Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

New Civic Si dyno in at just under 190 fwhp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-12-2006, 05:04 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Captain Amazing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Civic Si dyno in at just under 190 fwhp?

I have seen some new dynos of the Si and it looks like they get more power to the wheels then our cars. eek
Old 02-12-2006, 05:15 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
AdamK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And it weighs less than the 8.....
Old 02-12-2006, 05:16 PM
  #3  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry, I drove one and it's slower then the 8.
Old 02-12-2006, 05:16 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Imidazole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and its a Honda.
Old 02-12-2006, 05:18 PM
  #5  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and body roll is huge.
Old 02-12-2006, 05:27 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Roaddemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Milwaukee Wi.
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Si only puts out 197 at the crank. Dynos are not always accurate and should only be used as starting point for mods on your car. I do like the looks of the Civic. Alot of car for the money.
Old 02-12-2006, 05:45 PM
  #7  
dmp
RX8 and a Truk....
 
dmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OKC
Posts: 4,658
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
...and body roll is huge.

Huger than a stock rx8?
Old 02-12-2006, 05:47 PM
  #8  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep hugest

Go test drive one. You won't feel any confidence at all in the corners.
Old 02-12-2006, 05:52 PM
  #9  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh god... never believe a dyno sheet from a civic website
Old 02-12-2006, 06:13 PM
  #10  
Scuderia
iTrader: (6)
 
RA-Eight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buckeye Country
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Imidazole
...and its a Honda.
Which means....? Better overall quality, reliability, and value retention? Those seem to be all great brand traits to me.
Old 02-12-2006, 06:13 PM
  #11  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Captain Amazing
I have seen some new dynos of the Si and it looks like they get more power to the wheels then our cars. eek
It's about the same maybe a touch more, just like the RSX Type S so on a dyno 190whp is probably about right.

Last edited by Ike; 02-12-2006 at 06:17 PM.
Old 02-12-2006, 06:16 PM
  #12  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
yep hugest

Go test drive one. You won't feel any confidence at all in the corners.
You must have driven one without the tire package and be confusing soft sidewalls with excessive body roll. The new SI is getting .9+ on the skidpad and perfect scores in fun to drive and handling from C&D as well as other pubilications
Old 02-12-2006, 06:27 PM
  #13  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
You must have driven one without the tire package and be confusing soft sidewalls with excessive body roll. The new SI is getting .9+ on the skidpad and perfect scores in fun to drive and handling from C&D as well as other pubilications

maybe, I didn't check the tires that were on there. I was actually dissapointed with the power more then anything. I thought it would pull harder then it did. Also, ever since honda gave up on the double wishbone setup, I just don't feel comfortable cornering in these fwd cars.
Old 02-12-2006, 06:29 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
nolarx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A friend of mine at work just got his and let me take to the airport about an hour ride so i had a few miles to work with. it's not as fast as a stock mt8 but i have to say great car! and you know it will be easy to make very fast.
Old 02-12-2006, 08:07 PM
  #15  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RA-Eight
Which means....? Better overall quality, reliability, and value retention? Those seem to be all great brand traits to me.
Not in my experience, nor my friend (who is a Honda fan).

Another Honda brand trait... 99% of their cars are FWD.
Old 02-12-2006, 08:18 PM
  #16  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Captain Amazing
I have seen some new dynos of the Si and it looks like they get more power to the wheels then our cars. eek
Not more than mine does

And besides, they are putting the HP to the wrong set of wheels.
Old 02-12-2006, 08:35 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Captain Amazing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RA-Eight
Which means....? Better overall quality, reliability, and value retention? Those seem to be all great brand traits to me.
I agree, there is nothing wrong with the vehicles that Honda makes. Take a look at the S2000 and NSX.
Old 02-12-2006, 10:23 PM
  #18  
THREAD KILLER
 
Xyntax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And like a typical Honda, cheap mods can make it faster than stock.
Old 02-12-2006, 10:40 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
StealthFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its a good car no doubt about it but even if its faster than the rx8(which its not) its still not a sports car and can never do what the 8 can. not bashing it just stating an obvious concrete fact that for 18k you're not going to be killing 350zs as some make it out to.
Old 02-12-2006, 10:45 PM
  #20  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StealthFox
its a good car no doubt about it but even if its faster than the rx8(which its not) its still not a sports car and can never do what the 8 can. not bashing it just stating an obvious concrete fact that for 18k you're not going to be killing 350zs as some make it out to.
No one is making it out to be a Z killer. Also it traps just as high and if the RSX Ype S is an indication a little higher than the RX-8. So technically it's just as fast as the RX-8 it's just not as quick because from a dig it's down on traction due to the FWD.
Old 02-12-2006, 10:49 PM
  #21  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think it's as light as you all may think. I redlined 1,2,3 and it felt very slow for 200hp....It doesn't even feel as fast as an integra gsr.
Old 02-12-2006, 11:06 PM
  #22  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
I don't think it's as light as you all may think. I redlined 1,2,3 and it felt very slow for 200hp....It doesn't even feel as fast as an integra gsr.
2860 is what C&D claims for weight, not bad by modern standards but a good bit heavier than the older tegs and SI. I haven't driven one so I can't comment on how fast it feels but the numbers don't lie.
Old 02-12-2006, 11:23 PM
  #23  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well yes that sounds about right. It's wayyy heavier then it should be. YOu should go drive one and get back. Id be interested in what you think. I'm also a bit skeptical about this 190 whp. I'd like to see the dyno. I was actually excited to drive it and it just didn't impress me like I thought it would.
Old 02-13-2006, 12:09 AM
  #24  
Registered
 
StealthFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
190whp is extremely mischevious
Old 02-13-2006, 12:25 AM
  #25  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StealthFox
190whp is extremely mischevious
Not really, plenty of 05+ RSX Type S' have dynoed around or over 180whp, they also can get up to 15whp from an intake. So a generous dyno, factory freak, slightly better intake system for the SI, or uncorrected numbers and "almost 190whp" isn't a problem.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New Civic Si dyno in at just under 190 fwhp?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 AM.