View Full Version : K&N V.2 Typhoon intake with racing beat duct?


Blazed
05-16-2007, 03:54 PM
I know people have claimed that this is possible, but i have not seen anyone who has actually attached the racing beat duct to the K&N typhoon intake. Can someone please let me know if you have done this, and please post any video or sound clips. Thanks for your help. Oh, and i tried searching but most of the treads went off topic and no one really discussed the duct being added to the intake and how it would be done.

dgrx8
05-16-2007, 04:27 PM
i have this combo...

-the k&n remains an open box, so it still sucks up hot ambient air. the duct just helps bring in cooler air from outside.

-i installed these seperately... first the k&n typhoon2, then the rb duct about a year after. the addition of the duct only added a bit of better response at the upper rpm range. it goes completely unnoticed at lower rpm's.

-i also cut apart my vfad to get a better seal b/w the stock airbox undertray (which is kept in place) and the rb duct.

-bypass the coolant from the throttle body and you're good to go...

TheRed8
05-22-2007, 02:03 AM
I am thinking of purchasing a K&N typhoon cold air intake and I was wondering if it is worth the money? I cannot find one for cheaper than 246. Does it actually increase horsepower and make better gas milleage to a point that it is worth the money?? Thanks for the help

swoope
05-22-2007, 03:11 AM
I am thinking of purchasing a K&N typhoon cold air intake and I was wondering if it is worth the money? I cannot find one for cheaper than 246. Does it actually increase horsepower and make better gas milleage to a point that it is worth the money?? Thanks for the help

yes and no, no and yes.

beers :beer:

SE3PSynergy
05-22-2007, 09:05 AM
no air intake regardless what company makes it is going to give you substantial power... I have ordered my v.2 k&n soley because I heard the sound of one and I really liked it. If I gain 1whp then cool, but that's not what I'm going in and spending 250+ for.

TheRed8
05-23-2007, 01:33 AM
no air intake regardless what company makes it is going to give you substantial power... I have ordered my v.2 k&n soley because I heard the sound of one and I really liked it. If I gain 1whp then cool, but that's not what I'm going in and spending 250+ for.

I totally agree, I heard on on my friend's car and loved it, I was just wondering if it actually helped the car out at all because thats what he told me...thanks guys

SE3PSynergy
05-23-2007, 01:35 AM
Some people still think an intake will give them 5+whp. It's just kinda funny realizing it will never change, and listening to them claim after their i/e/h they are now pushing 220 whp on their 8's hahha too good. The sound really is nice though, verrrrry aggressive.

Trekk
05-23-2007, 07:16 PM
http://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php?p=1632332&postcount=159

I think 5 hp is very possible peak with the K&Nv2. You also have to factor in that a car isn't moving on a dyno. A few fans aren't going to cool a car the same as 50-120mph winds.

Side note I'd pimp that Del-Sol ,turbo,dohc with pegs and shocks. Lucky!

SE3PSynergy
05-23-2007, 07:26 PM
Perhaps, I'm guessing I have another test in order then, since I will be receiving my v.2 intake on the 31st. We'll see if it actually helps or not.

staticlag
05-23-2007, 07:35 PM
I put a boost gauge on my sealed REVi, at 70mph+ there is no vacuum. I took it up to 90 ish and it seemed to hold at 0, might have been slightly positive or negative because its just a regular boost gauge that I was measuring it with.

BTW, I hooked into after the throttle body, so those are actual readings.

scsi
05-23-2007, 07:37 PM
id like an intake some day for weight reduction forward of the front axles :) teamrx8 said so, i wonder how much weight can actually be saved though. as for power, im not gonna hold my breath

staticlag
05-23-2007, 08:27 PM
id like an intake some day for weight reduction forward of the front axles :) teamrx8 said so, i wonder how much weight can actually be saved though. as for power, im not gonna hold my breath

probably 12-16lbs for the REvi, less of a loss for an intake made of more metal. Removing the VFAD of course.

scsi
05-23-2007, 08:34 PM
so you're saying the REVi is 12-16lbs less than stock? that doesnt sound right..

NgoRX8
05-23-2007, 08:37 PM
the VFAD does weigh somethin, but really that big a difference?

scsi
05-23-2007, 08:50 PM
wtf is a VFAD?

NgoRX8
05-23-2007, 08:58 PM
VFAD stands for Variable Fresh Air Duct

it's basically the same as the ram air duct, located under the black plastic 'diverter' panel right next to the bumper (when under the hood).
it flows the intake air into the stock intake like the ram air duct, but reduces noise through its long piping as well. it's removed when the revi intake is installed (whether or not the ram air duct is used).

scsi
05-23-2007, 09:00 PM
oh so thats what that thing is! i saw it when they were working on my body kit :) thanks!

