Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

ContiSportContact 3 - 8lbs lighter than stock!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #1  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
ContiSportContact 3 - 8lbs lighter than stock!

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...e1=yes&place=4

must be a brand new tire, since Continentals own website doesn't have the specs yet, if these tirerack specs are correct, that is a pretty amazing weight savings over the stock tires.

I just happen to be perusing the tirerack when I stumbled across these.

I can't make any comments as to the performance, but I liked my Continentals on the Mazda6 I had.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #2  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Holy crap, and I thought the 23 pounds that 245/40-18 Advan Sports weigh were light. The SportContact 3s even in the 245 fitment is only 21 pounds. A tire's weight is not it's most important characteristic, but if reviews of this tire are good I might need to ditch my preference for Yokohamas.

Last edited by LionZoo; Dec 8, 2006 at 01:36 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:39 AM
  #3  
CAM427R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
That is a pretty large difference in weight. Pretty amazing, I'd like to see what those can do.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:50 AM
  #4  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Maybe it's a misprint.

Anyhow I wonder if the sidewalls hold up.

some people are complaing about other high performance tires

Last edited by Razz1; Dec 8, 2006 at 11:12 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 01:10 AM
  #5  
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 3
From: caddyshack
that's significant unsprung weight reduction, should be noticeable handling improvement
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 03:45 AM
  #6  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
dude.

you gave me wood.. but the 245 40 18 weighs 28 lbs...

i got to go with missprint vana..


please, please, please prove me wrong.. bitch..

beers
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:26 AM
  #7  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
My current Pirelli's are 21lbs in a 225/45/18, so I think it is possible, but I'm going to contact Continental today and ask.

With these tires, you really almost don't need light weight wheels, unless you just like the look I guess. I happen to like the stock wheel design, hence my search for the lightest good tires possible.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 09:49 AM
  #8  
dgrx8's Avatar
FN GR8
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 1
From: Miami
holy crap!
subscribes...
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #9  
Umbra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
I hope the improved the tire. The conti's I had were total pieces of crap. Wore really fast and traction was never that great.

Those stock tires on the 8 though are really heavy, just about anything is lighter.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #10  
KimiFelipe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
This is going to be a great tire from what I've read. The contisportcontact 2 is also excellent, while the original contisport contact did indeed suck.

You have to expect a high rate of wear for a top summer tire, Umbra. At best getting a better wearing summer is going to give you 5 k mi or so, but the performance difference will be significant, afaik.

Personally, my favorite tires are the B'stone RE 050, the CSC 2, the Avon Tech M500 (for a cheap alternative), the TOYO T1-R, and the Dunlop 8090 (although for the price this one is just not worth it at all). I want to like the Pilot sport and SO3 pp, but these are too loud.

I can't wait until my 040's wear out - this is loud tire too. OTOH, it's hard to fault otherwise, the grip is excellent, although not as good as the 050.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:37 PM
  #11  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by swoope
dude.

you gave me wood.. but the 245 40 18 weighs 28 lbs...

i got to go with missprint vana..


please, please, please prove me wrong.. bitch..

beers
That's the runflat version. The normal "Mercedes" fitment is 21 pounds.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
The car comes with run flat!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 01:55 AM
  #13  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by LionZoo
That's the runflat version. The normal "Mercedes" fitment is 21 pounds.
yep,

i chatted with brillo about that today.. i hope this i right... as i am in the market for new tires..

beers
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #14  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by LionZoo
That's the runflat version. The normal "Mercedes" fitment is 21 pounds.
yep,

have looked again, but wtf is mercedes and what wtf does it have to do with tire size...

214 bucks .. thinks

beers

Last edited by swoope; Dec 9, 2006 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #15  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Mercedes means it's an OEM fitment for some Mercedes model or other. It might be a normal tire that they wanted to identify as a Mercedes OEM fitment, or it could have differences in construction and/or compound that Mercedes requested.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #16  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
making your choice on weight alone is a big mistake
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #17  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
making your choice on weight alone is a big mistake
Very much so. But if two tires are comparable, then the lighter tire wins. Weight is definitely not the deciding factor.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #18  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
I'm getting some wierd info on this tire per continentals email from a customer service rep. She said the 225/45/18 was 22.xxlb and the 245/40/18 was 11.xxlbs, obiously wrong.

I called Continental but wasn't able to get any better info. We will have to wait for the tires to hit our shores to know for sure. I'll check back in about a month.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #19  
Spin9k's Avatar
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by brillo
must be a brand new tire, since Continentals own website doesn't have the specs yet, if these tirerack specs are correct, that is a pretty amazing weight savings over the stock tires.
Found these new Continentials here but no specs as you say http://www.conti-online.com/generato...master_en.html

Really cool animated tire movies here http://www.conti-online.com/coremedi...main01_en.html .... use the streaming flash version .... cool for a tire site

Could be something to them if they are so light!!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #20  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
I trust tirerack's numbers as they weigh it themselves, rather than use the manufacturer's numbers.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #21  
Umbra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
You have to expect a high rate of wear for a top summer tire, Umbra. At best getting a better wearing summer is going to give you 5 k mi or so, but the performance difference will be significant, afaik.
I realize the wear issue, but when you can chirp the tires going into 5th gear they suck.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #22  
KimiFelipe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Umbra
I realize the wear issue, but when you can chirp the tires going into 5th gear they suck.
What (not completely worn out) tire have you done this with in an RX-8? I don't believe you, unless you were running a summer tire when its really cold or on ice.

The RX-8 doesn't have that kind of power.

Even completely worn, almost any tire will have good dry traction when its hot out, because of the very high contact patch.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #23  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
^^^^

no way,

i doubt a fi motor could do that... or were you driving in snow?

beers
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #24  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
Originally Posted by KimiFelipe
Even completely worn, almost any tire will have good dry traction when its hot out, because of the very high contact patch.
anybody that races can tell you that your comment above is BS
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 11:50 PM
  #25  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Slippery slide on my bald tires with high contact patch. It's hot out!
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.