Notices
RX-8 Multimedia/Photo Gallery Share your pics,videos or links to them.

SR Motorsports Hi Flow Cat Video

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
foxman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Torque is Good
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
SR Motorsports Hi Flow Cat Video

Definitely louder...and I think lower...

http://indy-rx.com/videos/srcatvid.wmv
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
truemagellen's Avatar
Attracts tree branches
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 3
woah you should put a warning up for that part when you do the drive by, I'm deaf now
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:00 AM
  #3  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
interesting clip. What exhaust did you say you had? For some reason my borla sounds a lot deeper than yours, but maybe it's the video camera.

http://tyrannical.org/rx8/borla_6k.wmv

I've been thinking about a midpipe myself.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:04 AM
  #4  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
i think thats stock exhaust... just very clean

doesn't sound a lot deeper, maybe the vid doesn't do it justice. Sounds like a bunch of bees buzzing...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:09 AM
  #5  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
oh, man. If that is the stock exhaust, i'm not going to do a midpipe. The stock exhaust is super quiet, and his setup in the video was definately anything but.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:16 AM
  #6  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
was it that loud? didn't seem so...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #7  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
i think his camera doesn't pick up the sound very well. the stock exhaust is very quiet, so with the amount of noise coming from his car in this video, i can only assume an aftermarket exhaust would be way too loud with the midpipe/high flow cat.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:37 AM
  #8  
truemagellen's Avatar
Attracts tree branches
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 3
hamilton you have the navigation system? question is, is that Borla video yours? sounds great! I love how the exhaust pipe condenses with moisture inbetween revvings
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:40 AM
  #9  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by truemagellen
hamilton you have the navigation system? question is, is that Borla video yours? sounds great! I love how the exhaust pipe condenses with moisture inbetween revvings
Yeah, far as I know I have the navigation, unless my damn dealer lied to me and drew a picture of a navigation unit on my dash.

anything hosted on tyrannical.org is mine
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:57 AM
  #10  
foxman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Torque is Good
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
It was my first attempt at digital video and yeah the rest of exhaust is stock. AVI, MPEG and WMV files seem to produce different sound and there are quite a few quality settings for sound and video, the camera is mono, so limiting. I will say it sounds fairly different in the flesh. I am still working to try and recreate something that seems realistic.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 08:00 AM
  #11  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
I like Sony's HC digital video camera line. I think I paid around $350 for the one i have now (HC20). The sound is pretty accurate with it, and the video is decent. Sony has this "usb streaming" crap, but it garbles the video and sound due to the lack of bandwidth. With the firewire cable, you can get full quality digital captures without any fuss. I also had a Sony TRV unit (slightly larger body size than the HC20, but basically the same video and sound quality) which costs $200-250 (I'm going by memory, so not an exact number, but pretty close to that range)

I used to have an older video camera that cost around $700, but trying to get the output digital would be more hassle than it's worth given how cheap the new digital ones are.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #12  
rx8wannahave's Avatar
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
I don't like the sound...I'm happy your happy, but I don't like how it sounds too much.

I like the Borla & mmmm...dang it I forgot the other name?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 09:38 AM
  #13  
foxman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Torque is Good
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
I am shopping for cat backs because I want it to be lower.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #14  
Ned M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Sound bytes aside, what performance difference do you see with the high flow cat and stock (?) cat back, and thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 10:01 AM
  #15  
foxman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Torque is Good
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
SR Motorsports claims 10 HP or something like that and I think you need a less restrictive cat back to take full advantage of it which is why I want to get that plus I can probably shave a total of 30lbs off the weight with the right setup. The main thing I noticed is it seems to pull better in 4th gear from around 3K-4K rpm or so. There is no resonator and the cat is very small compared to stock and weighs some 15 lbs less.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
galognu
Rotary Swaps
138
Nov 16, 2020 05:20 AM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
May 23, 2019 05:46 PM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:48 PM
tommy26Germany
Series I Trouble Shooting
11
Sep 29, 2015 10:33 AM
FubarI33t
New Member Forum
12
Sep 28, 2015 08:45 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.