Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

inside look on BMW X6 V8TT

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 29, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #1  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
Thread Starter
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
inside look on BMW X6 V8TT

it won't be out til mid-late summer. but i got 2 shots of the V8 TT. couldn't take too many since it isn't even out yet. plus, all i had was my cell phone. they are garrett turbos btw.
Attached Thumbnails inside look on BMW X6 V8TT-img00083.jpg   inside look on BMW X6 V8TT-img00084.jpg  
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #2  
faboo's Avatar
Downhill Touge FTW!!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Buena Park
wow thats different.......

lol

that has to be a first for any vehicle...a TT I6 or a TT V8 as the engine choices
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #3  
Jasonawojo's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
It's going to be a beast. 450+ ft-lbs torque from a BMW is unheard of.
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 10:32 PM
  #4  
thecow135's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
M5!/m6!
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 11:43 PM
  #5  
GeTcRuNk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
is it an M? or is it an X6?

....I got it! Its an MX6 haha
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #6  
tiggerlee's Avatar
May Cause Anal Leakage
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
From: Orlando & Chicago
mmmMMMMMmmm...torque





Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 12:06 AM
  #7  
dshiznit1489's Avatar
Formerly Polak Graphics
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
That thing looks insanely heavy.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #8  
NaarLeven's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Ah i'm so happy carmakers are getting out of the "lets make it all N/A" mentality and realizing how efficient and reliable turbos are!

So come the days with +50hp/+100tq remaps
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 08:47 AM
  #9  
dillsrotary's Avatar
jersey fresh
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
are those turbos the same size as the 335?
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #10  
JRichter's Avatar
Void Where Prohibited
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
From: Mineola, TX
Jeez...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #11  
foxman's Avatar
Torque is Good
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by dillsrotary
are those turbos the same size as the 335?
They look a bit larger, the N54 engine uses Mitsubishi Turbos

Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #12  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
It's the location that's so amazing. the n54 turbos are more of a standard mounting location. mounting the turbos in the channel like that is pretty crazy. they most have done ridiculous engineering to determine if the added heat soak from the turbos would impact the engine at all..
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #13  
foxman's Avatar
Torque is Good
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Dshiznit1489
That thing looks insanely heavy.
The 50i version of the X6 weighs in at an incredible 5,200+
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #14  
TurboEight's Avatar
Booost.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Markham/Richmond Hill/Toronto
Originally Posted by foxman
The 50i version of the X6 weighs in at an incredible 5,200+
tank..lol
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #15  
REsuperD's Avatar
zoom zoom
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by foxman
The 50i version of the X6 weighs in at an incredible 5,200+
5,200+ pounds? why don't they make 'em heavier?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #16  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
The weird thing is from all reports it handles very well seeing as it's a tank.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #17  
delhi's Avatar
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 62
From: Home of the NIMBYs
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
The weird thing is from all reports it handles very well seeing as it's a tank.
compared to what? USS Nimitz?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #18  
REsuperD's Avatar
zoom zoom
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
The weird thing is from all reports it handles very well seeing as it's a tank.
not that weird. some versions of the porsche cayenne handle real well, too, and those're the original tanks. it's all done with LOTS and LOTS and LOTS of electronic gizmos and ginormous tires
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #19  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
If it was a wagon it wouldn't seem so bad it's just that it's jacked up so it would seem there would be a lot of body roll and inertia from the 2.5 ton mass. I applaud BMW for making it handle as well as it does but I question the thinking behind creating it at all. The TT V8 with all the techno wizardry would be much more palatable under a 2009 Audi Avant skin.

I’d like to see Mazda get the “Twin Force” V-6 (Is it Ecoboost now?) from Ford and stuff it in the new Mazda 6 with the new Haladex AWD unit. 350-400hp in the Mazda 6 wagon would be pretty cool, sedan and liftback too of course. I’m sure they won’t though.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #20  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
It is so ugly. Just get an X5.
Reply



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.