SE3PSynergy
05-23-2007, 09:22 PM
sounds like a STD to me.

staticlag
05-23-2007, 09:57 PM
RevI is pretty light

Blazed
05-23-2007, 11:09 PM
I was thinking about getting the revi however most people do not know that it is not legal for road use in california, which becomes a problem during smog. It even states on the racing beat website that it is for racing vehicle only and not to be used on highways. Also, i have read that the k&n has a louder and nicer sound to it which is why i wanted it. So back to my original question, does anyone have a sound or video clip of the k&n v.2 intake with the racing beat ram air duct? Is it worth purchasing the ram air duct?

scsi
05-24-2007, 01:33 AM
i like the REVi cuz it looks nice, but id be more into saving weight if possible. anybody know the actual weight difference between the stock unit and the REVi?

dgrx8
05-24-2007, 11:12 AM
So back to my original question, does anyone have a sound or video clip of the k&n v.2 intake with the racing beat ram air duct? Is it worth purchasing the ram air duct?

there is no difference in sound after adding the duct to the kn v2. but, like my post up top... it helps out a bit especially here in miami!!!

TheRed8
05-24-2007, 11:45 AM
there is no difference in sound after adding the duct to the kn v2. but, like my post up top... it helps out a bit especially here in miami!!!

The one I heard was on a Toyota Tundra, not a RX8 and it sounded a lot louder than stock. His engine was not heard at all until he bought the K&N intake, and now its really loud...I dont know if it will be the same for Rx8, hope that helps

dgrx8
05-24-2007, 11:56 AM
The one I heard was on a Toyota Tundra, not a RX8 and it sounded a lot louder than stock. His engine was not heard at all until he bought the K&N intake, and now its really loud...I dont know if it will be the same for Rx8, hope that helps

:spank:
what business does a tundra have on this forum?

Trekk
05-24-2007, 01:34 PM
The K&N2 is super light, and is suppose to offer more top end(to go with my flash)

The stock airbox is 1 heavy mofo. When you pop open the stock air box you;ll see hundreds (guess) of rows of plastic.(supports?) Those add alot of weight to the box. I'm guessing its to keep the box from sagging under all the heat.

nycgps
05-24-2007, 10:20 PM
The K&N2 is super light, and is suppose to offer more top end(to go with my flash)

The stock airbox is 1 heavy mofo. When you pop open the stock air box you;ll see hundreds (guess) of rows of plastic.(supports?) Those add alot of weight to the box. I'm guessing its to keep the box from sagging under all the heat.

They use those plastic pieces to keep the noise to a minimum.

Yes Stock airbox is pretty heavy, if you compare them to K&N version 2 (cant speak for REVi box, I dont have it)

Trekk
05-24-2007, 10:45 PM
Danger here it is K&N V2 on video.
Plug your ears and brace your self!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cFWDJlRoAo


Meh... its not that loud unless your on the throttle pretty heavy. It does scream in the 7k area.

nycgps
05-24-2007, 11:10 PM
I dont need that video, maybe someone else.

You know I get this sound, LIVE, everyday :P

Trekk
05-24-2007, 11:14 PM
Yeah I know, it was more for the OP.

I love when I punch it on the expressway and the people around me, look over like WTF is that sound.
I should of added a fly by in that video.

nycgps
05-24-2007, 11:33 PM
I know EXACTLY how you feel buddy .... EXACTLY ...

User24
05-25-2007, 12:09 AM
So it sounds very close to stock, except louder?

nycgps
05-25-2007, 08:40 AM
if u go easy on it, yes

once it gets over 5K rpm ....

but I guess all aftermarket intake sound like stock, as long as u dont go wot.

Keef
05-25-2007, 11:40 AM
I had this setup... with my own little addition of duct tape and left over VFAD pieces... On a long drive my engine kept on dieing, and I began too really freak out... My friend (who had his Frontier stacked too the top with moving items), decided too stop at a local gas station too make sure everything was secure, and I decided too check why my engine kept on dieing...

Long story short, duct tape won't hold too long inside our intakes.... Once I removed the left over VFAD pieces(and garbles off duct tape) though I could tell at highway speeds that my 8 with the setup that this forum discusses could breath much easier...

And I know this also might sound a little absurd but I always used too get *at best* 60 miles too a quarter tank, now that I removed the VFAD pieces (that I thought would help too direct the air), my 8 somehow got 70 miles without getting close too consuming a quarter tank...

