Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

EPA to finally fix mileage testing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-19-2005, 09:49 PM
  #1  
Go Texas Longhorns!
Thread Starter
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
EPA to finally fix mileage testing

Its about &#$! #$%!@ Freakin Time



http://www.boston.com/cars/articles/...leage_testing/
Old 09-20-2005, 12:24 AM
  #2  
NoahZoom Cop'n'Training
 
nzarnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am still never going to trust them. All you have to do is look at consumer reports and talk to actual owners to know their mpg.
Old 09-20-2005, 08:43 AM
  #3  
Oil Injection
 
KYLiquid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
its not that the EPA or auto makers are 'inflating' the numbers, or making them up....its the fact that the test method doesnt mimic real world driving.

The EPA rating on the RX8 is what 18/24 ?

every tank of gas I put in the car gives me 20/25 city/highway.........thats OVER epa estimates. I know that all of out 8's are a little differnt and so are we....but a great deal of it comes down to HOW you drive it!
Old 09-20-2005, 09:03 AM
  #4  
Go Texas Longhorns!
Thread Starter
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
While no test is every going to be perfect, the current test is so far of the mark its not worth the paper its printed on.
Old 09-20-2005, 10:06 AM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
fray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't till I got rid of the oxygenated fuel that my RX-8 is close to the EPA numbers.. (using E10, I got much much worse fuel economy.)
Old 09-20-2005, 10:11 AM
  #6  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
so how many numbers will this 'new' EPA mileage rating system will come up with?
Old 09-20-2005, 10:37 AM
  #7  
the Doctor
iTrader: (1)
 
Feras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.5/13/22.5 (racing/city/highway) here i can live with that
Old 09-20-2005, 11:14 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
MikeW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with CAFE is that they use the uncorrected numbers from the EPA test.
City window sticker is 10% less, Highway is 22% less.
So the cafe targets are an easy target.
So if the window sticker is unrealistic as to what drivers actually get, what good is CAFE, none.
Old 09-20-2005, 11:25 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
RotrDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: I've shaken off the sands of SouthWest Asia and returned to Houston and Gulfport, MS
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KYLiquid
its not that the EPA or auto makers are 'inflating' the numbers, or making them up....its the fact that the test method doesnt mimic real world driving.

The EPA rating on the RX8 is what 18/24 ?

every tank of gas I put in the car gives me 20/25 city/highway.........thats OVER epa estimates. I know that all of out 8's are a little differnt and so are we....but a great deal of it comes down to HOW you drive it!

Just got my 45,000 mile service and the "R" flash (NICE!!!). I was very disciplined on the Interstate and held her to 70-72 (3600 rpm). This is the first time I've come anywhere close to the EPA numbers: 23.4 mpg running through 14 gal. It was a bit of a thrill watching the odometer roll past 300 without the warning light on, but not enough to make up for the frustration of driving that slow.
Old 09-20-2005, 11:54 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
LycosV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotrDoc
Just got my 45,000 mile service and the "R" flash (NICE!!!). I was very disciplined on the Interstate and held her to 70-72 (3600 rpm). This is the first time I've come anywhere close to the EPA numbers: 23.4 mpg running through 14 gal. It was a bit of a thrill watching the odometer roll past 300 without the warning light on, but not enough to make up for the frustration of driving that slow.
Yeah, following the law of the speed limit on the fastest roads in America, how frustrating.
Old 09-20-2005, 12:04 PM
  #11  
I am a meat popcicle
 
TownDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: So CA
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Finally. People who consider mileage when purchasing a car are gong to start crapping bricks when they see a more real world mileage indicated on the windows.

What I wonder is how this will affect Federal and State mileage requirements. Will they lower those estimates based on the new testing, then go from there? I would think they'd have to.
Old 09-20-2005, 01:15 PM
  #12  
Go Texas Longhorns!
Thread Starter
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Most cars can get or exceed the current hwy mileage if you look at the consumer reports testing. Its the city mileage for SUV's and trucks that is going to be really embarising for many automakers if the test changes.

In reality, if you don't drive it like you stole it, most average cars won't see a meaningful impact. Its the trucks and SUV's that have the most to worry about.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05TR1CH
New Member Forum
14
04-18-2023 04:56 AM
HMSS013
Series I Do It Yourself Forum
7
04-09-2023 09:13 AM
k4thomas
New Member Forum
6
08-05-2015 03:03 AM
Peanutbuttertruffle
New Member Forum
6
07-24-2015 07:49 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: EPA to finally fix mileage testing



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.