Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Compression Charge Recirculation Engine Load Control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-19-2010, 03:36 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compression Charge Recirculation Engine Load Control

Compression Charge Recirculation Engine Load Control - New Patent for Rotary engines to help increase HP and better fuel economy. Don't think it's a repost, correct me if I'm wrong.

http://mechanicalgalaxy.blogspot.com...on-engine.html
Old 01-19-2010, 04:25 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
pking1122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massapequa, NY
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn it, I'm fire walled.
Old 01-19-2010, 04:33 PM
  #3  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pking1122
Damn it, I'm fire walled.
[embed]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WOtQG35EK_s&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WOtQG35EK_s&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>[/embed]

Here ya go.

Saw this a year or so ago. It seemed rather nifty.
Old 01-19-2010, 04:53 PM
  #4  
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)
iTrader: (4)
 
L337fpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Franeke
Posts: 2,366
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
This could be interesting...
Old 01-19-2010, 05:04 PM
  #5  
So this Rotary thing...?
 
azzuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks interesting. I wonder how it will affect torque?
Old 01-19-2010, 05:54 PM
  #6  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm just curious if it will even work as intended. Since I don't know physics or have a degree in engineering, what is going help push the air/fuel up into that extra chamber up there? wouldn't the pressure difference just keep it going along it's natural route? Also, wouldn't it be a bit harder to tune the cars with that?

Just my uneducated questions.
Old 01-19-2010, 06:32 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
pking1122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massapequa, NY
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^1. Thanks for posting that. Much appreciated.
2. I would guess if they have a patent on the technology, that it has been tested from an R&D stand point. Something this radical would almost certainly have to be included on a new rotary variant (possibly 16X). But anything is possible.
Old 01-19-2010, 06:56 PM
  #8  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pking1122
^1. Thanks for posting that. Much appreciated.
2. I would guess if they have a patent on the technology, that it has been tested from an R&D stand point. Something this radical would almost certainly have to be included on a new rotary variant (possibly 16X). But anything is possible.
Correct me if I'm wrong, by all means, but can't anybody patent something, even if it doesn't necessarily work? Like you can patent an idea so nobody else grabs it in the future?
Old 01-19-2010, 08:05 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
pking1122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massapequa, NY
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point. This is true.
Originally Posted by CyberPitz
Correct me if I'm wrong, by all means, but can't anybody patent something, even if it doesn't necessarily work? Like you can patent an idea so nobody else grabs it in the future?
Old 01-19-2010, 09:30 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
terrypk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how is this supposed to work? I am confused....
doesn't it just LEAK Air Fuel mixture...when the engine is under stress....
Old 01-20-2010, 10:43 AM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no idea. It looked cool and was new to me. Maybe someone can explain it.
Old 01-20-2010, 01:11 PM
  #12  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How do they plan it to work? It looks like while idle/light load, additional fuel gets passed through the upper route, but that seems to me like the same thing as tuning it to run a little more lean..?
Old 01-20-2010, 09:32 PM
  #13  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Phalkhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Perris, California
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CyberPitz
How do they plan it to work? It looks like while idle/light load, additional fuel gets passed through the upper route, but that seems to me like the same thing as tuning it to run a little more lean..?
Maybe that's exacty what it's for, a different way to lean the car out. Taking some of the extra fuel out would help emissons. And maybe by mixing in the already mixed air/fuel back into the combustion chamber at low rpms will give a better burn and increase low-end torque.
Old 01-21-2010, 09:55 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
TALAN7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roselle, NJ
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great, another part to brake on the rotary.
Old 01-21-2010, 09:59 AM
  #15  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares as long as they continue to give us an 8yr/100k warranty on the engine.
Old 01-21-2010, 02:27 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
shizzlesled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Fe, Texas
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^good point, I wonder if it works like an expansion chamber on a paintball gun. Id be interested to see how this could work with an FI setup. After watching the vid a few times it makes sense how this could improve the rtry engine. By keeping air circulating there seems to be less loss of momentum. On a side note; wasnt there another patent said to increase co2 emmsions and power in the use of aircraft engines by altering firing or somthing. I remember the thread a few months back
Old 01-21-2010, 02:50 PM
  #17  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Phalkhan
Maybe that's exacty what it's for, a different way to lean the car out. Taking some of the extra fuel out would help emissons. And maybe by mixing in the already mixed air/fuel back into the combustion chamber at low rpms will give a better burn and increase low-end torque.
Why not just keep the car leaned out like normal? Why go through this? I'm not knocking this, and I'd be the first to say I'm glad to be wrong, I just don't see the advantage of this when sat next to the current day ECU.
Old 01-21-2010, 03:43 PM
  #18  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
well, according to the description it says it increases torque. which is nice.

