Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Kumho Ecstas

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #1  
VRRocket's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Jamestown, NC
Kumho Ecstas

Just had some 225/40/18's installed on Friday and I wanted to pass along my findings after a long weekend trip:

Driving home I tried a couple of moves I might have tried in my OEM Bridgestones on an on ramp at speed and a 90 degree turn into my neighborhood at speed. Got a lot of squealing and much less turn-in than with the Bridgestones. The sidewall, though smaller than stock, appears to be much less rigid and prone to rollover.

The interstate drive itself was great. The tires are very quiet, have good manners in the rain, and have a very smooth ride. If you're not driving it at 8/10, I couldn't be happier given the price.

Bottom line - I'm disappointed with the handling I gave up, but with a 420 tread rating, I expect to get much more than the 19,400 miles out of the Bridgestones. The lower profiles give it a more aggressive look, the tread looks aggressive, and the tires appear noticeably wider giving it (yes, once again) an aggressive look. Seems to be more form over function with the looks, but unless you're driving like a maniac you'll be pretty happy. Straight line performance (in the rain, too) appears to be at least equal to the Potenzas. As a replacement tire, I'd give it an 8 of 10, and I likely won't be back at Discount tire at 38K either.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
VRRocket's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Jamestown, NC
Correction - 245/40/18's - sorry.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 02:56 AM
  #3  
sleeepyhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CA
next time try the kuhmo mx, a very grippy tire that has a 220 treadwear rating only....but its VERY grippy
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 08:42 AM
  #4  
dankgummy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Arlington VA
The sidewall, though smaller than stock, appears to be much less rigid and prone to rollover.
How is the sidewall smaller from the stock wheels as they're both 40? me no intende...
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #5  
JO8's Avatar
JO8
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
stock = 45
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
dankgummy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Arlington VA
d'oh
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brandonien
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
Jul 30, 2015 12:33 PM
tiggerlee
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
65
Apr 28, 2006 12:56 PM
rob.rotor
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
0
Apr 5, 2006 06:16 PM
dasaints1967
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
6
Feb 22, 2006 10:51 AM
connor@tirerack
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
5
Jul 12, 2005 02:24 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.