RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   Series I Tech Garage (https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/)
-   -   lets discuss air filters (https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/lets-discuss-air-filters-189352/)

olddragger 01-14-2010 08:51 AM

lets discuss air filters
 
Maybe its time to discuss this issue?
1st I dont think there is any need to panic about anything but there is more to an air filter than some may think? So in breaking it down (and please add anything I may have left out!)

1- right size is needed---how do you determine the size of a/f you need in reference to the modifications you have done? Is it obvious that a FI engine would need a larger a/f than a na engine? Is the oem size in reference to sq inch filtering ok for a fi engine or does the oem size restrict the air flow that is really needed? How is this determined?
I had a little discussion on this in the Pettit thread some time ago--but i have since lost it and fogotton some formulas we were using. If i recall correctly the oem size was not big enough for 300+ hp engines?

2- true cold air intake--- not as simple as it sounds. Placement is key. IMHO this cannot be done with the af inside the engine bay. Even racing beats setup with the airscoop does not cool the incoming air like an air filter placed out side the engine bay. It is also very susceptable to heat soak. It is better than oem
10f of increased air temp=1 hp is the standard rule I believe
Heat shields inside the engine bay do not work nearly as well--- period.
So the oem/mazdaspeed style is better or the long straight homemade "rams" that run outside the ngine bay or ok---right? Well MAYBE. because of the following #3

3- filtering ability------ something that hasnt been talked about much. But this is raising its ugly head lately. Race teams have lost engines due to sand being sucked in through the AF when the AF is placed outside the engine bay. The AF used by the teams was the K&N, which was properly oiled etc. Two engines lost iby one team in one w/e and sand was actually found in the oil pan. This info caused me to take another look at mine. When I did I could actually see little holes visable through the filter medium with the naked bifocaled eye. As I held it up to the sun and looked inside out many little holes were clearly shining! THAT AINT GOOD. Yes it was oiled.
Further research ,I discovered many sources saying do not use just the k& n by itself--- it is wise to also use a wet foam wrap around it to catch the small stuff (this includes exhaust soot etc) or use a paper type throw-a-way.
used engine oil analysis recently being done also reveals findings that can indicate poor air filtration. IMHO this is not an issue to ignore if you want your engine to last a long time.
I guess the day of just slapping a performance air filter on the engine is over.


So whats the best? Again imho the aem/mazdaspeed (both have paper type filters) units or a k& n outside the engine bay with a wet foam wrap seems to be the best way to go if you want a good true cai that filters well. Just dont forget to use the appropiate size----and what would that be?
thoughts and opinions?
OD

RIWWP 01-14-2010 09:01 AM

Subscribed. I don't know that I can add anything of value, but sure am interested.

bse50 01-14-2010 09:04 AM

A true CAI is probably the best solution, performance wise. I was researching your same formulae lately but didn't find much.

With the Revi intake from racing beat intake temps tend to be higher than ambient temp and i'm afraid that its insulation doesn't match the oem airbox one. In fact, i just received a mail from an italian guy that reported a pretty constant intake temp of 14°C with an ambient temp of 4°C. This is not a big issue but i told him to buy some house radiator's insulation foils and he replied after a couple of days stating that his intake temps with the same ambient temperatures as before were 4-6°C lower.

Now i wonder if anybody else tried something similar, in that case we could consider that kind of airbox again as an alternative to a CAI.

mscamp02 01-14-2010 09:05 AM

subscribed as well with the same reasons as RIWWP

9krpmrx8 01-14-2010 09:46 AM

Great topic OD, I have some info here in my thread as well. After reading and researching a bit I got rid of my K&N and went with a WIX filter. I believe Eric Meyer also posted up some info about sand in the oil pan on some dustier tracks when using the K&N and confirmed that a lot of teams use the OEM paper filter. I believe this combined with poor OCI and not getting all of the oil out has a huge effect on the engine. It seems logical to me but what do I know.

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...ght=air+filter


Here is a test that I read.

