Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2005 BMW M5 official Pics... Yeah!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 11:34 PM
  #26  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
Oh man. I dont like the Z4. To me it trys to hard.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 11:52 PM
  #27  
scorp76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Tx
And some, like the Z/G35, could stand to try harder.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #28  
canaryrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 2
I dig the new styling personally, the B-Mers were looking pretty stale for a while, now when you drive around and see one in traffic etc. there is no mistaking them, even if some folks are going "what the heck is that, ewww", at least their new shapes don't people to sleep like the older ones
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #29  
nosubstitutec4s's Avatar
9000 RPM Viagera
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by RX8MN
Well, it looks a lot better than the 745Li, which, to my mind, is one of the most hideous cars on the road. Still think the 5er looks like a Toyota on steroids and i drive is a lousy interface. The smg is a joke, an auto or regular manual will be better. The smg does not shift well in auto mode, and most buyers will use it there. IMHO BMW has taken a turn for the worse and Benz is going to eat their lunch - make mine an E55!
sorry, but i gotta call you out on this one. saying that the SMG is a bad system is complete ignorence. Maybe you have driven a NON ///M smg equiped car, and i will give you that they are not all that great in the "standard" bmw's. There is a reason for this. BMW decided not to include drive logic(or something of the likes) for the non m cars. This results in generally poor and jerky shifts between gears.
In the ///M cars (M3 is the only car currently on sale, but the upcoming M5 will have an smg option as well), drive logic will be included and the result is butter smooth shifts. In downshifts, the engine automaticlly blips itself, making it look like a perfect shift every time you do it.

sry for the tangent, but i love BMW's too much to let this one slide
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #30  
InessHell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0

0-60 in 4.2 secs mercedes answer to the m5!


Attached Thumbnails 2005 BMW M5 official Pics... Yeah!-sl65_bai.jpg  

Last edited by InessHell; Jul 11, 2004 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #31  
map's Avatar
map
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
Originally Posted by JeupRX-8
anyone else notice the similiarities between the M5 and a WRX in the rear? The taillights are very similiar, along with the gentle slope downward. It's an odd choice for inspiration but does seem like more than coincidence to me.

Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 05:21 AM
  #32  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
I think the tail lights and trunk are throwing you off.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #34  
rxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: NY
A couple of things about the new M5: Does anyone think that a 5.0L V-10 with an 8250 RPM redline spell reliability issues? Granted it's still only 100 HP/L, but that's still a big engine to be rev'ed up to 8250. The E46 M3 I-6 has a similiar specific output and rev's to only 8k and I've heard reliability issues with that.

How do you people think the new M5's performance will stack up to the new M3 (with V8)? I would hope the new M3 would still be the performance leader the BMW, but 500 horses is alot - even at 3900+ lbs.

Overall, I like the M5 - even with its Pontiac Grand Am tail lights :p .
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #35  
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: PRC
I like the styling personally, while I don't like the styling of the Z, 5, 6, or 7 series that much (I guess I only like the 3 series really) and I wonder what the performance figures will be. If I had a lot of money I would have an ///M. However if you are looking for reliability I think that you shouldn't be looking at a BMW.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 10:18 AM
  #36  
Don Vito's Avatar
Hall Monitor!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Balls
Anyone have news or pics on the future M3? I heard V8......
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #39  
babylou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by JeupRX-8
In regards to the reliability of the M3's 7,900-rpm I6; they had a problem with the S-54 engine on the first years model (MY2001). It was recalled and replaced with a new engine, a new 4-year, 50,000 warranty started back up after the engine was replaced. I forget what this problem was, but it was the same problem that we had on our '01 M3.

Troy J.
The rod bearings were failing. You make it sound like it was no biggie. Not true. BMW blamed many of the owners for abusing the engine and refused warranty. After more than a hundred failures they began to change their tune.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 08:38 AM
  #40  
Racer Rick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I witnessed 3 M3 engine failures in '01&'02. All the same cause; some sort of oil system problem leading to rod-bearing failures and parts coming through the side of the block.......ouch!!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 09:16 AM
  #41  
MP3Guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RX-Hachi
Jay Leno summed up my feelings on the new 5 during his review as part of R&T's Readers Choice awards show on SPEED channel. "Nice to drive. But unlike an Italian car, where you relish the chance wash every curve with love & care, this car, ehhhhh just throw it in the car wash" .

I agree- the car stirs no passion, although I'm sure it's very competent and efficient- but the true car lover sees something different in his relationship with his car.

I would sooner own a 1973 Lancia Fulvia than a four door doctor's car.


http://www.viva-lancia.com/forsale/f...estefano/6.jpg
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 08:50 PM
  #42  
rxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: NY
I agree- the car stirs no passion, although I'm sure it's very competent and efficient- but the true car lover sees something different in his relationship with his car.
I'm in a big arguement right now with a buddy I know who has a M5 on order. He's a big numbers guy - it's all about HP, torque, 0-60 and 1/4 mi. He thinks our RX-8's are slow and not worth the money. I try to tell him any car for 80-90 grand better beat a RX-8, but I don't know, I'd love to show him up with a car that costs less than half the price of his.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 07:33 PM
  #43  
InessHell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
http://www.mercedes-benz.com/omb/amg...d/cars_s65.pdf

check out that brochure
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #44  
rxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: NY
Damn, I guess if you're all about #'s that AMG65 is for you. Personally, I've never been much of a Mercedes fan for anything. I've always preferred BMW over Merc.

Last edited by rxtreme; Jul 17, 2004 at 08:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:56 PM
  #45  
scorp76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Originally Posted by rxtreme
Personally, I've never been much of a Mercedes fan for anything. I've always preferred BMW over Merc.
VERY smart man.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #46  
cueball's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: North Kingstown, RI
Originally Posted by rxtreme
I'd love to show him up with a car that costs less than half the price of his.
Sorry but I don't see that happening. The next M5 will have ungodly performance. Even on a track the RX8 will have a hard time keeping up.

You car may handle better, but any time there is anything remotely staight he will more then make it up.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #47  
rxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: NY
Sorry but I don't see that happening. The next M5 will have ungodly performance. Even on a track the RX8 will have a hard time keeping up.
No doubt!! My arguement was, though, for 80+ grand it better be able to perform. I was trying to argue that for half the price (my 8 with 10 to 15 thousand worth of mods) it would be able to beat a M5. My ultimate dream would be to buy a new Lotus Elise, engine/tranny swap a Hytech modified K20 Honda engine (probably worth about 250+ at the wheels) and blow the doors off just about anything the automotive industry can throw at it: Just pure unadultered performance!
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2004 | 12:34 AM
  #49  
Spazm's Avatar
~~> Next 10 miles
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
People are talking like the M will handle like a beast...its a freakin' BMW...
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2004 | 12:23 AM
  #50  
moogs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Allen, TX
so the m5 is gonna be around $80,000??
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.