Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Factory PCM knock control discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-29-2012, 09:37 PM
  #76  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
The timing retard value that we log doesn't care what the "source" was. If there is a value shown, then that is what is pulled from the calculated timing value.

Why can't you guys just go outside and try the experiment? Is it really that hard or do you just prefer to throw ideas around without having to be responsible for them?
Old 01-29-2012, 11:30 PM
  #77  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I did do the experiment, and yes there is a knock detection when hit hard enough.

but when my car pulls timing at 6000rpms there is no knock detection!!!

Last edited by FazdaRX_8; 01-29-2012 at 11:41 PM.
Old 01-30-2012, 04:24 AM
  #78  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
but when my car pulls timing at 6000rpms there is no knock detection!!!
How do you know it is pulling timing?
Old 01-30-2012, 08:45 AM
  #79  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,006 Likes on 1,635 Posts
some things just aren't meant to be ....

Old 01-30-2012, 09:55 AM
  #80  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
How do you know it is pulling timing?
The datalogs, that are posted in this thread....
Old 01-30-2012, 11:08 AM
  #81  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,006 Likes on 1,635 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
The datalogs, that are posted in this thread....
you continue to miss the point, entirely ...
Old 01-30-2012, 12:07 PM
  #82  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
you continue to miss the point, entirely ...
Enlighten me,

Btw I emailed you my timing map and u never replied....
Old 01-30-2012, 12:29 PM
  #83  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,006 Likes on 1,635 Posts
edit: apology my bad, sent you email

.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 01-30-2012 at 03:03 PM.
Old 01-30-2012, 06:57 PM
  #84  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
The datalogs, that are posted in this thread....
You show the timing being pulled, but you don't show anything that indicates it is knock. Because it isn't.
I already explained to you what is happening back on the 18th.
Old 01-30-2012, 07:53 PM
  #85  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You show the timing being pulled, but you don't show anything that indicates it is knock. Because it isn't.
I already explained to you what is happening back on the 18th.
Whats wrong with the IAT?
Old 02-10-2012, 03:51 AM
  #86  
Registered
 
oltmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
No - the RPM delta table is the RPM delta table.

Obviously, RPM delta is affected by throttle opening angle and rate, but it is not the same thing.
Those tables are looked up based on the difference between measured RPM and desired RPM. Desired RPM looks to be set by the the idle tables, or when off idle it is set to RPM itself. I don't know it this ever actually amount to anything like a delta. No reason to speculate though, you can log desired RPM with any scan software that has the Mazda enhanced parameters. If anyone uses Torque for Android, it is mode 22 pid 0x96e. Scaling is x/4. I broke my Elm327 dongle or I'd do it myself.

In any case, this correction seems to be mainly for controlling hunting idle.

Desired rpm isn't used for much else, but it also looks up base idle timing. I'm not really sure why you can cause feedback knock retard at idle, but it is tangential to the candidate issue. It does highlight one important point: 0.5 load is the maximum for feedback knock retard. This is mislabeled in my version of AccessTuner.

Meanwhile, one of the knock learning strategies only starts at 0.5 load. There are also IAT limits for this stuff, so you could probably disable the whole system by miscalibrating it...

I think we need a utility like Learning View to look at the learned parameters. If you're satisfied with what has been divined from crescent wrenches and defended with hand-waving, I have not a **** to give.
Old 02-10-2012, 07:00 AM
  #87  
Registered
 
rotaryPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe - Greece
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Did you see this as a change in timing or an actual knock retard value?
If it is only the former, than the knock sensor had nothing to do with it.

It is likely that you have bad IAT values being reported sporadically.

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You show the timing being pulled, but you don't show anything that indicates it is knock. Because it isn't.
I already explained to you what is happening back on the 18th.
What FazdaRX_8 have to show in order to indicate that it is knock and not just timing being pulled ?
Old 02-10-2012, 04:53 PM
  #88  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by oltmann
If you're satisfied with what has been divined from crescent wrenches and defended with hand-waving, I have not a **** to give.
At the end of the day, that is all that matters to anyone that is tuning these things.
If you are only interested in parametric masturbation, I have an equal quantity of ***** to offer.
Originally Posted by rotaryPilot
What FazdaRX_8 have to show in order to indicate that it is knock and not just timing being pulled ?
The actual knock decrement value, which he has already said shows zero.
Old 02-10-2012, 06:22 PM
  #89  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by oltmann
It does highlight one important point: 0.5 load is the maximum for feedback knock retard. This is mislabeled in my version of AccessTuner.