I'm wondering now if fabricating a plastic piece too cover the intake would be a good idea. My engine died after driving on the highway for a while... I know it won't happen again because no duct tape is in the way. But still heat is an issue

Keef
05-30-2007, 09:59 PM
I also figure this is the best setup for a stock NA. Alone the K&N ver. 2 promises some 9 hp, but with a ram duct at 40 miles it's alot different than dynoing when it's standing still.

Another issue I seem too be getting is that I normally try too stay in nuetral for a while and essentially coast in an attempt too save gas. I noticed that with this setup, coasting over 45-50 mph causes my engine too awkwardly sway from some 250 RPM too 850/900 RPM...

It makes me wonder if creating a separate throttle body (kinda what the VFAD did) would be a good idea in some situations... Any ideas? Or am I thread killer:?

Trekk
05-30-2007, 11:31 PM
I also figure this is the best setup for a stock NA. Alone the K&N ver. 2 promises some 9 hp, but with a ram duct at 40 miles it's alot different than dynoing when it's standing still.

Another issue I seem too be getting is that I normally try too stay in nuetral for a while and essentially coast in an attempt too save gas. I noticed that with this setup, coasting over 45-50 mph causes my engine too awkwardly sway from some 250 RPM too 850/900 RPM...

It makes me wonder if creating a separate throttle body (kinda what the VFAD did) would be a good idea in some situations... Any ideas? Or am I thread killer:?

1) rolling in neutral is something you can get a ticket for.
2) you (in most cases) burn more gas in neutral then when in gear.

StefYVR
05-31-2007, 12:29 AM
I'm very frustrated, just finished typing a long reply with test specs etc. and it disappeared when i clicked on submit... Ahhh.

Well the short version is as follows.

I've had teh Mazdaspeed CAI on for about 2 weeks and HATE it. Loss of low end power and huge gain in noise at full throttle with NO noticeable gain in power.
So I used a G-Tech and experimented with 3 different setups. Here is what I found. (Car full fuel, no junk in the trunk, just me = 1500kg at the weighscale.)
Just FYI, Full fuel car only no passenger or driver = 1400kg (accurate to +/- 10kg).

Stock Intake = 184HP

Stock intake with drop in K&N = 190HP

Mazdaspeed CAI = 185HP; but slower throttle response + loss of low end power.

Did some research and found some AEM test documents that show the K&N flows at least 2 to 3.5 times more air (depending on the amount of air flowed) than most of the other filters available and it DOES NOT let more dirt through; thats a myth.

The calculated RENESIS maximum engine air flow at WOT @ 8000rpm is just under 400CFM. Most stock filters and even the AEM DRYFLOW (Madzaspeed filter) cannot flow that much air without a significant pressure drop.
According to the graphs its almost a 5" water pressure drop for the DRYFLOW and only a 2.5" water drop for the K&N, with "NO DUST LEAKAGE" detected.

So in my opinion If you want to keep the good low end response and get decent power gains throughout the rev range, if you are still under warranty, use the stock intake with a K&N drop in panel filter #33-2284 (rated to 441CFM with no noticeable pressure drop). It will flow as much as your engine will ever demand in an unboosted setup.

Out of warranty, the Raceing Beat REVi with the ram air attachment.
This keeps the tuned intake horn for smooth air delivery and uses a free flowing short ram design and still maintains a big box for that accumulator effect to help low end throttle response. Rated for a 10HP increase at 8000rpm.

Honestly though, for an extra 4HP, is $350plus really worth it ?
I'd say the stock setup and a K&N panel filter is a pretty good bang for your buck. Save that extra $300 towards a free flowing exhaust system. Thats the other half of maximising your engine's breathing efficiency.

Hope this info was useful.

SE3PSynergy
05-31-2007, 02:40 AM
I appreciate your efforts, but the g-tech is about as trust worthy as a stripper with a coke addiction. That is all.

SE3PSynergy
05-31-2007, 02:57 AM
Oh yeah.. I received the V.2 in the mail today, I got out of work at 9 and was going to wait to put it in but like most of you I just couldn't wait. I had already let it soak in the oil for about 5 hours while I was on break from work, so it was dried out fairly well for the install.

The install is fairly straight forward and all, took a little longer than I expected but GODDAMN i forgot how good this thing sounds. It's honestly the best of both worlds, you don't need to worry about droning or getting a lot of attention while driving normally... but once you punch it the thing just screams. In a very sexy- throaty way. I like it MUCH more than the AEM i ditched...

swoope
05-31-2007, 04:51 AM
I put a boost gauge on my sealed REVi, at 70mph+ there is no vacuum. I took it up to 90 ish and it seemed to hold at 0, might have been slightly positive or negative because its just a regular boost gauge that I was measuring it with.

