4.77 Diff
#3
Being (new) single rocks!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,485
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have access to one from a local dealer but didn't want to purchase unless I knew for sure that it would fit. Not sure whether the 09 version is teh same as the fujita.
How do you like the mod? Noticeably quicker off the line?
How do you like the mod? Noticeably quicker off the line?
#6
The Professor
#7
Being (new) single rocks!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,485
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, read your thread. It is the reason I am so interested in this mod.
Hoping someone has done this mod using Mazda's 09 diff so I know it's safe to proceed...
Hoping someone has done this mod using Mazda's 09 diff so I know it's safe to proceed...
#9
Being (new) single rocks!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,485
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it seems if I go forward with this, I will be the first to use the 4.77 gearing from an 09 RX8. I have a rotary specialty shop confirming as to whether it will fit and should have an answer early next week
#12
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
For reference:
https://www.rx8club.com/mazmart-88/transmission-153887/
Also, onlinemazdaparts.com offers a complete kit, including the 09 ring + pinion.
http://www.trademotion.com/partlocat...catalogid=4010
I planned on it but ended up picking up the FEED unit instead...
https://www.rx8club.com/mazmart-88/transmission-153887/
Also, onlinemazdaparts.com offers a complete kit, including the 09 ring + pinion.
http://www.trademotion.com/partlocat...catalogid=4010
I planned on it but ended up picking up the FEED unit instead...
Last edited by tiltmode43; 02-05-2009 at 01:44 PM.
#16
The Professor
The argument is which one will give more total power(area under the curve)? I forgot my calculus. So if anyone wants to think up a sample problem for us they can go right ahead.
vs
vs
#18
The Professor
but really there is no point in arguing. Cause if you play forza motorsports you know that higher ratio gears will out accelerate lower ratio gears any day of the week.
#19
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
assigning arbitrary values of 3, 4, 5 to the smaller triangles yields an area of 6 square units each - total of 12 square units.
assuming proportions in the drawing that would give the larger triangle values of 6, 4, 7.21 which yields the same 12 square units of total area.
lol at static
assuming proportions in the drawing that would give the larger triangle values of 6, 4, 7.21 which yields the same 12 square units of total area.
lol at static
#21
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
As a language arts major, I will submit that my curve shall look like this:
I understand the blunt power curves/power output argument but really, is anyone offering this as a solution? Seems more of an alternate viewpoint on the subject. I fail to see the issue here, higher horsepower was unspoken of... ?? Yeesh, I feel as though I'm missing something here, touting my ignorance...
#22
Registered
I actually have many times. 4.77 is an absolute joke. A complete waste of time on a street car. A race car may be a different story depending on the track, it's rpm range, and gearing. I thought the original 4.44 was too high. That car already has to shift too many times. Why shift more often and go slower? The '09's are slower to 60 as a result. I can't understand the logic. More is not always better. Sometimes less is. The car needs what the RX-7's all had and that's a 4.10 rear end. That's plenty and it's not any slower on the street.
#23
Being (new) single rocks!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,485
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 09's changed gear ratios when they went with the new 4.77 diff, nullifying its effect.
Anyways, going to call the shop tomorrow about feasibility and cost. If the numbers don't look too bad, pretty sure I'm going to go for it. Love shifting my 8 with the AFE short shifter so shifting more isn't a problem for me
Anyways, going to call the shop tomorrow about feasibility and cost. If the numbers don't look too bad, pretty sure I'm going to go for it. Love shifting my 8 with the AFE short shifter so shifting more isn't a problem for me
#24
Registered
They did change gear ratios. However you still have to shift more and your rpms are still higher for any given speed. I wouldn't say that nullified it's effect but rather partially countered what it did.
#25
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
RG - your argument only makes sense to a certain point. Our gears are not so short that excessive shifts come into play too much. Really? You'd like a 4.1 ratio?
I respect your opinion through experience but I can't imagine the car with that gearing
I respect your opinion through experience but I can't imagine the car with that gearing