Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

engine cover functionality/uselessness revisited

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 10:17 AM
  #1  
ProtoConVert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
engine cover functionality/uselessness revisited

I'm still wondering about whether or not the engine cover is useful... especially in light of the ease of periodic oil checks.

Have any of you lucky owners noticed any rock dings on the top or bottom of the engine cover? Have you noticed anything else that might suggest it to be useful in the slightest?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
I can get the dipstick out and in just fine with the engine cover in place. What is the problem with periodic oil checks with the cover?

Regards,
Gordon
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:30 AM
  #3  
Shard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
I cannot see anyway it would be useful at all.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #4  
notdeafyet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: North Central Phoenix, Arizona
The engine covers function seems to be to hide the lack-of-engine from view. Car owners, and especially sports car owners, like to gaze at their "powerplant". However, in the case of the RX8, the freaking alternator looks bigger than the engine. The cover just hides this fact. The combination of a compact design and placement that is abmormally low and rearward makes for a less-than-impressive underhood hardware display.

The only other functions that I can imagine is that the cover may direct airflow for better engine cooling, or it may shield the precious hood paint from heat damage? For these reasons, I am leaving my cover in place. If someone can rule these out, then I would like to remove the cover for weight reduction (albeit negligible)...
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #5  
Sputnik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
I believe some folks have discovered that under the covers are fins that direct air to necessary places.

---jps
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 01:03 PM
  #6  
ProtoConVert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Weight reduction is NEVER negligible
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 01:07 PM
  #7  
Shard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
My friend removed his. Like 1600 miles with no problems. I mean it's plasic. It hides the engine like the z and everything else coming out. (minus my precious rex :D )
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 04:38 PM
  #8  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Can't comment one way or another on the functionality of the cover.

But I kind of like that you can't really see the engine. When I was still in High School, all the rednecks used to flip out over my TII because the engine was so small. I can only imagine what those idiots would say if they saw the RX-8. The size just blows people's minds.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #9  
Good Duck's Avatar
No more parachute
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
The first "mod" I did was to remove that cover. I did reinstall it to study its function. But all it did was trapped heat. The engine bay seems much cooler with it off. It's now a nice garage decoration.

I, for one, enjoyed showing off the engine and its small size. People who never seen a rotary engine are constantly amazed at its compactness.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jesus Martinez
Series I Tech Garage
44
May 6, 2025 08:09 AM
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
Nov 3, 2020 03:38 PM
ShadowDragon78
RX-8 Discussion
14
Aug 21, 2015 03:29 PM
ShadowDragon78
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
7
Aug 11, 2015 06:42 AM
MolecularConcept
New Member Forum
8
Aug 9, 2015 04:46 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.