BTW, I hooked into after the throttle body, so those are actual readings.


the big deal at over 60 mph. is intake temp.... if you can monitor it well you know.. after 100mph.. well.

beers :beer:

nycgps
05-31-2007, 07:55 AM
Oh yeah.. I received the V.2 in the mail today, I got out of work at 9 and was going to wait to put it in but like most of you I just couldn't wait. I had already let it soak in the oil for about 5 hours while I was on break from work, so it was dried out fairly well for the install.

The install is fairly straight forward and all, took a little longer than I expected but GODDAMN i forgot how good this thing sounds. It's honestly the best of both worlds, you don't need to worry about droning or getting a lot of attention while driving normally... but once you punch it the thing just screams. In a very sexy- throaty way. I like it MUCH more than the AEM i ditched...

Now you know exactly how I feel ...

dgrx8
05-31-2007, 10:03 AM
i'd like to know exactly what it is about the k&n v.2 w/ rb duct combo that causes such an erratic idle. i only started experiencing the idling issues and engine shut offs in traffic after installing the duct to my k&n. and btw, i don't have the mesh screen installed either, but all was good til i installed the duct. i used a piece of the vfad to seal the connection also... what gives? i think i'm gonna try sealing the whole thing w/ some plexi...
what do u guys think is going on???

Trekk
05-31-2007, 10:21 AM
i'd like to know exactly what it is about the k&n v.2 w/ rb duct combo that causes such an erratic idle. i only started experiencing the idling issues and engine shut offs in traffic after installing the duct to my k&n. and btw, i don't have the mesh screen installed either, but all was good til i installed the duct. i used a piece of the vfad to seal the connection also... what gives? i think i'm gonna try sealing the whole thing w/ some plexi...
what do u guys think is going on???

I use the screan and have no problems. I made a pipe that connects the ram to the tray so all the air goes right into the filter area.

StefYVR
05-31-2007, 05:04 PM
I think you missed my point. I know the G-Tech is not 100% accutrate, but the main point was no matter how good your intake piping is, if you have a restrictive filter you've just wasted a lot of $$$.
For the RENESIS motor, you need a filter tha can flow 400CFM with negligable pressure drop. So far the only 2 on teh market that can meet those specs are the APEXi filters and the K&N filters.
The Mazdaspeed CAI is not good because of the AEM filter they are using. Raceing beat uses a K&N filter, it just their box is better than the setup that K&N sells.

dgrx8
05-31-2007, 05:16 PM
i just installed a metal mesh onto my k&n.
what are the chances of that thing getting sucked up into my tb? i couldn't find the rubber gasket that came w/ my k&n kit...

Trekk
05-31-2007, 05:19 PM
Raceing beat uses a K&N filter, it just their box is better than the setup that K&N sells.

Better how? Makes less noise and hp for more money?

nycgps
05-31-2007, 06:07 PM
I think you missed my point. I know the G-Tech is not 100% accutrate, but the main point was no matter how good your intake piping is, if you have a restrictive filter you've just wasted a lot of $$$.
For the RENESIS motor, you need a filter tha can flow 400CFM with negligable pressure drop. So far the only 2 on teh market that can meet those specs are the APEXi filters and the K&N filters.
The Mazdaspeed CAI is not good because of the AEM filter they are using. Raceing beat uses a K&N filter, it just their box is better than the setup that K&N sells.

The K&N Version 2 is the only product that gives you maximum high-end. Thats why RB recommended it if thats what you want.

Blazed
06-07-2007, 05:39 AM
Does anyone know if the K&N V.2 intake is street legal in California? Will you have a problem with smog, or is it CARB exempt. The racing beat revi is only legal for off road racing vehicle so you have to change it for smog testing. This isnt a problem with the K&N right?

QBallz
06-07-2007, 03:51 PM
Does anyone know if the K&N V.2 intake is street legal in California? Will you have a problem with smog, or is it CARB exempt. The racing beat revi is only legal for off road racing vehicle so you have to change it for smog testing. This isnt a problem with the K&N right?

The K&N v2 is is CARB legal on the 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006. Its NOT legal on a 2007 though.

nycgps
06-08-2007, 07:33 AM
Does anyone know if the K&N V.2 intake is street legal in California? Will you have a problem with smog, or is it CARB exempt. The racing beat revi is only legal for off road racing vehicle so you have to change it for smog testing. This isnt a problem with the K&N right?

is legal for off road racing only because RB didnt pay to get the CARB exempt for streets. is like couple thousand bucks, I think.

K&N Ver 2 like Qballz said, is ok from 04-06. not 07 *yet*