Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

The 2007 G35

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #26  
map's Avatar
map
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
Originally Posted by m477
Unfortunately, they're probably not going to do it because it wouldn't involve platform sharing. The ideal solution IMO would be to update the S platform (S16) and use it for both a new Silvia and the new Z. That way we could have both a cheap, 2.5L 4-seater Silvia coupe, and a 2-seater 3.5L 350Z, both well under 3000lbs. And the bean counters would get to preserve their sacred platform sharing.
You guys are dreaming. We'll never see a new RWD car at < 3000lbs. Cars are getting bigger and heavier. If you try to cut weight you end up killing yourself in safety, comfort, and all the other things that the mass market wants. A civic Si is almost 3000lbs and it's only fwd. I think the only remote chance is the Kabura. Nissan will never do it.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #27  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Haven't people weighed their base model RX-8's at under 3000lbs? And the new MX-5 weighs 2500lbs, and is quite comfortable and safe. And if they make a Kabura or new RX-7, those would most definitely weight under 3,000lbs as well.

The thing you've got to keep in mind here is that the Silvia is smaller than the RX-8 and doesn't have rear doors. The last Silvia was produced in 2002 and had a 250hp turbo engine with a chassis, suspension and brakes to match and still only weighed 2,800lbs. Sure, an updated version might add a few pounds but I don't think that sub-3000lbs is at all unrealistic.

Also, keep in mind that a number of new cars today have ended up *lighter* than their predecessors, such as the new 5-series, the new Legacy, and the new Corvette.

Last edited by m477; Sep 7, 2006 at 07:55 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #28  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
^^^You're idea for a Silvia sounds good but it just doesn't gel with Infinity's business plan right now. It would require a completely new chassis and all the R&D that goes with it. The only thing that they won't really need to worry about is the engine. Still, with all the effort that will go into making a Silvia (240sx) the car will definitely not be cheap. It'll probably end up around the cost of an RX-8.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 08:31 PM
  #29  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by m477
Haven't people weighed their base model RX-8's at under 3000lbs? And the new MX-5 weighs 2500lbs, and is quite comfortable and safe. And if they make a Kabura or new RX-7, those would most definitely weight under 3,000lbs as well.

The thing you've got to keep in mind here is that the Silvia is smaller than the RX-8 and doesn't have rear doors. The last Silvia was produced in 2002 and had a 250hp turbo engine with a chassis, suspension and brakes to match and still only weighed 2,800lbs. Sure, an updated version might add a few pounds but I don't think that sub-3000lbs is at all unrealistic.

Also, keep in mind that a number of new cars today have ended up *lighter* than their predecessors, such as the new 5-series, the new Legacy, and the new Corvette.
While, I agree with you that current generation vehicles only are getting heavier, I will completely disagree with the notion that <3000 vehicles are gone. They will return once the auto industry moves towards modern materials.

Take a look at the lotus elise. We're going to see a migration towards that type of design. The elise may not have a sickenning amount of horsepower, but it compromises by having less weight. In fact, the difference between the elise in the US and Europe is the safety features and the weight difference is small (it's just the airbags in this case). The elise does this by using an aluminum bonded tub chassis. They started this with the last model esprit and really perfected it with the elise. The esprit btw was a 2+2 with a small turbo V8 that put out 350 horsepower stock, and it weighed in at just over 3000lbs (3042lbs). That's without carbon fiber and a V8 that weighed 220kg (485lbs). Just imagine what that car would be like today.

Lighter stronger materials are more expensive today, but their prices are coming down and affordable production cars are coming. It'll just take some time, especially here in the GM/Ford driven US where the SUV has ruled for the last 10 years. Now that that era is over, lightweight, agile cars are sure to return (check out the tesla if you don't believe me).
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #30  
map's Avatar
map
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
Originally Posted by Ajax
While, I agree with you that current generation vehicles only are getting heavier, I will completely disagree with the notion that <3000 vehicles are gone. They will return once the auto industry moves towards modern materials.

Take a look at the lotus elise. We're going to see a migration towards that type of design. The elise may not have a sickenning amount of horsepower, but it compromises by having less weight. In fact, the difference between the elise in the US and Europe is the safety features and the weight difference is small (it's just the airbags in this case). The elise does this by using an aluminum bonded tub chassis. They started this with the last model esprit and really perfected it with the elise. The esprit btw was a 2+2 with a small turbo V8 that put out 350 horsepower stock, and it weighed in at just over 3000lbs (3042lbs). That's without carbon fiber and a V8 that weighed 220kg (485lbs). Just imagine what that car would be like today.