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm

Nubo 01-14-2010 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by olddragger (Post 3387496)
...Two engines lost iby one team in one w/e and sand was actually found in the oil pan. This info caused me to take another look at mine. When I did I could actually see little holes visable through the filter medium with the naked bifocaled eye. As I held it up to the sun and looked inside out many little holes were clearly shining! THAT AINT GOOD. Yes it was oiled.

That same experience turned me off of K&N some years back. Maybe a filtration expert can tell me I'm wrong, but it just doesn't seem good when you can see daylight through the filter! Not worth it for such a small power increase (if any).

StealthTL 01-14-2010 11:21 AM

You have to worry about an air filter company that claims their filter efficiency actually improves when it starts to clog up with dust.

I prefer a filter that doesn't use oily dirt as the filtering medium.....

Nubo 01-14-2010 11:28 AM


Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8 (Post 3387555)

Unfortunately, that test doesn't tell us much, other than all filters allow some dirt to pass. What's really needed to form an opinion is the particle size distribution. There will always be some minimum particulate size that will be passed. For an engine, this should be small enough to not compromise the oil film. Likely, the bulk of the visible dirt in each test was made up of these very fine particles.

As particle size increases past the ability of the oil film to carry them the likelihood of engine wear and damage increases. Even a small amount of these particles are much more important than the amount of "allowable" particulate size.

9krpmrx8 01-14-2010 11:34 AM

Yeah, I don't think the damn near unnoticeable HP gain is worth it. And honestly going back to the WIX I saw no difference in my Butt dyno and the WIX appears to test well from what I have read.

9krpmrx8 01-14-2010 11:36 AM


Originally Posted by Nubo (Post 3387646)
Unfortunately, that test doesn't tell us much, other than all filters allow some dirt to pass. What's really needed to form an opinion is the particle size distribution. There will always be some minimum particulate size that will be passed. For an engine, this should be small enough to not compromise the oil film. Likely, the bulk of the visible dirt in each test was made up of these very fine particles.

As particle size increases past the ability of the oil film to carry them the likelihood of engine wear and damage increases. Even a small amount of these particles are much more important than the amount of "allowable" particulate size.


Good point.

olddragger 01-14-2010 12:13 PM

unfortunitly auto air fliters are not classified to the particulant size filtering ability. unbelieveable and polictical.
I am buying the aem today. I just figured out that my 40lbs/min of needed air flow will be covered by the "standard" rx8 aem filter. It flows over the 526cfm of flow i need. I am going to do a straight "ram" type with the filter outside the bay.
I bet a lot of people dont realize the importance of the air filter.
OD

9krpmrx8 01-14-2010 01:21 PM

Cone filter?

olddragger 01-14-2010 03:07 PM

it is --almost like the one that comes with the rx8 aem intake.
I almost dont want to change it as i would like my next uoa to have all the same controls as my 1st.
OD

TeamRX8 01-14-2010 05:07 PM

This is the filter I'll be using, note that the 3.5" inlet size is rated @ 450 BHP, it weighs maybe 3 or 4 ounces

http://www.itgairfilters.com/airfilt...ection=maxogen

you'll have to wait for pics later on the rest of it

Mawnee 01-14-2010 05:24 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Mine is about as Cold air as you can get :evil_laug

TeamRX8 01-14-2010 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by Mawnee (Post 3388254)
Mine is about as Cold air as you can get :evil_laug


Are you sure that one side isn't sucking hot air from the intercooler :dunno:

Mawnee 01-14-2010 11:30 PM


Originally Posted by TeamRX8 (Post 3388481)
Are you sure that one side isn't sucking hot air from the intercooler :dunno:

Only when I"m driving backwards. Its not up against it.

olddragger 01-15-2010 08:32 AM

where are yall finding the 90% pipe that goes behind the front bumper support? I have a silicone elbow but it has to compress to get through that space and I dont want that. Are yall using 3.5 "?

