhere near the limit so the comments seem stupid. This mustang has more power then the 8 he owned and likely would spank it on any track.
Just my thoughts, don't just hate because its not a RX-8. |
Originally Posted by topgear8
(Post 3119619)
It definitally looks better on the outside, but they really need to fix the interior. I've driven a few of them and the interior quality is just crap.
and how is the v6 mustang much faster than the 8? trust me.. i know from experience. it's not. |
and how is the v6 mustang much faster than the 8? trust me.. i know from experience. it's not. |
i like the saleen better haha..and the v6 is faster than the auto 8..i have a mustang and rx8 and they both are AT and the mustang is faster..
|
OH i missed the part where the 8 was a auto. yeah the manual v6 would be faster.
|
I spanked a Mustang Gt 2004 AT.. I ran a MT and i was at his tail lights T_T good job for my little 1.3
|
^^ so did i, i expected more out of a V8
|
Originally Posted by getdamafiaonyou
(Post 3119671)
the 2010 mustang has a much nicer interior
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands