2004 Nissan Murano SL AWD 14K Review
#1
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 Nissan Murano SL AWD 14K Review
Shortly before I got my RX-8, my wife (then fiance) bought a 2004 Nissan Murano SL AWD. We've had the truck for just over 14,000 miles and about 20 months.
We're not "SUV people". We're sports car people. In fact, after a great deal of research, investigation and test-driving, my fiance had narrowed her car search down to two finalists: the Murano and the RX-8. Since she felt she needed a larger vehicle, she went with the Murano.
The Murano is, in my opinion, the perfect $30-$40K SUV for sports car people. Having been used to sports cars my entire life, I can honestly say that I genuinely enjoy driving the Murano, from a performance standpoint. I've rented lots of SUVs on business, and nothing comes close in terms of balance, throttle response, suspension, turn-in, and overall feeling of confidence and stability.
It comes with a CVT transmission, which is unintrusive when you're not thinking about it, but entertaining when you are thinking about it. The SL has an "S" gear (second? sport?) which raises the RPMs at cruise to offer even better immediate throttle tip-in.
The SE model replaces the "S" gear with an autostick-style sport shift, and offers an even tighter suspension.
Only issue was an alternator recall which was resolved. We have been getting 15-16 MPG city. Magazines claim the 0-60 time is around 7.4s, and the quarter-mile is in the 15s range.
So, if you're a sports car person who needs an SUV, I would highly recommend checking out the Nissan Murano. We love ours, and wouldn't change a thing.
We're not "SUV people". We're sports car people. In fact, after a great deal of research, investigation and test-driving, my fiance had narrowed her car search down to two finalists: the Murano and the RX-8. Since she felt she needed a larger vehicle, she went with the Murano.
The Murano is, in my opinion, the perfect $30-$40K SUV for sports car people. Having been used to sports cars my entire life, I can honestly say that I genuinely enjoy driving the Murano, from a performance standpoint. I've rented lots of SUVs on business, and nothing comes close in terms of balance, throttle response, suspension, turn-in, and overall feeling of confidence and stability.
It comes with a CVT transmission, which is unintrusive when you're not thinking about it, but entertaining when you are thinking about it. The SL has an "S" gear (second? sport?) which raises the RPMs at cruise to offer even better immediate throttle tip-in.
The SE model replaces the "S" gear with an autostick-style sport shift, and offers an even tighter suspension.
Only issue was an alternator recall which was resolved. We have been getting 15-16 MPG city. Magazines claim the 0-60 time is around 7.4s, and the quarter-mile is in the 15s range.
So, if you're a sports car person who needs an SUV, I would highly recommend checking out the Nissan Murano. We love ours, and wouldn't change a thing.
#4
I’ve had my SE AWD since July of 03 and it’s a great vehicle. Only thing I might have wanted more at the time was an FX 35 but they are costly. The handling is very good for something with such a high center of gravity and weighs 2 tons. I have to really hit a corner hard to feel any body roll. If you need more space and still like a lively drive I’d highly recommend it.
#5
Originally Posted by trash259
Still looks like ***
#6
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obviously appearance is entirely subjective (with the notable exception of the Pontiac Aztek). We liked the styling a lot better than just about every other SUV out there in or near the price range. In my opinion, the new Lexus RX actually looks better than the Murano, but you're buying comfort and giving up a lot of sport.
We initially liked the FX the best, until my wife saw the interior. Total show-stopper for her, and I don't generally agonize over interior materials but back in '04 the inside looked VERY cheap to me (I'd bet they fixed that since). I also can't get over the fact that the FX reminds me of a giant gym shoe. I'm not saying it isn't attractive... just looks like a damn shoe to me.
Glad to hear there are other Murano fans around here.
We initially liked the FX the best, until my wife saw the interior. Total show-stopper for her, and I don't generally agonize over interior materials but back in '04 the inside looked VERY cheap to me (I'd bet they fixed that since). I also can't get over the fact that the FX reminds me of a giant gym shoe. I'm not saying it isn't attractive... just looks like a damn shoe to me.
Glad to hear there are other Murano fans around here.
#7
Originally Posted by trash259
Still looks like ***
I'm not a fan of the styling either, but that's an immature comment. I do like the FX series from infiniti though and they seem to be the same basic vehicle.
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
im not sure but i believe fx series is based on the G35/M RWD FM platform while Murano is based on the FWD Altima platform? if thats the case, when equiped with AWD, i dont think theres much difference at all besides slight bais in wieght distribution. I personally like the Xterra the most. hehe, but i like the exhaust of the murano and fx. they are even slightly louder than my g coupe, i can also imagine the exhaust note might bother some people at the same time lol.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When my wife was looking for a new car she considered several SUVs in under $30K category (we needed a bigger car in addition to my Rx-8). Murano was the first choice initially. But both she and myself were not impressed with riding qualities. Moreover additional airbags were only available together with luxury package, which brought price over our top limit. She ended up buying Nissan X-terra. Though less refined (since it based on a truck platform) this is much better SUV for the money. It also runs 1/4 mile in 7.5 sec., and you can take it off road. She consistently gets 20-21 MPG in mostly highway ride.
#11
Has the whole shit.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice choice! Glad to hear you're enjoying it! If I had to get an SUV in that general range, I'd only have 3 choices - X3, Murano and FX. Sure, there are maybe two other SUVs I actually like, but those are the best choices based on their price range.
#12
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
im not sure but i believe fx series is based on the G35/M RWD FM platform while Murano is based on the FWD Altima platform?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post