Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

06 wrx

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #26  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
So I like big women, you like big cars?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:19 AM
  #27  
PaulieWalnuts's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
That 307 is nice.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #28  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
One question I would ask is why would they give the regular WRX a 2.5L, unless they want to cut their own throat on the STI's ? Unless they will enlarge the displacement of the STI as well, but this is a big delineation point between the WRX & the STI, but take that away & how can you justify the large price differential of the 2. This would kill the market for the STI (unless it gets a hp as well).
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #29  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Fanman
One question I would ask is why would they give the regular WRX a 2.5L, unless they want to cut their own throat on the STI's ? Unless they will enlarge the displacement of the STI as well, but this is a big delineation point between the WRX & the STI, but take that away & how can you justify the large price differential of the 2. This would kill the market for the STI (unless it gets a hp as well).
Well considering the STi is a 2.0l in most markets with the same ej20 as the WRX I highly doubt it. The STi still has a 6 speed, DCCD, Brembos, larger intercooler, larger turbo, higher volume injectors, better tires, BBS wheels, various body molding, better suspension, more horssepower, and fancier seats over the standard WRX even if you do put the 2.5l in it. Try doing all that to a WRX aftermarket and you're well over the 8k price difference. The WRX would most likely be rated at 230hp with the 2.5l, still 70hp down from the STi.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:43 AM
  #30  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
It would only go up 3 hp ? It's already rated at 227 hp with the 2.0L engine.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:47 AM
  #31  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Fanman
It would only go up 3 hp ? It's already rated at 227 hp with the 2.0L engine.
Yep, but that would be a bit underrated like it is in the Forster XT so it's probably really closer to 240hp. The 2.5l doesn't do a whole lot to raise hp but it does give you more down low and a smoother torque curve.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
PotatoCannon
New Member Forum
13
Sep 6, 2015 11:48 AM
pelucidor
General Automotive
30
Aug 16, 2004 10:46 AM
fengshui
RX-8 Racing
15
Jul 11, 2003 05:40 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.