Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

How do we improve the mileage on our cars? A brainstorming session

Old 03-02-2007, 06:32 PM
  #1  
RX-VIII
Thread Starter
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb How do we improve the mileage on our cars? A brainstorming session

How do we improve the mileage on our cars?

First off, what we have is an engine that has great power to weight, but poor fuel efficiency to power. That’s what we have, so we can’t do a whole lot about it. But, it got me to thinking, what can we do otherwise to help out at the gas pump (and, even more important for me, increase the range!).

What makes a car more fuel efficient? Better efficiency…in all aspects.

So, as I see it, there are a number of things that can be done.

Improve aerodynamics
What potential aerodynamic fixes would improve highway gas mileage? Would a flat bottom help? What would it take to do this? Plastic? Aluminum? What could be potential problems? Heat? How about the front end? Any improvements in managing the air?

Improve drivetrain efficiency
Given our RWD setup, what can be done? Would new fluids in the transmission help? And in the diff? Would there be worries about a lighter fluid contributing to increased wear? The engine already takes pretty light oil, so I don’t think there is much there. How about parasitic losses on the engine? We’ve got an electric pump for the power steering, but what about the alternator and air conditioner? Are there more efficient units out there?

Lose weight
In stop and go traffic, having to move and stop and move and stop 3000 pounds hurts the mileage. Trimming weight helps, but Mazda already has done a pretty good job at minimizing weight. However, we can still get lighter wheels, lighter tires, and a lighter flywheel. Speaking of wheels/tires, would a narrower tire help with aerodynamics? I’m not sure if I’m willing to give up on grip, but I’m just brainstorming here.

Change drivetrain gear ratios
I think having a taller 6th would help out. In my normal, sea level driving, there’s more power than I need in 6th. I’d rather it be a super tall mileage gear (like in a Corvette or Viper). I can always shift when I need to pass or hit a steep hill. Actually, combine the taller 6th gear with a little bit shorter differential ratio, and we’d have better acceleration and better fuel mileage.

Other?
Anyone else have ideas? Since Racing Beat really wasn’t able to get better fuel efficiency after cracking the computer, managing the air:fuel ratio apparently isn’t the answer.

Wild dreams?
What does a rotary do very well? Produce heat! Combine the heat of the rotary with the steam powered BMW turbo system and you’d be able to see pretty good gains in power and efficiency. Wouldn’t that be nice? Or add an electric motor flywheel like Honda has (though the weight penalty for the battery pack would be a bummer). Or…what?

Links
BMW turbosteamer
Weight of stock RX-8 parts

~ Matt
Old 03-02-2007, 06:48 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
HeavyMetal699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem is that no matter what you do you will end up spending more money in trying to maximize gas mileage than what you would spend in just paying for gas.
Old 03-02-2007, 06:52 PM
  #3  
RX-VIII
Thread Starter
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HeavyMetal699
The problem is that no matter what you do you will end up spending more money in trying to maximize gas mileage than what you would spend in just paying for gas.
Well, this isn't really about money. It's more about what solutions can be found, and where the future of rotary engines can go.

Also, the range of the car (meaning frequent fill ups) is aggravating to me. I'm not sure what price I'd put on that.
Old 03-02-2007, 07:19 PM
  #4  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a larger gas tank would be nice, it won't improve mileage plus it'll add weight, but will increase the length of your drive.
Old 03-02-2007, 07:23 PM
  #5  
I dont care...
 
otherside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pleasantville
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a sail to take advantage of the prevailing winds?
Old 03-02-2007, 08:15 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
flomulgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^

Seriously though, the Turbosteamer concept is awesome! Designing aerodynamic fins for the reverse radiator would be pretty important though to prevent backpressure.

Pretty much everything you've said so far is true and will help, but costs a lot. I'm not sure there is anything so cheap that it pays for itself. Making more power-take off stuff like AC more efficient or electric is intriguing.....
Old 03-02-2007, 09:00 PM
  #7  
6 spd Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
ucleadguitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stop shifting at 9k...but its too much fun to stop!
Old 03-02-2007, 09:58 PM
  #8  
Extraordinary Engineering
 
DarkBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burls On
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
This one always works.

Between fill ups put in $10.00 worth of gas but don't count it when you fill up. The mileage improves dramatically and it doesn't cost as much as many mods


Okay that was silly.


This one really works.

Just make sure that all your trips are long and that you don't sit in traffic. This mod costs nothing and improve driving enjoyment.