Meanwhile, one of the knock learning strategies only starts at 0.5 load. There are also IAT limits for this stuff, so you could probably disable the whole system by miscalibrating it...
so anything above .5 load would not be logged in knock retard?
Old 02-14-2012, 12:15 AM
  #90  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
? Bump
Old 02-23-2012, 09:26 PM
  #91  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been experiencing this very issue and based on all my available data, the knock sensor is the culprit.

Looking at the code oltmann posted, there does appear to be an error present with regards to the logging capability. If I'm reading it correctly, any timing retard value less than 10 will always show as zero. It just so happens the max knock retard value is -10.

I have been running a very conservative timing map so my issue would compound itself. The sensor would think it hears knock (due to unknown reasons), pull timing which would then actually create a misfire causing further timing to be pulled. IAT's were all normal during this time and the RPM delta tables were zero'd which did not solve the issue.

After reading a post previously made by Kane regarding the knock tables, I zero'd all of them and the problem has gone away. No misfires and my timing is being set to what I have in my base table.

For all I know I have a failing left motor mount that is causing the sensor to freak out.

I think the jury is still out on this issue but removing the knock tables from the equation completely fixed the issue for me.
Old 02-23-2012, 10:20 PM
  #92  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,523
Received 1,490 Likes on 839 Posts
Good work Flash .
Is this under boost or NA ?

I always limit the knock retard value by about half anyway and don't see any misfire either .
Old 02-23-2012, 11:11 PM
  #93  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I am keeping mine stock,

I mean if you flat line them all and you get bad gas, what keeps your motor from blowing?
Old 02-24-2012, 12:26 AM
  #94  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
Proper tuning
Old 02-24-2012, 12:44 AM
  #95  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Yeah, where do you get one of those?
Old 02-24-2012, 09:58 AM
  #96  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Good work Flash .
Is this under boost or NA ?

I always limit the knock retard value by about half anyway and don't see any misfire either .
This is under boost.

Something has clearly changed in my setup as I never had this problem previous to doing the Turbo rebuild. For all I know I damaged the driver side motor mount with all the moving of the engine and the knock sensor is picking it up.

While removing the knock sensor's capabilities might not be ideal, no one should depend on it to save your engine. With the sensitivity to knock that the rotary has it is very possible you would destroy something before the PCM had time to react in the first place.
Old 02-24-2012, 10:20 AM
  #97  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I have been looking into the mazdaspeed 3 ap, and knock stuff. Cobb gave up early on us. The knock sensor I think works fine, we just cant see what is acually reported. Other then logging timing and compare to comanded.

I do think that the kr system can save an engine from predetination, due to bad gas, that is why mazda has the system, incase someone put in 87octane.

The only way to get a "proper tune" for it is to tune with bad gas...
Old 02-24-2012, 10:50 AM
  #98  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8

The only way to get a "proper tune" for it is to tune with bad gas...
Not at all. You can build in safety margins within the tune to account for poor quality fuel. That said, the best thing you can do is ensure you use quality fuel with octane ratings that can be accounted for and stick with it.

I've made a habit of carrying a couple gallons of Xylene with me when I make road trips to areas of AZ that I know have crap gas. In the end, that stuff is cheap while engines are expensive.
Old 03-03-2012, 03:04 PM
  #99  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,006 Likes on 1,635 Posts
You could zero the table out for a test just to see what the result is just make duplicate map with the tabled cleared and do a simple back to back comparison under the same conditions. It doesn't get any easier than this.
Old 07-23-2013, 11:59 AM
  #100  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
cwatson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So, sorry to bring this up from the dead:

Am I to understand the cobb does not log knock retard because it has filtered out all values below 10? And our knock retard is negated? Is there a workaround for this? I was thinking of getting an AP but am not very comfortable tuning w/o being able to monitor knock levels.

Last edited by cwatson; 07-23-2013 at 04:07 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Factory PCM knock control discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.