edmunds latest RX 7 news
#1
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massapequa, NY
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like there will be 2 engine options available, much like the Genesis. Maybe they release a standard NA 23-25k version with 250hp, and an FI MS variant arounf 35k out the gate.
#4
Which direction Mazda will choose is still unclear, but the less powerful, less expensive option seems to make more sense in the current economic climate.
This seems to go with the new lighter/less expensive miata coming about the same time.
This seems to go with the new lighter/less expensive miata coming about the same time.
#6
inexpensive, not-so-powered rx-7 will cut sales to ND IMHO*.
better do a small numbers, hi-power rx-7 hi-tech.
*why do that kind of 7? to go under toyobaru, Hyundai and Silvia?...... pointless. at that level of price customers of that kind of car still prefer pistons engine...more familiar.
better excite aficionados with a lightweight 350hp beast.
better do a small numbers, hi-power rx-7 hi-tech.
*why do that kind of 7? to go under toyobaru, Hyundai and Silvia?...... pointless. at that level of price customers of that kind of car still prefer pistons engine...more familiar.
better excite aficionados with a lightweight 350hp beast.
#9
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Put the current 232hp Series II renesis into a sleek styled 2-seat sports that's around the weight of a MX-5, and they'll have a winner on their hands. Whenever the 16X is production ready, they could release that as the top-of-the-line performance model a few years later.
#11
You Dumbass!!!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Fontana, CA.
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sounds like a similar article on autoblog.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/26/m...aces-for-2012/
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/26/m...aces-for-2012/
#17
sounds like a similar article on autoblog.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/26/m...aces-for-2012/
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/26/m...aces-for-2012/
Thanks good article
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sounds like a similar article on autoblog.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/26/m...aces-for-2012/
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/26/m...aces-for-2012/
For example, they turned this from Inside line
Originally Posted by Inside Line
While we hear that the 16X is still early in its developmental stages and issues regarding fuel economy and weight (too heavy) are rumored, the new 1,600cc two-rotor design supposedly has the potential to produce up to 350 hp with 215 pound-feet of torque.
Originally Posted by From Autoblog
despite earlier rumors that the latest 1.6-liter 16X powerplant was kicking out as much as 350 horses while still achieving superior fuel economy over its forebears.
________
Web Shows
Last edited by Renesis_8; 09-11-2011 at 03:29 PM.
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massapequa, NY
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the subtracted weight, I'd say a Renny would get an extra 2-3mpg hi way, and 1-2 city. The sad part is this would put it equal to or less than the advertised #s for the RX-8.
#23
mod edit
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah i don't think it will happen either. Also why the hell spend so much resources to develop an engine for a niche market which won't have the reliability/economy of a piston motor anyway if it's just gunna have basically the same bhp figures as the current renesis? What is all the money going to if it doesn't really perform better and still gets presumably shitty mileage/reliability versus a piston engine? For all the wait and hype and resources put into it, why not just give it some actual power so at least I will have incentive to get it; even if the motor blows up later on. It's a car for enthusiasts.
#24
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
yeah i don't think it will happen either. Also why the hell spend so much resources to develop an engine for a niche market which won't have the reliability/economy of a piston motor anyway if it's just gunna have basically the same bhp figures as the current renesis? What is all the money going to if it doesn't really perform better and still gets presumably shitty mileage/reliability versus a piston engine? For all the wait and hype and resources put into it, why not just give it some actual power so at least I will have incentive to get it; even if the motor blows up later on. It's a car for enthusiasts.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massapequa, NY
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They keep mentioning 2 power ranges. This could mean 2 rotary options. Earlier reports were that there would be an RX7 2 seater, and RX9 4 seater/4door coupe with conventional doors. Speculation aside, I love the buzz. It seems to be gaining momentum by the day, much like the GT-R prior to its release.