Okay, not very practical.



These will work...

Get a ride with someone else.
Buy a fuel efficient car.
Move closer to work.
Old 03-02-2007, 09:59 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pay for your gas by swiping a credit card and do not look at the pump. Have your wife do the bills so you don't have to look at the statement too. Does wonders for your worries
Old 03-03-2007, 04:43 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
spooledUP7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dillsrotary
a larger gas tank would be nice, it won't improve mileage plus it'll add weight, but will increase the length of your drive.
This is the best solution for your primary concern, range.
Old 03-03-2007, 05:10 PM
  #11  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
I could stand to lose 20 pounds and get back down to my fighting weight. I'm sure that would help!

I got 19mpg on a 278 mile round trip last weekend (I thought I was riding on fumes when I got home to the gas station right up the road but the car only took 14.5 gallons on fill-up so there was still over a gallon left in the tank). It really sucks when I used to be able to do the same trip in my Maxima in 1/2 a tank.

I try to limit the amount fo weight I carry but to be honest I noticed that last weekend when I made the trip (just me and my 90lb son and one small duffle bag) I got almost the same exact mileage as when the whole family goes (120lb wife and 40lb daughter plus shitload of clothes that comes with them). So you would have to lose a crap load of weight to make a difference. I also just got wider tires and it did not seem to hurt my mileage a bit. I did cruise at about 85-90 the whole way so I am sure cruising at 70 would probably have gotten me better mileage but I am too impatient.

I wonder how much difference smoothing out the bottom would help for the lower cars. I will be swapping tranny and diff fluids at the next meet so the next time I go up to my pops house I will see if that makes a difference in mileage. I have also just upped my tire PSI to 34 so maybe the combination of things will increase it a bit.
Old 03-04-2007, 02:14 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
SOVINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ucleadguitar
stop shifting at 9k...but its too much fun to stop!
Simple solutions. Sad but true.
Old 03-04-2007, 02:32 AM
  #13  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,521
Received 1,489 Likes on 839 Posts
a piggyback retune will actually give you better mpg if you regularly 'drive it like you stole it'. Does nothing for cruising so i don't cruise a lot
Old 03-05-2007, 01:53 PM
  #14  
RX-VIII
Thread Starter
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I wonder how much difference smoothing out the bottom would help for the lower cars. I will be swapping tranny and diff fluids at the next meet so the next time I go up to my pops house I will see if that makes a difference in mileage. I have also just upped my tire PSI to 34 so maybe the combination of things will increase it a bit.
I've always been curious about managing the air under a car and how much it could help. Ferrari does it, so there must be a performance advantage. Is it so that they car run a diffuser, gain downforce, and not have a spoiler or do they do it to reduce drag to improve top speed? I'd like to think it is for both.

Oh, and yes, I know to improve my mileage/range, I could buy a different car, or drive it like an old lady, but really, I think this goes beyond the current RX-8. If you had a clean sheet design opportunity for a car with the Renesis engine, how could you make it reasonably fuel efficient? Given where the cost of gas is and the mood of the world, it's going to have to be somewhat efficient to sell. If we could actually to 18/24 city/freeway regularly, I'd be happy. What can be done to the rest of the car to get there?
Old 03-05-2007, 03:24 PM
  #15  
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey City NJ
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been wanting to see someone take the first-gen rx7 and stick a renesis in there. That body was wicked light...
Old 03-05-2007, 04:56 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
New Yorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,319
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
If Mazda's engineers couldn't get better mileage (and that's knowing critics would be waiting, armed and loaded, to attack the new RX car's fuel economy), I have this crazy feeling we're not about to figure it out here.

Old 03-05-2007, 06:36 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
limpy81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I try to limit the amount fo weight I carry but to be honest I noticed that last weekend when I made the trip (just me and my 90lb son and one small duffle bag) I got almost the same exact mileage as when the whole family goes (120lb wife and 40lb daughter plus shitload of clothes that comes with them). So you would have to lose a crap load of weight to make a difference. I also just got wider tires and it did not seem to hurt my mileage a bit. I did cruise at about 85-90 the whole way so I am sure cruising at 70 would probably have gotten me better mileage but I am too impatient.
I thought that more weight actually helped gas mileage on the freeway (or whenever you're maintaining constant speed) because the increased momentum helps to carry the car. Not sure if this is correct.
Old 03-05-2007, 09:01 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Reprogram the fuel system to deliver a leaner mixture. AKA better fuel map.
Old 03-06-2007, 01:41 AM
  #19  
SymSym
 