I couldnt install the aem filter outside the bay. Not enough room for the size of filter I need.
So I just placed it up agaisnt the "opening" as much as i could. its actually touching it.
measured temps between the bottom of the filter and the airbox tray on the way to work this morning and it was only 3degrees greater than ambient. It does heat soak some when you are not moving but it cools off fairly quickly once you start to move again. Not as good as the hang down type of mazda speed etc but ok for now.
dadgum a/f's now have a smoother transistion than I had with the k&N. I will never use those again.
Team --that is a interesting filter you have there--in just looking/reading its the best foam type I have seen. Do you DD the car with it?
OD

olddragger 01-15-2010 08:33 AM

by the way how many lbs of air/min are some of the turbo guys requiring, and what are they running?

Mawnee 01-15-2010 10:21 AM


Originally Posted by olddragger (Post 3388893)
where are yall finding the 90% pipe that goes behind the front bumper support? I have a silicone elbow but it has to compress to get through that space and I dont want that. Are yall using 3.5 "?


My filter is a 3" inlet. The silicon elbow that turns down there is a 3.5" to 3" reducing elbow :)

I did 3" filter > 3" tube> 3" to 3.5" 90 elbow > 8" of 3.5" tube > screen > MAF > 6" of 3.5" tube > 3.5" to 3" 90 degree elbow > 3" pipe with vacuum and BOV recirc > Turbo inlet

TeamRX8 01-15-2010 01:52 PM

3" filter and piping? http://www.uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/im...s/facepalm.gif

OD, this filter is new for me, but the car won't be a DD. It is large and not easy to package in some situations. This will be a V2revision of my previous home depot NA intake, with a little more thought and polish but unfortunately slightly heavier than the original V1 concept which used a smaller K&N cone. The OD of the outer bell inlet base is approx. 7.125". The interior is interest, neither solid nor completely open, but more like a large honeycomb support pattern. The outer foam surface does all the filtering. It starts out course and progressively tightens up to very fine. I still can't believe how light it is, it weighs almost nothing.



.

always.anthony 01-15-2010 02:05 PM

pics when you are done olddragger.

i think i might be doing what you are trying to do!

olddragger 01-15-2010 03:32 PM

sounds sweet Team--i know you are keeping the inside of the intake tubing smooth and clean.
Are you funneling the piping?

Mawee-- i dont like pinching that 90% silicone elbow----i am actually thinking of whittling some off the front bumper support so i can get a better path. Whats that thing for anyway--low speed damage?

OR--maybe a lavaris air intake directly in front of where i have it now. decisions, decisions.

Has anyone thought about having a "trumphet style" pipe to the maf pipe?

kersh4w 01-15-2010 03:36 PM

the foam thing does nothing. the bumper is a 5mph impact bumper.

IIRC.

i've seen a few people do this (carbonrx8 i've seen personally). they knock the middle area out (with a sledgehammer) or you can cut yours out whatever. and then some people just leave the two towers. or some people weld a bar of good strength steel between the 2 towers. so its much smaller and just as strong, if not stronger, then the original.

Mawnee 01-15-2010 03:51 PM


Originally Posted by TeamRX8 (Post 3389301)

The inlet on my turbo is 3".......I only expanded to 3.5" for the sake of the MAF.

Greddy kit guys go down to 2" piping.....

I ran a 3.5" filter for my 650rwhp vette, how much RWHP are you running with your Rx8 to make you think a 3.5" is so crucial?

olddragger 01-15-2010 03:53 PM

good info and opens up a new way of doing things.
It is a good heatsink and hanger for a secondary radiator :)
OD

mike[piston eater] 01-15-2010 04:00 PM

im gonna chime in one problem with oiled filters like k&n is the oil is what traps the particles, and the filtering isnt as efficient, acoording to my automotive teacher afilter such as k&n could cause a term called "dusting" or basically little particles not being stopped by the filter and scratching the cylinder wall and losing compression, i have no clue what it would do to a rotary, but just some cool knowlege i thought id pass along

AJ's Shinka 01-15-2010 04:52 PM

So what your sayin iz... my K&N is holy?

mike[piston eater] 01-15-2010 04:54 PM

lol well they let more microns through than desired if not properly oiled, they do have better airflow, just throwing out info

AJ's Shinka 01-15-2010 05:06 PM

Got it, must buy more oil.

mike[piston eater] 01-15-2010 05:12 PM

and just a word of advice for people who live in extremly dusty places like desserts and such, but then there is a thing as too much oil lol

always.anthony 01-15-2010 05:42 PM

why have it bend and go lower?

best imo would exit engine bay and stop right there. no need to curve down get closer to ground and pick up more dirt/dust if thats the issue. straight path good flow too.

