MarkW
03-19-2003, 03:51 PM
Im not a technical guru when it comes to cars, but I understand that where performance is concerned weight=bad and bhp=good!
Therefore a cars power to weight ratio seems more sensible than just looking at bhp.
I know there are a number of other issues here such as dare I say it - torque, and gearing etc, but I always thought that bhp/tonne was a simplistic way of comparing performance.
The RX8 accoding to 'Evo' is 1300kg and 237 bhp. That is 182bhp/tonne by my reconing.
That seems to be a seriously good figure as my 1470kg 261bhp Impreza is only 177bhp/tonne.
Other cars in the region of 180bhp/tonne are (in the gospel according to Evo):
Focus RS 169
Civic TypeR 166
TT 225 164
Alfa 156GTA 180
Audi S4 178
BMW 330i 153
S2000 191
Boxster 182
This implies that the RX8 is more than a match (in straight line performance anyway) for most of the cars listed above all things being equal. Am I mssing something or is this the case?
Therefore a cars power to weight ratio seems more sensible than just looking at bhp.
I know there are a number of other issues here such as dare I say it - torque, and gearing etc, but I always thought that bhp/tonne was a simplistic way of comparing performance.
The RX8 accoding to 'Evo' is 1300kg and 237 bhp. That is 182bhp/tonne by my reconing.
That seems to be a seriously good figure as my 1470kg 261bhp Impreza is only 177bhp/tonne.
Other cars in the region of 180bhp/tonne are (in the gospel according to Evo):
Focus RS 169
Civic TypeR 166
TT 225 164
Alfa 156GTA 180
Audi S4 178
BMW 330i 153
S2000 191
Boxster 182
This implies that the RX8 is more than a match (in straight line performance anyway) for most of the cars listed above all things being equal. Am I mssing something or is this the case?