SymSym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leaner mixture equals burnt out cat. I have never had a problem with fuel economy. I get 28mpg on cruise and 23mpg around town. Always warm up the car, and drive teh car wtih the traffic flow. Don't always rev to 9k but usually 4-5k between shifts. Get into 6th gear as soon as possible.
Old 03-06-2007, 12:26 PM
  #20  
RX-VIII
Thread Starter
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SymSym
Leaner mixture equals burnt out cat. I have never had a problem with fuel economy. I get 28mpg on cruise and 23mpg around town. Always warm up the car, and drive teh car wtih the traffic flow. Don't always rev to 9k but usually 4-5k between shifts. Get into 6th gear as soon as possible.
This always surprises me. Most all of us get mileage in the high teens, but there are a few people out there that get significantly better mileage. What's your cruising speed? I've done pretty much entire tanks of gas on cruise control on the freeways and I'm lucky to break 20 mpg. I usually set the cruise at 74 to 76 mph.


Originally Posted by Raptor75
Reprogram the fuel system to deliver a leaner mixture. AKA better fuel map.
Racing Beat has tried and they haven't had much luck. Check out this link.

Fuel Economy

We made a serious effort to look for any increase in mileage we could possibly find - but to no avail. Since mileage is the result of operation in oxygen feedback, all we had to do was change the target oxygen lambda numbers in the PCM maps and we were able to uniformly lean the mixture any time the engine was in feedback. We tried approximately 1 1/2% lean of the standard maps. As a result, we got about 1/2% improvement in the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC - a way of measuring the efficiency of turning fuel into power) and with it some slightly rough operation. After further testing, we confirmed that for the engine as it is now configured, Mazda has already cut the mixture to maximum efficiency - it is so close to ideal there was nothing significant we could do the improve it. This was discouraging to discover, but common sense says Mazda tried very hard to optimize fuel mileage - and our findings confirmed this.
Old 03-06-2007, 03:34 PM
  #21  
Anatomy of a corner...
 
fullsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 536
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Vaillant
This always surprises me. Most all of us get mileage in the high teens, but there are a few people out there that get significantly better mileage. What's your cruising speed? I've done pretty much entire tanks of gas on cruise control on the freeways and I'm lucky to break 20 mpg. I usually set the cruise at 74 to 76 mph.
I recently moved to CA from Georgia and have noticed a 1-2 point drop in mpg. I've tried to bring up my mpg, back to ~20, but to no avail. I have a feeling it's the hills here in CA. So, I believe CA should repave all their roads to be the same elevation.

Just kidding.

FS
Old 03-06-2007, 03:40 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get about 18-21 here in Middle Tennesse. Plenty of hills here to. I'm afraid it the gas in CA. Does all the Gas in CA have ethanol? All cars get worse gas mileage with that stuff.
Old 03-06-2007, 03:57 PM
  #23  
SymSym
 
SymSym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cruise at 70mph. I use Mazda Rotary Oil in the motor and use 95 octane (Aus). This I think is equivalent to 93 in the USA. Drive it hard for fun at times but usually have a gentle R foot. I find that the heavier your R foot, the worse the fuel economy.
Old 03-06-2007, 04:19 PM
  #24  
Anatomy of a corner...
 
fullsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 536
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by musclecarconvrt
I get about 18-21 here in Middle Tennesse. Plenty of hills here to. I'm afraid it the gas in CA. Does all the Gas in CA have ethanol? All cars get worse gas mileage with that stuff.
Yea, I just read about this stuff:

California was one of the first States to ban the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) after it was detected in ground water. Ethanol, a non-petroleum product usually made from corn, is being used in place of MTBE. Gasoline without MTBE is more expensive to produce and requires refineries to change the way they produce and distribute gasoline. Some supply dislocations and price surges occurred in the summer of 2003 as the State moved away from MTBE. Similar problems have also occurred in past fuel transitions.

Plus, our special blend isn't supplied by many companies.

FS

Last edited by fullsmoke; 03-06-2007 at 04:25 PM.
Old 03-07-2007, 12:30 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
flomulgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does Australia use Imperial Gallons? That is different by a fraction that would make sense of 28 mp(I)g.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: How do we improve the mileage on our cars? A brainstorming session



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.