TeamRX8 01-15-2010 06:02 PM


Originally Posted by Mawnee (Post 3389506)
The inlet on my turbo is 3".......I only expanded to 3.5" for the sake of the MAF.

Greddy kit guys go down to 2" piping.....

I ran a 3.5" filter for my 650rwhp vette, how much RWHP are you running with your Rx8 to make you think a 3.5" is so crucial?


It's not just diameter but also length. Ideally you minimize any and all flow restrictions. If possible I'd mount this on the inlet

http://www.vibrantperformance.com/pressrelease23.php

and with it's 6" OD for your 3" inlet would want to maintain that as far as possible. Our 3.5" MAF housing requires it to neck down at some point, but I'd still want to maintain that size or larger ahead of it.

And yes, I have one of those mounted at the throttle body of my NA. The length/spacing didn't pan out like I wanted so it could change once data can be generated with it. It will be different than anything ever seen on an RX-8 for sure. Unfortunately a rules clarification prevents me from removing the plastic cover under the VFAD that blocks the opening behind the crash bumper support.

You guys without rules can cut a curved notch on the backside of that support to allow a large diameter tube to pass through and then weld in a rolled piece and other reinforcement so it still provides head-on protection. Or if you're willing to risk it remove it entirely.

Mawnee 01-15-2010 06:41 PM


Originally Posted by always.anthony (Post 3389766)
why have it bend and go lower?

best imo would exit engine bay and stop right there. no need to curve down get closer to ground and pick up more dirt/dust if thats the issue. straight path good flow too.

The filter was too big to fit like that. That was my initial intent :) Thats why I have it on a bend too..it has to be angled out from under the beam then away from the intercooler. This is for V1 of my turbo kit. If my new BOV ever shows up I think I'm going to have a go at blow through maf and redo all that piping :)

jskup1 01-16-2010 06:25 AM

OD, are you still using Pettit's MAF pipe? Which AEM filter did you get?

olddragger 01-16-2010 01:01 PM

yea--didnt change the maf pipe--just added a silicone connector to it and a short piece of 3.5 aluminum pipe. then a reducer to the aem filter as the filter inlet was only 3". This doesnt hurt anything. Its a round type and about 6" long. End result it butts right up against the oem hole.
Now i have enlarged that hole a long time ago. I also have a custom made the front support bar cover that helps to get air to that position. I also cut the front bumper at the mazda embelm position leaving no material behind it. That didnt help as much as i had wished.
So far this is working for me---moving the filter just a little closer to the opening made a significant difference. I also made sure the space between the oem air box bottom plate and the radiator was sealed and i did insulate that plate from radiator heat.
SO on a 58F day the bottom part of my filter was running 61-62F on the road. Stopped at a redlight etc and it does heat soak pretty fast but recovers quickly also.
i am more limited than some others as i cant find a big enough air filter (i need at least 40lbs per minute of flow) to fit between the front bar and the front clip and i have the a/w coolers and a secondary radiator hanging down in the area that the mazdaspeed and aem intakes go.
SO---this summer i hope this set up stays like this--if it doesnt maybe i will do the vesio(?) air scoop.
besides i really dont like all the bends in the aem etc intake design.
Guys sounds like some are mixing difference sizes of pipe in their intakes---thats not the best way right? If you have too isnt it best to do it on one end or the other--not in the middle?
OD

always.anthony 01-16-2010 05:04 PM

depends, theres a lot of physics that goes into that.

of course pressure and velocity will multiply the affect.

olddragger 01-16-2010 07:14 PM

physics will help delay my alzheimers ....dizzy:)
OD


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands