Notices
Australia/New Zealand Forum They come from The Land Down Under.

Blah! Another sad mpg tale!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
NickG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Red face Blah! Another sad mpg tale!

Following are my first month's results for the 8, compared to long term averages from my last two cars. All travelling the same weekly route to work, which involves some reasonably clear 90km/hr roads combined with the usual stop/start Sydney traffic snarl, plus of course "normal" weekend stuff:

2.8l VR6 Golf : 11.8 l/100km - this engine is hardly a paradigm of fuel efficiency.
2.5l BMW 3 series: 10.3 l/100km ( best ever result 7l/100km on a tediously steady run down the 110km/hr 'new' Hume- or whatever they call it these days!)
RX-8 : 16.1l/100km

Yup - a staggering 56% more fuel consumed than the Bimmer, in a car weighing around 100kg less. I can only hope this will improve as the engine frees up further. No wonder all that black sooty gunk gathers on the lower side of the exhaust pipe tips!

Can't say I wasn't warned though.....

Last edited by NickG; Mar 3, 2004 at 08:44 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 08:53 PM
  #2  
skc's Avatar
skc
rev it up
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 11
From: Brisbane Australia
My vehicle has been averageing around 11l/100km with mostly city driving
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #3  
Choppy's Avatar
www.rx8club.com.au
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Welcome to ROTARY
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 12:13 AM
  #4  
RXE16T's Avatar
'RX-EIGHT'
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
I believe in the old adage, "if you want economy, catch a bus".

Just wait till you buy a V8 or a turbo and then you'll see that the 8's economy's not too bad.

Or if you win the lotto and buy a Ferrari, prepare yourself to get 25-30L per 100km.... but if you had one, I guess you could afford the fuel bills.

I've had my 8 for over a month now and can't say that I am disappointed in the fuel consumption.

Believe it or not, I get 260-300kms from a full tank and I'm not the least worried or concerned.
Do the maths and you'll see you've got better consumption then me.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 01:16 AM
  #5  
NickG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Originally posted by skc
My vehicle has been averageing around 11l/100km with mostly city driving

skc there's a flaw in your argument: Brisbane isn't a city, it's a country town mate, albeit a very pleasant and sunny one :D :D
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 01:18 AM
  #6  
NickG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Originally posted by nojooc
I believe in the old adage, "if you want economy, catch a bus".

Just wait till you buy a V8 or a turbo and then you'll see that the 8's economy's not too bad.

Or if you win the lotto and buy a Ferrari, prepare yourself to get 25-30L per 100km.... but if you had one, I guess you could afford the fuel bills.

I've had my 8 for over a month now and can't say that I am disappointed in the fuel consumption.

Believe it or not, I get 260-300kms from a full tank and I'm not the least worried or concerned.
Do the maths and you'll see you've got better consumption then me.
Yup that sounds like about 17-18l/100km alright. Mental note: I simply MUST try harder!:D :D
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 01:22 AM
  #7  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
I got one of my better milages on tuesday when I filled. 512km out of 59L. I think that calc'ed to 11.5mpg. Nothing special, including traffic jams.

LS1 V8's are not too bad either. I find myself filling up with the same frequency as my SS (every 5 or 6 days), and the RX-8 is about $10 less each time.

Fuel efficency is one of the things you trade off to get an engine that is extremly small for its output, and allows the car to have a low CofG and ideal weight distribution. It is a total package. If I wanted more techno and less fuel, I would look at a Prius, and trade off performance.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 01:25 AM
  #8  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally posted by NickG
skc there's a flaw in your argument: Brisbane isn't a city, it's a country town mate, albeit a very pleasant and sunny one :D :D
My 11.5 this week included a 1 hour traffic jam crawl to work. It is only a 30 minute drive.

Thanks for acknowledging the pleasentness of the place.

You mustn't have been here for a while. It is big enough. I wouldn't want it to get like Sydaney. :D

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 01:34 AM
  #9  
skc's Avatar
skc
rev it up
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 11
From: Brisbane Australia
yes, the mass migration from Sydney has turned this country town into a proper city...with yuppie coffee shops.

I have noticed the roads have become busier over the last couple of years. My commute went from 45min to 1 hour.

Ofcause I dont complain much since the Rx 8 arrived.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:13 AM
  #10  
AMG's Avatar
AMG
trust me..this wont hurt
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia
Originally posted by NickG
skc there's a flaw in your argument: Brisbane isn't a city, it's a country town mate, albeit a very pleasant and sunny one :D :D

well then what's Adeladie ?

Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:14 AM
  #11  
AMG's Avatar
AMG
trust me..this wont hurt
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia
Originally posted by skc
yes, the mass migration from Sydney has turned this country town into a proper city...with yuppie coffee shops.

Hope you've finally got decent beer then

Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:38 AM
  #12  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Hehehe - We adopted Bundy Rum!

(Back on topic - please!)
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:48 AM
  #13  
rotarenvy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 10
From: QLD .au
I got about 500km out of my first tank. which I think is fine I'm not going to complaining about it

I was running the car in changing under 5000 rpm and never full throttle. I was trying not to go past 1/2 throttle.

the engine is brilliant due to it's flexability. you can drive round under 5000rpm easily and it's as smooth as a baby
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:56 AM
  #14  
et381's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
500km out of a tank is very good.

I drove like a grandma, kept it under 3000rpm at all times and I got 12l/100k
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 04:17 AM
  #15  
timbo's Avatar
rock-->o<--hard place
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
Hymee,

You used 59L! The tank capacity is only 61L. Hope that fuel was clean
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 04:21 AM
  #16  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Just carried out first refill at 350k's...low fuel light on, took 49 litres...or 14l/100k.

A 70 litre tank capacity would be handy....

Gomez.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 04:54 AM
  #17  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally posted by timbo
Hymee,

You used 59L! The tank capacity is only 61L. Hope that fuel was clean
Actually, I am disgusted with myself :D I still had 2 litres left

I had a good friend when I was younger (he was killed mountain climbing in NZ, March 1992). Mark F. Jansen always used to say "E is for Enough". There are a few thing I still do "in the spirit of Jansen". I better stop. I am getting sad.

And funny you mention fuel and clean. I recevied a "secret" settlement from Caltex this week. I went down and paid my bill to Mazda (for diagnosis/cleaning etc), and to celebrate my windfall I popped by HJ's on the way home and spent the left over on a 40c cone.

If can get down to 9L/100km on my trip I should get 677km out of the tank. My goal, therefore, is to get 600km. I better take a jerry can with me, just in case I have only ran out once in the '8, and once in the SS (except the time when the gausge was subject to a recall). You just don't know how much is left until you run out. Ah, Hymee, always pushing the boundaries

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:09 AM
  #18  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Does that 61L include the filler...?

Gomez
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:21 AM
  #19  
labrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane Australia
Hi Hymee, as we showed on our trip 9L/100km is feasible, but it probably requires roads with light traffic, speeds of no more than 100km/h, lots of 6th gear and cruise control, and slow acceleration to cruising speed. Does this sound like you?

I have a suspicion that the difference between 100 and 110km/h probably means and increase of at least 0.5L/100km/h.

I don't know whether this rumoured flash upgrade of the ECU firmware wrt fuel mapping will ever come to pass (or indeed whether it's dinkum), but an improvement in fuel economy wouldn't be bad. I mean, I'm not bitching about what I'm getting at present, but it might serve to reduce some of the whingeing on the forum.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:02 AM
  #20  
deano's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Mackay, QLD. Australia
I'm getting about 300km to a tank at the moment around town which sounds really bad!

But hey, you can't put a price on FUN!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:06 AM
  #21  
RXE16T's Avatar
'RX-EIGHT'
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
I used to get 200-225km from 65litres on my old S14 200sx.
Admittedly, that car was modified to an inch of its life.

By comparison, the 8 is relatively frugal.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:54 AM
  #22  
guy321's Avatar
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, Fl
How do you expect us americans to understand you when you talk with foriegn numbers?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #23  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Originally posted by guy321
How do you expect us americans to understand you when you talk with foriegn numbers?
lol, from memory, 10l/100km's is 28mpg....but thats an Imperial gallon, not a U.S one...!!!

Good luck with the maths, suffice to say, our hi power cars are thirsty too....

Gomez.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #24  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally posted by guy321
How do you expect us americans to understand you when you talk with foriegn numbers?
LOL!

Get into line with the rest of the world!

1 kilometre [km] (1000 m) = 0.6214 mile
1 mile = 1.6093 km

1 imperial gallon [gal] = 4.5461 litres
1 litre = 0.2199 imperial gallon

1 US gallon = 3.7854 litres
1 litre = 0.2641 US gallons

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #25  
rotarenvy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 10
From: QLD .au
those draining the tank to the max?
what happens when a rotar runs out of fuel? lean mixtures? I suppose this is most dangerous under high load.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.