Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

BHR new header and midpipe

Old 11-21-2014, 03:07 PM
  #276  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Boeuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Kinda. I will include a few pieces to allow owners of existing 3" midpipes to easily modify them to fit the header and offer it at a discount.
Maybe a dumb question, but for those of us with catted BHR midpipes, would it still work with the header and modification?
Old 11-21-2014, 03:45 PM
  #277  
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Lou
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Boeuf
Maybe a dumb question, but for those of us with catted BHR midpipes, would it still work with the header and modification?
I think there would be a space conflict as the collector is where the cat would be.
Old 11-21-2014, 06:16 PM
  #278  
You gonna eat that?
iTrader: (1)
 
BigCajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 5,988
Received 2,585 Likes on 2,107 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
As well, the rear O2 sensor harness would need to be lengthened and that does not usually bode well for the PCM (latency issues). This is a "race only" header as it does not have an AIR pump fitting and it will not be tested for emissions/CARB certification.
Good to know.
So just for a hypothetical discussion, if someone were to run this header on a mostly stock engine, what would be the result of running it without the cat OR sensor?
Old 11-21-2014, 06:21 PM
  #279  
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Lou
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by BigCajun
Good to know.
So just for a hypothetical discussion, if someone were to run this header on a mostly stock engine, what would be the result of running it without the cat OR sensor?
You didn't get the email full of information and fancy dyno scribbles? It's good stuff for your situation.
Old 11-21-2014, 06:40 PM
  #280  
You gonna eat that?
iTrader: (1)
 
BigCajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 5,988
Received 2,585 Likes on 2,107 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Just a 420 CEL. The rear sensor location is preserved, although rather pointless in practical terms.
Ok, thanks, I didn't see the bung & thought it was deleted all together.
Old 11-22-2014, 06:13 AM
  #281  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
DVerdeyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 199
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The wait is finally over and they're out! Good luck to anyone getting them, hopefully they're as good as anticipated! I've put some aside waiting for them, but $1625 is out of budget since I'm a student. Guess I'll just read about em and dream..

:frown:

Posted From RX8Club.com Android App
Old 11-22-2014, 08:43 AM
  #282  
Driving my unreliable rx8
 
logalinipoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alvarado, Tx
Posts: 2,051
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Charles, did you test them on multiple rx8's to see the gain
Old 11-22-2014, 08:44 AM
  #283  
You gonna eat that?
iTrader: (1)
 
BigCajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 5,988
Received 2,585 Likes on 2,107 Posts
I am pleasantly surprised at the price.
It's not as expensive as I thought it would be.
I'm also happy the gains mentioned are with the stock exhaust.
My main concern now is the sound, both tone and volume.
Is anyone planning on getting one right away?
Old 11-22-2014, 08:47 AM
  #284  
You gonna eat that?
iTrader: (1)
 
BigCajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 5,988
Received 2,585 Likes on 2,107 Posts
Originally Posted by logalinipoo
Charles, did you test them on multiple rx8's to see the gain
His description says "a few RX8s with similar gains".

Any first impressions?
Old 11-22-2014, 09:06 AM
  #285  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
I just bought couple grand of stuff so I might hold this until December or Next Jan before I can get it.

**** I'm so excited now.
Old 11-22-2014, 09:21 AM
  #286  
You gonna eat that?
iTrader: (1)
 
BigCajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 5,988
Received 2,585 Likes on 2,107 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
I just bought couple grand of stuff so I might hold this until December or Next Jan before I can get it.

**** I'm so excited now.
Yeah, me too.
I'm going to wait a few months at least for reports of sound quality, and see if anyone has any negative experiences.
Old 11-22-2014, 03:11 PM
  #287  
Driving my unreliable rx8
 
logalinipoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alvarado, Tx
Posts: 2,051
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Yes, and I have others still in the field being tested in various circumstances. I released the header now because I am confident of the performance I have seen, so far, and I anticipate even better news from my remaining field-testers.
Sounds good man, if it would fit with my turbo id consider it. Fingers crossed ill pickup a used one for a good price and put a 3" flange for my turbo down pipe.
Old 11-22-2014, 11:11 PM
  #288  
Registered
 
noredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Congrats to BHR! I must ask, are there any issues with heat? I would imagine that puts out more heat than the poopy stock manifold. Also (maybe I missed it) but what is the weight comparison to the stock manifold/cat assembly?
Old 11-23-2014, 07:53 AM
  #289  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
No rush, Homie, BHR ain't going away anytime soon. ;-)
Yes Sir, I will get one asap

oh, have you got my email?
Old 11-23-2014, 09:58 PM
  #290  
Function + Form
 
N0P1st0ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Yorktown, Va
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great job Charles! I do have one question thou. I read the product description and i couldn't find a definite answer to if this will bolt onto an existing midpipe? Such as racing beat, turbo xs, BHR or the OEM? Maybe its just not in perspective but the midpipe offered with the header looks smaller than a regular midpipe. Thanks. i apologize for my ignorance haha.
Old 11-23-2014, 10:10 PM
  #291  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Jesus, what is so hard to understand about the midpipe? No it won't bolt up to your existing midpipe.
Old 11-23-2014, 10:10 PM
  #292  
You gonna eat that?
iTrader: (1)
 
BigCajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 5,988
Received 2,585 Likes on 2,107 Posts
Originally Posted by N0P1st0ns
Great job Charles! I do have one question thou. I read the product description and i couldn't find a definite answer to if this will bolt onto an existing midpipe? Such as racing beat, turbo xs, BHR or the OEM? Maybe its just not in perspective but the midpipe offered with the header looks smaller than a regular midpipe. Thanks. i apologize for my ignorance haha.
In case he's busy & can't reply, it won't.
There is an option to buy it without the short midpipe for $100 less, but it would have to be a modified midpipe to fit.
Old 11-24-2014, 06:12 PM
  #293  
Function + Form
 
N0P1st0ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Yorktown, Va
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Jesus, what is so hard to understand about the midpipe? No it won't bolt up to your existing midpipe.
No need to be a smart ***... Can no one have questions? Just because some people arent as knowledgeable as you, doesnt mean you need to sling around your little attitude.
Old 11-24-2014, 06:34 PM
  #294  
Registered
 
wackemandstackem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have read through almost this entire thread. I am impressed with the dyno numbers posted for the long tube header compared to stock. I am just curious if someone can explain the science behind why the longer tubes produce greater hp verses short tubes. Or is there something more than just longer tubes?
Old 11-24-2014, 07:17 PM
  #295  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 109 Posts
Originally Posted by N0P1st0ns
No need to be a smart ***... Can no one have questions? Just because some people arent as knowledgeable as you, doesnt mean you need to sling around your little attitude.
The question keeps getting repeated in various parts of the forum. He is simply struggling to see why people don't connect the fact that this header is significantly longer than the stock header with what that does to the existing midpipe. If the header is longer, it means the output is moved farther rearward, which means that there is a shorter distance between the header output flange and the catback input flange. Even half an inch would cause fitment problems, and this header appears to be significantly longer, perhaps 12-18 inches longer. So a 3ft midpipe can't fit in a 2ft space (or whatever the resulting measurements are). As a result, two of the header options for purchase also include the shorty midpipe to finish the distance to the catback flange, replacing the existing midpipe/cat/whatever.

Originally Posted by wackemandstackem
I have read through almost this entire thread. I am impressed with the dyno numbers posted for the long tube header compared to stock. I am just curious if someone can explain the science behind why the longer tubes produce greater hp verses short tubes. Or is there something more than just longer tubes?
The exact science isn't 100% known. If it was public knowledge, than there would have been a header this successful before now.

Charles has indicated that there have been many iterations, and that each change he made to it produced a change in the output, including a few times he has noted that "one change made produced as much more gain as other popular headers have in total." Presumably this one change is not the length of the header, though it may be.

I doubt that Charles will publish the exact R+D he spent his time and money on, so you may never get a straight answer as it is unlikely that anyone else will take the time, trouble, and cost to figure it out and then publish free of charge.

Last edited by RIWWP; 11-24-2014 at 07:19 PM.
Old 11-24-2014, 08:00 PM
  #296  
Registered
 
wackemandstackem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't expect to learn trade secrets about this particular header design. I am more curious as to how Exhaust scavenging is different between different lengths of headers. I do notice that the collector is longer than most with a nice taper, which almost always moves more exhaust. I wonder how the absence of the air pump feed rail effects flow. I suspect exhaust turbulence happens on aftermarket headers as some gases travel from port to port.
Old 11-24-2014, 08:02 PM
  #297  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by wackemandstackem
I have read through almost this entire thread. I am impressed with the dyno numbers posted for the long tube header compared to stock. I am just curious if someone can explain the science behind why the longer tubes produce greater hp verses short tubes. Or is there something more than just longer tubes?
Google has your answer

not trying to be a Smart *** like 9K (*cough*lol*cough*) , but seriously, u can find answer(S) by a simple google search, u are not gonna get 100% what you need to know, but it will give u a general idea why is this happening.
Old 11-24-2014, 09:09 PM
  #298  
Function + Form
 
N0P1st0ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Yorktown, Va
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you, i understand it now. it just wasn't all put together in my head. Thank you for your mature response.
Old 11-24-2014, 09:24 PM
  #299  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 109 Posts
Originally Posted by wackemandstackem
I am more curious as to how Exhaust scavenging is different between different lengths of headers.
Traditional rotary wisdom is that there "is no scavenging on rotaries". However, that being said, it is possible that Charles found something with the overall length, and the equal length of all 3 runners, that does actually leverage resonance and pressure differentials to assist in exhaust evacuation.

Note that I'm not saying that scavenging exists, merely that I am open to conventional wisdom being wrong
Old 11-24-2014, 10:42 PM
  #300  
skc
rev it up
 
skc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,590
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Is the exhaust pipe diameter in the long tube bigger than the short tube versions?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: BHR new header and midpipe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.