Lighter stronger materials are more expensive today, but their prices are coming down and affordable production cars are coming. It'll just take some time, especially here in the GM/Ford driven US where the SUV has ruled for the last 10 years. Now that that era is over, lightweight, agile cars are sure to return (check out the tesla if you don't believe me).
The cars you mention are niche vehicles that cost a premium. I see what you're saying about costs coming down on thier technology as time passes, but the simple fact is that steel will always be cheaper than aluminum, carbon fiber, or any other material that weighs substantially less. Part of the deal for a new Silvia would be an affordable price, and as long as that's a concern you're going to have two things, the lowest costing material (steel) and most likely platform sharing.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #31  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by map
The cars you mention are niche vehicles that cost a premium. I see what you're saying about costs coming down on thier technology as time passes, but the simple fact is that steel will always be cheaper than aluminum, carbon fiber, or any other material that weighs substantially less. Part of the deal for a new Silvia would be an affordable price, and as long as that's a concern you're going to have two things, the lowest costing material (steel) and most likely platform sharing.
The auto industry is driven like the computer industry. High end vehicles define what new technology we'll someday see in lower end cars generally. Take a look at the newest porsche 911 turbo that will have a Variable Geometry Turbo, something that only the diesel industry has enjoyed for years.
The technology in those top end cars will either die off or make it into lower end production vehicles.


The elise runs 40k, which is 10k more than a fully loaded 8 when it was released. The elise platform was designed to be shared throughout lotus vehicles and theyre doing that already. There's nothing to say that the auto industry cannot build platforms like this except cost. Lotus can afford to do it because they're a small niche auto manufacturer that only has to tool to build 1 type of vehicle. The rest of the industry would have to retool to build them.

Carbon fiber is only expensive to make because the manufacturing process isnt as perfected / proven as something like steel. You're right, steel will be around for a while, and it certainly has its merits, but the industry already recognizes that they could build better performing and more fuel efficient vehicles if they made them lighter.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #32  
playdoh43's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland














Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #33  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
!^^
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #34  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
i like it.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #35  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
The exterior looks nice. The interior well.. it still looks kinda cheap.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #36  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
I saw pictures of it in black a little while ago, and didn't really like it. Looks a lot better in silver.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #37  
Rhawb's Avatar
Has the whole shit.
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by m477
http://www.350z-tech.com/zwiki/VQ35HR

There are two versions of the new VQ, a 2.5L and a 3.5L. The 2.5L would be just right for a new Silvia if they decided to make one. The 3.5 would be too much engine for the car -- they would have to beef up everything else to handle it, so it would end up too expensive and/or heavy. There actually is such a thing as too much power when you're trying to keep a car inexpensive, simple, and light.

Unfortunately, they're probably not going to do it because it wouldn't involve platform sharing. The ideal solution IMO would be to update the S platform (S16) and use it for both a new Silvia and the new Z. That way we could have both a cheap, 2.5L 4-seater Silvia coupe, and a 2-seater 3.5L 350Z, both well under 3000lbs. And the bean counters would get to preserve their sacred platform sharing.
Never said it would be particularly practical or inexpensive - hell, I never even said it was realistically possible, I just said it'd be a blast if it existed. I realize that the chances of such a car coming to fruition are somewhere between slim and none and slim's got his bags all packed and ready, but a man can dream.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #38  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
I just wish it was available WIHOUT the stupid screen...
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #39  
Dinhx8's Avatar
My Rex goes to 11!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, VA
i like it, i will say i still dont like the interior. that nav console thats almost horizontal looks like they shoved an Intellivision or Atari on the dash. Plus the buttons at that angle would seem hard to read/decipher. not sure if its a deal breaker for me, but wish it looked better on the inside.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 02:15 PM
  #40  
playdoh43's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
i believe the harddrive comes standard, it will only be a matter of time before someone hack the firmware and start playing **** in the car :p
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #41  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
It's definitely evolutionary, but in a good way. Nissan improved the weaker aspects of the 1st generation. The styling change is pretty subtle though. An even better dear.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #42  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
I only wish it was more A4/IS350/3 series size... its the same complaint that I had with the last generation and I still can't get myself to accept driving a midsized car
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #43  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Hadn't seen those. I'm in love....
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #44  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by r0tor
I only wish it was more A4/IS350/3 series size... its the same complaint that I had with the last generation and I still can't get myself to accept driving a midsized car

The coupe is smaller in size.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #45  
captain mercury's Avatar
Mr. T is my copilot
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
From: los angeles
eww. i know its "just the sedan", but i think the styling update is a step or two backwards. they didnt seem to change much, but the details (like the cutout running along the bottom) looks liek crap to me.

why do they bother with the analog clock? is that supposed to imply classiness?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 11:52 PM
  #46  
toxin440's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Texas
yeah I agree - the analog clock looks like *** to me. Makes me appreciate my RX8 interior even more.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #47  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
Nice update, if I can get my wife away from SUV's I'd consider one for our familymobile.

Still, not an exciting car. A Charger SRT8 sells for about the same up here...thats exciting!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
BillBertelli
NE For Sale/Wanted
4
Mar 19, 2016 03:01 PM
Michael Bryant
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
5
Oct 12, 2015 03:07 PM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:48 PM
JAYDOH
New Member Forum
10
Sep 24, 2015 01:54 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.