Notices
Australia/New Zealand Forum They come from The Land Down Under.

Mazda RX-8 Hydrogen Version

Old Jun 22, 2004 | 02:18 AM
  #26  
jax8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: between Sydney and Brisbane
Gomezgetwithit....some of us have been raving about the Japan-only white for almost a year now. I had a Subaru SVX in pearlescent white which would suit the 8 incredibly.
Some say the white may be here next year.

apologies oh merciful moderator,
jack.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 03:08 AM
  #27  
IKnowNot'ing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Belgique
Re: They made it to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide which was causes the greenhouse e

Originally posted by labrat
...

My preference for an interim technology would be common rail diesel engines. This is a much better bet than the petrol/electric hybrid Toyota technology. It offers nearly as good fuel efficiency, and it is much better suited for passenger cars as you don't require expensive and space-consuming storage batteries. On the downside, the petrol/electric sounds environmentally sexier. And that may be thing that counts in the end.
Very nice post indeed. Can we have more of these please.

On the interim solution, common rail diesel is the direction car manufacturers have taken for the european market. And these diesel powered cars are almost as fuel efficient as the existing e-petrol hybrids.

I have nevertheless a few remarks considering this diesel technical/marketing option :

- I have yet to drive a mainstream diesel engined car that passes my very stringent NVH standards. I'm talking here about mainstream small 4 cylinder engines (up to 2.2l), not the big and smooth I/V6 and V8 exclusively limited to executive cars. Apparently the new Honda diesel engine found in the new Accord is a big step forward in term of NVH. The fact that it was designed by VTEC-san (a petrolhead) might count.
The VW/Audi solutio of 'pump-düse', is absolutely disastrous in term of NVH but is very good for emissions and performances.

- I wonder how clean, economical and performing a petrol engine could be should the car manufacturers decide to invest the same amount of ressources (and cost/unit) they did for its diesel counterparts. We don't see enough stratified charge, direct injection, turbo-charged petrol engines around here.

- Electric hybrids have the advantage to be able to become ZEV in city centres, parkings, congestioned area... But they carry a larger, heavier powertrain, hurting packaging, handling, costs and fuel economy!

- Why don't we see diesel/electric hybrids : now that must be relally economical (not as clean though).
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:23 AM
  #28  
Doctorr's Avatar
Ricer is Nicer.....
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 547
Likes: 1
From: Canada.
Cool Industrial.....

I hope this thread can stand some 'industrial' input....

It's 3am where I am, operating a huge plant, using millions of cubic feet of hydrogen to make Benzene.

You guys are right, if you need industrial quantities of H2, it will come from Methane Reformer, a very energy intensive, and none-too-greenhouse-friendly process.

Methane and steam are heated over a catalyst that breaks them down into hydrogen and carbon monoxide. It takes a LOT of energy to break up the water molecules!
Methane (CH4) and steam (H2O) becomes CO and H6. We seperate the heavy carbon compounds out, and use the hydrogen for the process. Our plant is the biggest hydrogen producer in the world.

Using the hydrogen in your car would only give you a 'warm/cuddly' feeling until you realised how much greenhouse gas was produced to make it!

Mr. Labrat is correct that methanol would be a better source of hydrogen than hydrogen compressed in a tank - it might use more energy to compress it than it would produce burning!
.
.
.
doc
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 06:18 AM
  #29  
rx-8_boi02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Initial D
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Thanks labrat for putting in a simple version for me
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 09:38 AM
  #30  
deano's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Mackay, QLD. Australia
Hey Labrat,

Would it be possible to split the hydrogen from the oxygen in the car - so that in effect you fill it up with water?

Please don't flame me if that was a real dumb question!

Deano.



Originally posted by labrat
Your comment hit the nail on the head, dbb. I would also imagine that getting hydrogen from fossil fuels is energy intensive as well. My crystal ball shows that by the year 2020, we'll be driving cars powered by fuel cells burning methanol, which is a liquid, only contains one carbon, and can be made easily from natural gas. Unfortunately, we'll probably also have to get a permit from the Department of the Environment to start up our RX-8's at classic car shows.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #31  
rotarenvy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 10
From: QLD .au
suposedly this is what top fuel cars do when you see the white flames out the pipes. aparently nitro burns clear so you should see no flame but because of the heat the h2o in the air splits and burns off the hydrogen gas giving the white flames.
might be a urban myth tho.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #32  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally posted by deano
Hey Labrat,

Would it be possible to split the hydrogen from the oxygen in the car - so that in effect you fill it up with water?

Please don't flame me if that was a real dumb question!

Deano.
I think the fundamental problem with that is that it requires enourmous amounts of energy to split the molecules - that energy has to come from somewhere.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #33  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally posted by rotarenvy
suposedly this is what top fuel cars do when you see the white flames out the pipes. aparently nitro burns clear so you should see no flame but because of the heat the h2o in the air splits and burns off the hydrogen gas giving the white flames.
might be a urban myth tho.
I suppose there is a massive amount of wasted energy (heat) coming out of the exhaust that this is entirely possible - but it obviously is wasted as well.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 08:16 PM
  #34  
labrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane Australia
As Hymee says, it requires an enormous amount of energy to dissociate water into its component atoms. Reportedly, thermite fires (the reaction of iron oxide with powdered aluminium metal to form molten iron and aluminium oxide) are hot enough to dissociate water, but you are looking at temperatures at which literally iron is a liquid. If you can see the colour of a hydrogen-oxygen flame, it is due to the presence of an impurity in the flame. Pure hydrogen oxygen flames are completely colourless
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #35  
rpm_pwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Brisvegas, Aust
This is why some extiguishers are foam / inert gas filled. Water can just feed some fires.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ASH8
Series I Tech Garage
20
Sep 26, 2022 11:55 PM
ASH8
Series II Technical and Trouble shooting
7
Oct 30, 2021 12:50 PM
J2daG1990
Series II Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
8
Sep 24, 2015 09:20 AM
dbarber
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
Jul 25, 2015 01:34 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM.