Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Feasible to shut one rotor off for cruising?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-11-2004, 05:35 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
PhineasFellOff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Feasible to shut one rotor off for cruising?

The technology has been tried before on piston engines. This fall, Honda will introduce an Accord Hybrid (with a supplementary electric assist motor) that will also have VCM (variable cylinder management), which will shut off one bank of three cylinders during hwy cruising to increase gas mileage.

Is it possible for the two-rotor Wankel to cruise on one rotor only? Could one rotor cruise efficiently and thus get greater mileage?
Old 05-11-2004, 05:38 AM
  #2  
I'm Tantalizing
 
flatso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can get that already on the new Chrysler 300 hemi
Old 05-11-2004, 05:48 AM
  #3  
04 6MT
 
waldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gaffney, SC
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gains are minimal. YTou have to figure that the now smaller engine has to work harder, using more gas. GM is gnning to use it in most of their vehicles soon, and projected savings are 15%. You can save much more than that by not driving so agressive.
Old 05-11-2004, 07:56 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
jtimbck2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I remember when I was a kid we had a 1976 Chevy Caprice station wagon -- it had a 4-barrel carburetor that would cut back to 2 barrels for cruising.
Old 05-11-2004, 09:43 AM
  #5  
Grand Poobah
 
Sue Esponte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cadillac used to have a v4-6-8...horrible failure of an engine but the newer piston shut down technologies are supposed to be a vast improvement over the past. It seems like a neat idea but in the long run I wonder how much of it is really worth while in terms of fuel savings.

-Eric
Old 05-11-2004, 09:58 AM
  #6  
GiN
ロンリードライバー
 
GiN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA/OC/LV
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Sue Esponte
Cadillac used to have a v4-6-8...horrible failure of an engine but the newer piston shut down technologies are supposed to be a vast improvement over the past. It seems like a neat idea but in the long run I wonder how much of it is really worth while in terms of fuel savings.

-Eric
My 1981 Coupe DeVille had that 4/6/8 thing. It didn't help diddlysquat. :D
Old 05-11-2004, 10:06 AM
  #7  
The Thread Hijack King
 
Gigolo Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Houston Club's Resident Lush
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The rotary engine works like a pump. It is constantly moving and sucking and blowing. I supose it could be done iwth indipendant throttle bodies, controld systems, and fuel systems for each rotor, but not as it stands now.

I would also argue that this would increase wear on the rotor that is shut off and not allow the engine to balance itself properly while running.
Old 05-11-2004, 10:18 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Senseny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Phila suburbs
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't the engine need two separate e shafts that are independent of the other for that to even be a possibility.

Last edited by Senseny; 05-11-2004 at 10:22 AM.
Old 05-11-2004, 11:26 AM
  #9  
Bert angry!
 
mamccubbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a Datsun 210 that only had three of its four cylinders working. Does that count?
Old 05-11-2004, 11:33 AM
  #10  
Ricer is Nicer.....
 
Doctorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool No gain....

Like Gigolo Jason says the rotary is basically a pump, if you shut off fuel and spark, it would still be using energy 'pumping'. If you shut the throttles, it would get worse, trying to pump a vacuum.

The piston versions worked by leaving the valves shut all the time, causing an 'air-spring effect'. The piston would compress the air, then be pushed down by it, with little net loss.
.
.
.
doc
Old 05-11-2004, 11:43 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ricks8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by waldo
Gains are minimal. YTou have to figure that the now smaller engine has to work harder, using more gas. GM is gnning to use it in most of their vehicles soon, and projected savings are 15%. You can save much more than that by not driving so agressive.
Actually, Internal Combustion Engines are most efficient when operating at full throttle. Sounds counterintuitive, but thats why a flogged econbox gets better milage then a muscle care limped along.

See this article

http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1
Old 05-11-2004, 11:46 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
IKnowNot'ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Belgique
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: No gain....

Originally posted by Doctorr
...

The piston versions worked by leaving the valves shut all the time, causing an 'air-spring effect'. The piston would compress the air, then be pushed down by it, with little net loss.
.
.
.
doc
Exact and the system works by entrapping combusted gases (instead of fresh air) into the chamber in order to keep it warmed-up.
Old 05-11-2004, 11:47 AM
  #13  
PoloRican Rotary
 
cas2themoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard of that last year, their were testing it out in Chevy trucks
Old 05-11-2004, 11:59 AM
  #14  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
we had this discussion some time ago in this thread and as mentioned- you dont need to shut off one whole rotor just skip a cycle per rotor. but this question on our urging was also put to Mazda by rotarynews.com and they answered "No". i think they are working more towards hybrid and hydrogen to increase fuel economy and decrease emissions
Old 05-11-2004, 12:27 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
88gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No it's not feasible. The e-shaft won't allow it.
Old 05-11-2004, 12:50 PM
  #16  
The Thread Hijack King
 
Gigolo Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Houston Club's Resident Lush
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ricks8
Actually, Internal Combustion Engines are most efficient when operating at full throttle. Sounds counterintuitive, but thats why a flogged econbox gets better milage then a muscle care limped along.
They are most efficient when at full throttle and at full RPM, yes, but they are not designed to run continuously at this pace. Most piston auto engines are designed to run at 30% of there rated power continuously. The opposite end if piston aircraft engines that are designed to run at 75%-80% of there rated power continuously.

Originally posted by 88gt
No it's not feasible. The e-shaft won't allow it.
The currect e-shaft won't allow it but double e-shafts have been produced in the past. The 20B had a two piece e-shaft.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jamespond24
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
11
12-01-2015 11:11 PM
TotalAutoPerformance
Vendor Classifieds
3
10-14-2015 12:29 PM
Eliseo Esquivel
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 08:28 PM
pjwermuth
RX-8 Discussion
5
09-28-2015 11:36 PM
titaneum_grey
Series I Trouble Shooting
3
09-06-2015 10:21 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Feasible to shut one rotor off for cruising?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.