UK registration letters
#26
Prodigal Wankler
Thread Starter
Originally posted by DoomWolf
Yes, it's a much easier system (IMO) than elsewhere. At least 99% of cars here (the ones that haven't had private plates) can have their age judged by a glance at the registration plate.
Yes, it's a much easier system (IMO) than elsewhere. At least 99% of cars here (the ones that haven't had private plates) can have their age judged by a glance at the registration plate.
I hope it doesn't appear that I'm poking fun at the system; I'm genuinely curious. I thought that the year-letter system was originally introduced because they had run out of numbers and this was a way to provide more, yet it seems to have segued into a de-facto date stamp!
#27
Prodigal Wankler
Thread Starter
Originally posted by shahpor
Hey, this is the most activity I have seen on this part of the forum for some time. :D
Hey, this is the most activity I have seen on this part of the forum for some time. :D
#29
Mucho Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Herts - UK
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
eccles - Feel free to poke fun at the system. It is pathetic !
You are quite right - why should anyone need to know how old a car is at a glace ?
Fact is that we Brits are even sadder than that - a large proportion of us buy new cars BECAUSE ours are looking old (on the plate). i.e. people want to be seen in a car less than 3 years old or something.
The whole change to 2 new registrations a year was to give the car industry a boost. It used to be something stupid like 50% of all new cars were bought in August (so that people had the full 12 months on their 'new' plate ).
They changed to 2 new plates/year so now the peak sales are in Sep/March.
This is why the UK release of the RX8 (the reason we are all here , lest we forget) is so critical. The car is scheduled for release on 31st July. Assuming this happens the car will be on an '03' plate. If we wait 4 more weeks we get the car on a '53' plate.
"So what ? " you cry ! Well , when it comes to resale , a car registered on 31st August on an 03 plate will be worth less than an identical car registered on 1st September on a 53 plate.
How sad are we ?
Personally - I will go for the 31July option. I wanna drive it , not read it ! !
Morgan.
You are quite right - why should anyone need to know how old a car is at a glace ?
Fact is that we Brits are even sadder than that - a large proportion of us buy new cars BECAUSE ours are looking old (on the plate). i.e. people want to be seen in a car less than 3 years old or something.
The whole change to 2 new registrations a year was to give the car industry a boost. It used to be something stupid like 50% of all new cars were bought in August (so that people had the full 12 months on their 'new' plate ).
They changed to 2 new plates/year so now the peak sales are in Sep/March.
This is why the UK release of the RX8 (the reason we are all here , lest we forget) is so critical. The car is scheduled for release on 31st July. Assuming this happens the car will be on an '03' plate. If we wait 4 more weeks we get the car on a '53' plate.
"So what ? " you cry ! Well , when it comes to resale , a car registered on 31st August on an 03 plate will be worth less than an identical car registered on 1st September on a 53 plate.
How sad are we ?
Personally - I will go for the 31July option. I wanna drive it , not read it ! !
Morgan.
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Guildford
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I too will be taking delivery as soon as possible. The new system is supposed to lessen the impact on the cars value of the registration plate, and so encourage car buyers to spread their purchases over the whole year. It's much better for the industry to have a steady flow of car purchases, and not have to stockpile them up for a couple of months ahead of 1st August.
For some reason us Brits like to compare car ages. Some kind of macho crap probably. (Mines newer than yours !!)
For some reason us Brits like to compare car ages. Some kind of macho crap probably. (Mines newer than yours !!)
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by eccles
Perhaps that's what's puzzling me. I mean, who really cares how old a car is at a glance? If you need to know, then surely you'll check the VIN number or some other more permanent identifying mark rather than rely purely on the registration number, no? What is the benefit of having the year of first registration (or earlier) displayed at both ends of the vehicle?
Perhaps that's what's puzzling me. I mean, who really cares how old a car is at a glance? If you need to know, then surely you'll check the VIN number or some other more permanent identifying mark rather than rely purely on the registration number, no? What is the benefit of having the year of first registration (or earlier) displayed at both ends of the vehicle?
The only other way to tell how old a car is is on the registration document.
Shahpor
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jimbobjoe
For some reason us Brits like to compare car ages. Some kind of macho crap probably. (Mines newer than yours !!)
For some reason us Brits like to compare car ages. Some kind of macho crap probably. (Mines newer than yours !!)
The other thing that really affects re-sale here is distance travelled. For some reason people here believe that once a car has reached 100,000 miles it is dead and the value drops dramatically. Modern cars are designed to travel more than this and should still be reasonably reliable if well maintained. It is just one of those misconceptions.
Shahpor
#33
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I don't understand is why the new registrations are March and September. Surely it would have been simpler for 0 registrations to start in January and 5s in July. At the moment a 52 registration could have been registered in February 2003.
The end of the prefix system gave them the opportunity to bring in a much better system, but all they did was carry on the old one in a new form (albeit with more obvious regional idenification).
I just hope we don't eventually get a situation where certain regional registrations are worth more than other from areas deemed as 'less desirable'.
The end of the prefix system gave them the opportunity to bring in a much better system, but all they did was carry on the old one in a new form (albeit with more obvious regional idenification).
I just hope we don't eventually get a situation where certain regional registrations are worth more than other from areas deemed as 'less desirable'.
#36
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Guildford
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DoomWolf
What I don't understand is why the new registrations are March and September. Surely it would have been simpler for 0 registrations to start in January and 5s in July. At the moment a 52 registration could have been registered in February 2003.
.................
What I don't understand is why the new registrations are March and September. Surely it would have been simpler for 0 registrations to start in January and 5s in July. At the moment a 52 registration could have been registered in February 2003.
.................
#37
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jimbobjoe
January is a bad time for the industry as no-one has any money after christmas, and July everyone is on holiday. I presume that the car industry said when would be best for them.
January is a bad time for the industry as no-one has any money after christmas, and July everyone is on holiday. I presume that the car industry said when would be best for them.
#38
Petrolhead!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DoomWolf
Which leads to the question of why should the registration system exist simply to benefit the car industry?
Which leads to the question of why should the registration system exist simply to benefit the car industry?
I'm sure it isn't there to benefit the car industry. It's the government that gets the money - and I'm sure they'd like to make as much as possible by making cars look "newer" when everyone is around and has the money to buy.
More sold cars = more registrations = more £££ to the government.
-andy-
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Touge
Canada Forum
1
09-23-2019 06:45 PM
Touge
Canada Forum
0
09-23-2015 10:51 PM
Touge
Canada Forum
0
09-01-2015 10:47 PM