Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Test Drove SLK350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-08-2005, 07:13 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Test Drove SLK350

I took my mom to check out the SLK350 today--and I was impressed. She currently has an SLK230 and this car was 3x better in every way. When I drove it, the salesman told me to 'not hold back' but I kept it sane. Of course coming out of the RX8 I was spoiled to the sharp handling, but the 350 was very solid. The interior is top notch and the convertible top is virtually silent compared to the mechanics of the 1st gen SLK. The engine note was noticible-but not obtrusive--it didn't sound as good as the VQ series V6 from Nissan though. The power (268HP) was impressive--mated with a 7 speed automatic. The specs say that the auto runs to 60 in 5.6 seconds and the Manual in 5.5 seconds--I must say it felt like it. This car felt very powerful and is quite torquey--it felt faster than the 350Z and I have no doubts that the auto SLK could dispatch the 350Z 6 spd routinely. Honestly, the SLK55 is overkill after experiencing the power band of the SLK350.
Old 01-08-2005, 07:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
There is no such thing as overkill with respect to power dre!
Glad to hear it's a solid ride, I love the looks, and can't wait to see one in person.
Old 01-08-2005, 08:05 PM
  #3  
'RX-EIGHT'
 
RXE16T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new SLK's are HOT!
My missus actually wanted me to trade my 8 in on one......... but she won't let me get a Lotus though.
Old 01-08-2005, 08:07 PM
  #4  
GotZoom
 
Dlrosie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm drooling.
Old 01-08-2005, 08:09 PM
  #5  
Attracts tree branches
 
truemagellen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
still a Mercedes...the taxi cabs of the Middle East

*cough* *cough* *crap* *cough* :p
Old 01-08-2005, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
RX8-79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M'eh. I'd take the better-handling and almost-as-fast-with-much-less power Z4 first if I wanted a high-end roadster.

I have to wonder about Benz and these 7 speed autos. Six speed autos are still relatively new, is 7 really necessary?
Old 01-08-2005, 08:49 PM
  #7  
Attracts tree branches
 
truemagellen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8-79
M'eh. I'd take the better-handling and almost-as-fast-with-much-less power Z4 first if I wanted a high-end roadster.

I have to wonder about Benz and these 7 speed autos. Six speed autos are still relatively new, is 7 really necessary?
Reminds be of a hilarious Onion article here is a quote:

"Now we're standing around with our ***** in our hands, selling three blades and a strip. Moisture or no, suddenly we're the chumps. Well, **** it. We're going to five blades."
:D :p

Here is the article, yanked from the Onion: http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~arobic.../Gillette.html
Old 01-09-2005, 10:30 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
There is no such thing as overkill with respect to power dre!
Glad to hear it's a solid ride, I love the looks, and can't wait to see one in person.
LOL--for my mom it is :p
Old 01-09-2005, 01:17 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had the previous generation SLK 230 (modded). I think if I look at another car down the line it will be the SLK 55 AMG. I'm not sure how long I will keep the RX8, but if I don't have a family in a few years I will definitely look at the SLK.
Old 01-09-2005, 02:08 PM
  #10  
Stainless
 
AQA101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new SLK is plain beautiful, true.

But it's certainly bloody expensive as well and not so much superior to the 350Z roadster (imho). Anyway, I guess that together with the new Boxter it will trash the market for the BMW Z4 in Germany.
Old 01-09-2005, 04:06 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fanman--what mods did you do to the SLK230? Also as far as the SLK being superior to the 350Z roadster--I could see the 15K price premium, the quality in the SLK is 1st rate compared to the cheap feel of the 350ZR, you also get the security of the retractable hardtop, and not to mention Mercedes cachet and resale value. The SLK350 is also slightly quicker.
Old 01-09-2005, 04:41 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
PaulieWalnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by truemagellen
still a Mercedes...the taxi cabs of the Middle East

*cough* *cough* *crap* *cough* :p
Damn nice taxi
Old 01-09-2005, 05:23 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AQA101
The new SLK is plain beautiful, true.

