Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

volk ce28n

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #1  
staticlag's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Professor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 7
From: Omaha, NE
volk ce28n

whats the largest 17" ce28n that you can fit on the rx8 without rubbing? Would a 9" fit? a 10"?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #2  
whoneedspistons's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
well why would you put a 17 inch rim on a car that is stock 18 inches? seems a little wierd but to each there own
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #3  
unreal89's Avatar
I don't mind pistons
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Cal Poly Pomona
Originally Posted by whoneedspistons
well why would you put a 17 inch rim on a car that is stock 18 inches? seems a little wierd but to each there own
My guess would be:
Volk = light
17" = light
17" Volks = Super Light

Not everyone wants rims that are for bling. The fact he wants wide wheels indicates he wants performance.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 11:59 PM
  #4  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
I agree. I for one absolutely hate upsizing on wheels as it adds weight, but at least I know the reason people do it. I can't really say I understand the viewpoint, but I know what it is at least.

By the way, how wide depends on the offset of the wheel and whether you wish to roll the fenders or not. It seems most people are able to take a 9.5" wide wheel with 45mm offset. Anymore and we start hearing rubbing.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 01:44 AM
  #5  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
my 19 inch volks weigh less than my stock 18's..
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #6  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by XDEEDUBBX
my 19 inch volks weigh less than my stock 18's..
But your Volks in 17 or 18 inch would weigh less than your 19s.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #7  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by LionZoo
But your Volks in 17 or 18 inch would weigh less than your 19s.
I dont know this for certain but the Enkie RPF1's 18x9.5 would probably weigh as much as the 17" volks and cost less. Approx. $308 per rim.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #8  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
CE28Ns are ridiculously light. In the 18x8 size they're 14.7 pounds. However, the thread starter would have better luck with weight savings if he went with the 18s as the 17 inch CE28Ns are only a few ounces lighter and the tire choices for 18 inches is actually slightly lighter and so would balance things out. However, if he's not looking to keep about the same rolling diameter, then 17s would be the way to go.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #9  
Endless Rotaries's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Here you go:

17x9.5 +47 would be ideal and clear big brakes.

they also make a 10" +45 which is cutting it close, all comes down to tire size you choose. If you're interested we should be able to offer you a great deal. Let me know if you're interested.

Rishie
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #10  
gr8rx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LionZoo
CE28Ns are ridiculously light. In the 18x8 size they're 14.7 pounds. However, the thread starter would have better luck with weight savings if he went with the 18s as the 17 inch CE28Ns are only a few ounces lighter and the tire choices for 18 inches is actually slightly lighter and so would balance things out. However, if he's not looking to keep about the same rolling diameter, then 17s would be the way to go.

actually my 18 x 8.5 ce28's weigh in at a huge 13.7 lbs.......
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #11  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by gr8rx
actually my 18 x 8.5 ce28's weigh in at a huge 13.7 lbs.......
You showed me. Now if you don't mind, I'm going to go steal your CE28Ns.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #12  
gr8rx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Smile

Originally Posted by LionZoo
You showed me. Now if you don't mind, I'm going to go steal your CE28Ns.

good luck
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #13  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
My CE28Ns weigh 6.5 lbs ... of course they're 14" on my 1993 Miata!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 12:13 AM
  #14  
gr8rx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
and you have me beat.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 03:53 AM
  #15  
tiltmode43's Avatar
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
17's you ask? Cheaper tires, lighter weight, shorter gears w/right tires

If you're going with 17's staticlag make sure you have some sort of drop. The oe ride height looks a bit high with 17" rims

edit: Besides r compound tires, if you'll be putting the rims to race applications where you wish to run v710's count the 17's out, the diameter is actually larger than 18's

Last edited by tiltmode43; Dec 26, 2006 at 04:10 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yurcivicsux
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
192
Sep 12, 2017 10:54 PM
RAVSPEC
Vendor Classifieds
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:59 PM
AussieGray
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
Jul 16, 2015 03:58 AM
rotarenvy
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
4
Jul 13, 2004 04:26 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.