Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Waterless coolant vs 50/50

Old 04-13-2012, 09:14 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Harlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay City Tx
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Waterless coolant vs 50/50

Ok, as an experiment I switched from waterless to 50/50 coolant. I'd been running waterless since replacing the engine, and wanted to track down some indications so I ran logs for a few days on a stock tune and swapped coolant halfway through. The results for cruising at 70mph after readings were stable:

50/50 vs Waterless
Coolant temp: 197 vs 206
EGT: Negligible difference.
Short term Fuel trim: .6 vs 1.7
Running vac: Negligible
Idle Vac: 22 vs 23.5

Although I will say that I didn't leave it running long to see if idle vac changed with the 50/50. I do know it stays about the same with waterless.

These are the conclusions I've drawn:
The internal temps for idle are directly related to engine vac, so the engine internals stay cooler at idle.

The engine appears to run cooler in cruise. I say that because the fuel trims did drop 1% going to 50/50 (hotter internals), however the EGT did not change. So it's a toss up.

What I will say is that running waterless is slightly better than regular coolant for actually keeping the internals cool even with the increased temperature, and it doesn't boil over so overheating is less of a concern.
Old 04-13-2012, 09:28 PM
  #2  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Thank you ... most of us knew that already

the only problem with waterless coolant is that ... you have to fill it with waterless coolant, you can't just top it off with water.
Old 04-13-2012, 09:54 PM
  #3  
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
StealthTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A Pacific Island.
Posts: 7,280
Received 172 Likes on 130 Posts
How is overheating less of a concern?

Surely if it never boils, the situation would just go from bad to worse?
Old 04-13-2012, 10:38 PM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
longpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 629
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StealthTL
How is overheating less of a concern?

Surely if it never boils, the situation would just go from bad to worse?
Steam pockets in the cooling jackets act as insulators causing rapidly and uncontrolled increases in localized temperatures. In addition to this catastrophic climb, there are also the pressure and other mechanical stressors associated with this boiling.

By preventing this, and as demonstrated in GT class racing where Evan ran insanely high compression ratios and much higher than normal coolant temperatures because even those elevated temperatures were controlled.
Old 04-13-2012, 10:59 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Harlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay City Tx
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Yup, departure from nucleate boiling is the concern. As soon as a steam blanket forms the engine can quickly overheat.

If you fill waterless coolant with water and have greater than a 60/40 mix you get the worst of both worlds. Specific heat capacity of antifreeze and the boiling point of water. If you go down to 60/40 or less then you are in the realm of a normal coolant system.

The only concern is that Evans is expensive and hard to get quickly in a pinch. So I don't run Evans. If you look at the Evans NPG MSDs it is just a Ethylene Glycol/Propylene Glycol blend. They can claim magical pixie dust and the like, but it is what it is. I've been running straight EG may go to a EG/PG blend.
Old 04-20-2012, 08:30 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
The cooling system in this car needs help. I have finally ( after some years) developed a "package' that satisfies all my parameters. More specifically, low speed/rpms and high speed, high load, high rpms enviroments. Cruise conditions have always been ok.
Waterless cooling is one way to compensate for an inadequete system, but even it does not provide all the corrections this car needs.
If anyone is interested in my findings and results of what I have done--drop me a PM.
Old 04-26-2012, 02:02 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Nadrealista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 668
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
olddragger please share you findings with us!
Old 04-28-2012, 07:22 AM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
PM me.
Old 04-28-2012, 08:30 AM
  #9  
Flame On!
iTrader: (4)
 
1.3_LittersOfFurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I run 30%coolant 70% water with a bottle of redline water wetter. Temps stay at 180-183 crusing. Ever since I installed that fan kit the highest my coolant ever got was 195, and that's in summer stop-n-go traffic with the ac on. Coolant system on this car seems fine to me other than the factory preset fan turn on temps.
Old 04-28-2012, 08:02 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
A big part depends on where you live and how you drive. Where are you measuring your temps from? The obdII port.?
Old 04-28-2012, 08:11 PM
  #11  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
I never had any cooling problem, NYC can go from 15 degrees to 105.

I have RB flash, Mazmart pump, and Knight Sports Rad (made by Koyo). no issues.

hottest I've seen maybe 95 Celsius ? Got those Readings from my Defi Gauge, sensor is right at the Top Radiator hose. Can't wait till Summer.
Old 04-29-2012, 04:15 AM
  #12  
Flame On!
iTrader: (4)
 
1.3_LittersOfFurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
A big part depends on where you live and how you drive. Where are you measuring your temps from? The obdII port.?
Yeah, obdII, I drive slightly aggressive usually.
Prior to changing my coolant and adding the fan kit my temps were +210 in traffic, that's to hot in my opinion.
Old 04-29-2012, 08:56 AM
  #13  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
another example of how important the fans are in DD.
Old 05-06-2012, 08:33 PM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
longpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 629
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OD, it seems your mailbox is full
Old 05-08-2012, 09:51 AM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
cleaned it up--just got back from the track--sorry about that.
Old 05-08-2012, 11:02 AM
  #16  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
another example of how important the fans are in DD.
I like clutch fans better than electric fans, too bad there is no space.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luiss7
RX-8 Discussion
54
08-20-2019 08:56 AM
Azki23
New Member Forum
12
06-27-2018 03:48 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 01:53 PM
drlubell
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
09-26-2015 11:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Waterless coolant vs 50/50



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.