Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

Compression Test Intrepretation Help Please

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2012 | 04:22 PM
  #1  
CRX Millennium's Avatar
Thread Starter
AA = Autox Anonymous
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Compression Test Intepretation Help Please

Had compression test done today on '04 RX-8 MT, with 99xxx miles on the clock. The temp was in low 60s, with elevation at 324ft per http://veloroutes.org. Here are numbers:

front rotor: 6.7/6.5/6.7 @239rpm
rear rotor: 6.7/6.6/6.7 @238rpm

Tech mentioned that these are healthy-looking figures, with cars needing engine replacement typically reading in 4s when calling techline and needing decarb treatment in 5s. My car sometimes cranks longer than normal when hot, but otherwise felt ok (subjective thus why I paid to get it tested).

Please help with conversion to sea-level @ 250rpm, which I thought mine falls within replacement guideline absolute-number-wise. Thanks!

Last edited by CRX Millennium; Feb 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2012 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Those are out of spec numbers according to my Android compression test app.

And according to this:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4497702781/
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2012 | 04:59 PM
  #3  
CRX Millennium's Avatar
Thread Starter
AA = Autox Anonymous
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Interesting graph you got, since it looks different than than sticky copy: http://www.twistedrotors.com/images/..._Comp_Test.jpg

I downloaded the Android RX-8 Compression Calculator mentioned (cool!), and it does say out-of-spec for 2nd chamber. However, it doesn't correct for elevation. I did find another calculator which does correct for elevation: http://foxed.ca/index.php?page=rotarycalc

In that case, the front rotor (weaker of two) has 101.7, 98.7, and 101.7 normalized. Minimum is 98.6 with standard at 120. So it seems I'm on the lower-end range-wise, but not low enough to warrant a new refurb engine?

Last edited by CRX Millennium; Feb 17, 2012 at 05:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 12:34 PM
  #4  
1.3_LittersOfFurry's Avatar
Flame On!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 6
From: New Orleans, La
Looks close

I use this chart;
https://www.rx8club.com/attachment.p...6&d=1266716801
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #5  
Footman's Avatar
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 7
From: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
^ I concur that is a better chart (more legit)
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2012 | 12:42 AM
  #6  
CRX Millennium's Avatar
Thread Starter
AA = Autox Anonymous
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
I would agree with this conclusion. How many miles are currently on your engine?
Just past 100k now. Did the test prior to 100k. For an engine with no premix regimen, a few engine flooding throughout its lifetime, I guess it's not too bad.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
38
May 14, 2024 06:57 AM
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
Feb 27, 2020 08:39 AM
Shnifty
Series I Tech Garage
23
Dec 18, 2015 12:49 PM
TJSiegrist
New Member Forum
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:29 AM
rxwilly8
New Member Forum
1
Sep 2, 2015 02:42 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.