but i'll bet $5 we dont see this on the 16x. that engine is for the most part already done. they either fix the problems they have with it or scrap it. i doubt they will be changing the housings for something new.

its not a mazda patent, mind you.
Old 01-21-2010, 03:49 PM
  #19  
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
 
Vlaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In da woodz, lurking after you
Posts: 1,865
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CyberPitz
Correct me if I'm wrong, by all means, but can't anybody patent something, even if it doesn't necessarily work? Like you can patent an idea so nobody else grabs it in the future?
I may be wrong but it's very hard to just patent an idea and not a prototype. This is because anyone can make up something and claim rights on it and never make a prototype. I think someone would only do this attempting such if they planned on selling the rights to someone else but I believe this is quite hard to do.

Usually you only want a patent for majority of cases if you plan on making a prototype to follow up on it to guarantee that the idea stays yours. Otherwise, someone else can easily ****** the idea even if patented, and slightly change something on it to get outside the loophole and claim it as their own.
Old 01-21-2010, 03:51 PM
  #20  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe it recirculates some air/fuel mixture requiring less fuel consumption. I'm not sure how it applies to increased performance
Old 01-21-2010, 03:55 PM
  #21  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vlaze
I may be wrong but it's very hard to just patent an idea and not a prototype. This is because anyone can make up something and claim rights on it and never make a prototype. I think someone would only do this attempting such if they planned on selling the rights to someone else but I believe this is quite hard to do.

Usually you only want a patent for majority of cases if you plan on making a prototype to follow up on it to guarantee that the idea stays yours. Otherwise, someone else can easily ****** the idea even if patented, and slightly change something on it to get outside the loophole and claim it as their own.
Didn't NASA patent the idea to live on the moon and NASA called it Myspace. Then NASA sued Myspace.com for patent infringement because they stole the name? Or was it copy write infringement?
Old 01-22-2010, 06:55 PM
  #22  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Vlaze
I may be wrong but it's very hard to just patent an idea and not a prototype. This is because anyone can make up something and claim rights on it and never make a prototype. I think someone would only do this attempting such if they planned on selling the rights to someone else but I believe this is quite hard to do.

Usually you only want a patent for majority of cases if you plan on making a prototype to follow up on it to guarantee that the idea stays yours. Otherwise, someone else can easily ****** the idea even if patented, and slightly change something on it to get outside the loophole and claim it as their own.
True, having a prototype is just fine, but I was mentioning having it patented without it working properly. I mean, sure, they could have the engine doing what it does, but does it work, to increase MPG and low end performance? *if that is what they are claiming it to do*
Old 01-24-2010, 12:07 AM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Loki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 7,712
Received 952 Likes on 830 Posts
Looks like they're effectively lowering the compression ratio at idle/light load by leaking the fuel/air mix from the rotor face while it's being compressed.. though that by itself would lower torque, not raise it. Would help clean out the pocket of over-rich mixture at the back of each rotor face though, helping fuel economy.

Wait, I think this is supposed to replace the throttle body. The little valve is open when in our cars the throttle is closed, so each face makes little compression... just enough to idle I suppose... then if the driver presses on the go pedal, the valve closes, increasing the compression and making more power, so spinning up the engine. Nifty. Could be a lot more responsive, but the fuel efficiency could go up a lot. Clever!
Old 01-24-2010, 01:57 AM
  #24  
Registered
 
999miki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This is basically atkins cycle rotary. Absence of throttle plates vastly lowering pumping looses and effectively, expansion is longer than compression-which is good thing. Similar system is using toyota in prius engine and honda in certain engines-at low load, intake valves closing is delayed the point, where quite large part of fresh charge is escaping back to intake... but these engines have higher CR ratio so it would be very interesting how it would work in rotary...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
11-03-2020 03:38 PM
Eirulisse
New Member Forum
13
08-15-2015 12:34 PM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM
cschoeps
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
08-06-2015 12:44 PM
Belalnabi
New Member Forum
9
07-17-2015 07:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Compression Charge Recirculation Engine Load Control



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.