But it's certainly bloody expensive as well and not so much superior to the 350Z roadster (imho). Anyway, I guess that together with the new Boxter it will trash the market for the BMW Z4 in Germany.
I can't believe you are actually comparing a 350Z convertible to an SLK 350. The SLK is the antithesis of the 350Z. I was all set to purchase a 350Z counvertible touring version (leather seats) but I got the RX8 instead. The only comparison between the two is they both have 2 seats & a 6 cyl. engine, that's it. The Mercedes is a far superior vehicle in almost every way. The 350Z interior is among the worst I have ever seen. The plastic is about 2 grades lower than the RX8's, and the seating position in the 350Z is like a bathtub. The extra weight of the convertible version is readily apparent, and the 350Z convertible just wants to understeer around any aggressive corner. I would highly recommend you drive the two before proclaiming the SLK 350 as "not much superior to the 350Z roadster." Not to mention one has a folding hardtop convertible roof, and the other has a conventional (and quite a bit nosier) fabric top.

DreRX8,

I had a pulley kit, K&N air filter, Supersprint header, & Remus exhaust on my SLK 230. Fun, but still not that fast.
Old 01-09-2005, 06:01 PM
  #14  
Get in ma belly!!
 
irish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taxi please!!! :D I do like the new SLK. I'm not sure about the rear end styling. It looks a little off to me! Anybody else feel the rear looks whacky?

- Irish
Old 01-09-2005, 07:48 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Anyone know if BMW is going to make an M version of the Z4?
Old 01-10-2005, 12:20 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
RX Renesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Anyone know if BMW is going to make an M version of the Z4?
that would be NUTS!!!.... i doube it tho.... if they do i'll buy it... i like the Z4... it's sooo nice.... but it does kinda lack some power if compared to a SLK55 which i think MB will make one soon....


also.... the SLK350 may feel sooo much more powerful is probally ur used to the 230SCed engine... but this is the new 350... so there is quite a difference in power....
Old 01-10-2005, 12:23 AM
  #17  
Stainless
 
AQA101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fanman
I can't believe you are actually comparing a 350Z convertible to an SLK 350.
Well, in a way I do. You're certainly right that the comparison is not exactly "perfect" but the 20k € difference should explain the quality differences. As far as numbers go, the cars can be compared, though the Z is rather the equivalent of the Crossfire, which is in the same price range.

The real counterpart would be the new Porsche Boxter S - which is not exactly easy prey for the SLK. If you actually the price difference between Z and SLK to the SLK price you get into the new Porsche 911 convertible territory ... now that's where discussion becomes obsolete and from that point of view you're correct, that's a comparison of cars from different worlds as well.
Old 01-10-2005, 12:26 AM
  #18  
Stainless
 
AQA101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Anyone know if BMW is going to make an M version of the Z4?
The M version of the Z3 was a coupe, there is no such version of the Z4 so far. And they still have the Z8 in the high price region (not sure if it's still available tough).
Old 01-10-2005, 12:26 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
RX Renesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
y u wanna compare 350Z to SLK? one is luxuary and one is sporty... but i have to say... the 350Z do suck bad...

i also like the front of the new SLK... but the rear is just plain weird....
Old 01-10-2005, 12:36 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
hotpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tropical Island, Indian Ocean
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AQA101
The M version of the Z3 was a coupe, there is no such version of the Z4 so far. And they still have the Z8 in the high price region (not sure if it's still available tough).
The M Roadster was the M version of the Z3.
We could expect an M version of the Z4 too.
Old 01-10-2005, 12:47 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
RX Renesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hotpot
The M Roadster was the M version of the Z3.
We could expect an M version of the Z4 too.
hopefully it doesn't look liek the MZ3... with that hatchback the looks fo the Z4 could be ruined....
Old 01-10-2005, 12:50 AM
  #22  
Registered
 
hotpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tropical Island, Indian Ocean
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, the Z3 M Roadster was a convertible.
The M Coupe was the hatchback version.

Originally Posted by RX Renesis
hopefully it doesn't look liek the MZ3... with that hatchback the looks fo the Z4 could be ruined....
Old 01-11-2005, 02:18 PM
  #23  
co3
Registered User
 
co3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: milky way galaxy
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Anyone know if BMW is going to make an M version of the Z4?
"Although early reported BMW weren’t going to build an M-Power Z4 allowing the “Alpina roadster S” to top the marquee, BMW has now decided to build a Z4M, using the new forthcoming M3s 4.0 litre V8 capable of extracting 400 Bhp. Body modifications will include standard hard top, rear spoiler, upgrade brakes & 18” wheels."

source: www.bmw2002.co.uk
Old 01-11-2005, 06:12 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
RX Renesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
omg.... omfg.... that thigns gonna be a beast.... some compition for slk and clks now...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
30
06-07-2020 12:21 PM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
05-23-2019 05:46 PM
TeslaMSI
New Member Forum
11
12-10-2015 01:10 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Test Drove SLK350



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.