Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

350Z's and WRX's make me mad!!!!

Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #176  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
PkSkull, I've also seen the WRX reviewed at 6 seconds and the 8 reviewed at 5.9. Does that mean the 8 is faster?

As far as you owning both, did you race both of them at the same time with you in each car? Well no, seeing as there's only one of you. So again, there's no way to tell. You may "feel" like the WRX is faster, but that's just because of the nature of the rotary engine...it never "feels" like it's accelerating very fast.

http://www.forbes.com/2001/03/12/0312test2.html

Last edited by khtm; Jul 7, 2005 at 03:11 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:21 PM
  #177  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
PkSkull, I've also seen the WRX reviewed at 6 seconds and the 8 reviewed at 5.9. Does that mean the 8 is faster?

As far as you owning both, did you race both of them at the same time with you in each car? Well no, seeing as there's only one of you. So again, there's no way to tell. You may "feel" like the WRX is faster, but that's just because of the nature of the rotary engine...it never "feels" like it's accelerating very fast.

http://www.forbes.com/2001/03/12/0312test2.html
Was it in the same mag? Different mags use different techniques. I will say this, its close, but its a lot easier to achieve a good start in the WRX than in the 8. 7k launches are a great way to ruin your car.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #178  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
^ I agree about the clutch drops. I'm just trying to defend Broker's position, and am glad that you admitted it was a driver's race.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #179  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
^ I agree about the clutch drops. I'm just trying to defend Broker's position, and am glad that you admitted it was a driver's race.

I never said it wasn't. Any cars within a second of eachother make it a drivers race. Heck on any give day you could beat an STI, becuase the driver sucks. Same driver, same conditions, a WRX wins.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:43 PM
  #180  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Ahhhh...too bad we don't live in that fantasy world though...same driver, same conditions.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #181  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
Ahhhh...too bad we don't live in that fantasy world though...same driver, same conditions.

Thing is...0-60 times don't require that much skill...just know how to launch and know when to shift...you'll hit 60 in 2nd gear...so not much room to mess up either.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #182  
Broker73's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
?

Niro you're putting the STI in the same class as the 8...yah ok??? Never even seen a comparison between the two...why...because they are very different beasts...correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't most write ups talk about the STI & EVO and draw the comparison as rally car knock offs....man dude give me a break....

then you flame away about the 8 only being .5sec faster than the RSX-s, yet if I give you the benefit of the doubt (hardly), the WRX would only be what, .2-.1 sec faster to 60...jesus......I am done with you.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #183  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
true dat, but I'm betting your average stop-light racer has trouble managing even that much
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #184  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Broker73
Niro you're putting the STI in the same class as the 8...yah ok??? Never even seen a comparison between the two...why...because they are very different beasts...correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't most write ups talk about the STI & EVO and draw the comparison as rally car knock offs....man dude give me a break....

then you flame away about the 8 only being .5sec faster than the RSX-s, yet if I give you the benefit of the doubt (hardly), the WRX would only be what, .2-.1 sec faster to 60...jesus......I am done with you.

RSX is a fwd...I'm still not understanding why you're comparing it to an rx8? That's something you rarely see if anything...

that's ok...this is all coming from a guy that claims an rx8 is faster then a wrx...so enjoy your fantasy world.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #185  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
true dat, but I'm betting your average stop-light racer has trouble managing even that much
I agree, it does take some talent to put down 2 good shifts at high RPM's
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #186  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Broker73
Niro you're putting the STI in the same class as the 8...yah ok??? Never even seen a comparison between the two...why...because they are very different beasts...correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't most write ups talk about the STI & EVO and draw the comparison as rally car knock offs....man dude give me a break...
so because the sti is so much faster, handles so much better then the rx8 it puts it in a completely different class...not even worth comparing to a slow sport car like an rx8 even tho' the cost is about the same...makes sense, thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #187  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Pkskull77
I agree, it does take some talent to put down 2 good shifts at high RPM's
I agree it takes some talent...but if you own the car and drive it daily...chances are you know how to drive it well. If you own a car, drive it daily and have problems performing two good shifts at high rpms...you need much more help...
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:20 PM
  #188  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
It's not fair to say the 8 is slow, its a damn good car, and a ton of fun to drive. However, I do feel it is fair to compare the STI and the 8, their both sports cars. The reason mags don't bother is because their is no competition.

As far as cost is concerend, a GT 8 is 31,000 sticker. You can get it cheaper, but thats only because the car is not selling well. Therefore there is about a 3 g difference in price. If you want power the STI is a much better purchase, if you don't care about speed and want refienment go for the 8. That decision is all about personal prefence.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #189  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Niro
so because the sti is so much faster, handles so much better then the rx8 it puts it in a completely different class...not even worth comparing to a slow sport car like an rx8 even tho' the cost is about the same...makes sense, thanks.
In Canada, the 8 starts at $36K whereas the STi starts at $47K...not close by my book.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #190  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Pkskull77
It's not fair to say the 8 is slow, its a damn good car, and a ton of fun to drive. However, I do feel it is fair to compare the STI and the 8, their both sports cars. The reason mags don't bother is because their is no competition.

As far as cost is concerend, a GT 8 is 31,000 sticker. You can get it cheaper, but thats only because the car is not selling well. Therefore there is about a 3 g difference in price. If you want power the STI is a much better purchase, if you don't care about speed and want refienment go for the 8. That decision is all about personal prefence.
I was exagerating about it being slow overall...it's very slow in comparison to the sti, which was the point I was trying to get across.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #191  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
In Canada, the 8 starts at $36K whereas the STi starts at $47K...not close by my book.
In america...the difference is 3-4k...that's close by my book.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #192  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
In Canada, the 8 starts at $36K whereas the STi starts at $47K...not close by my book.
It's not fair to compare the base mode RX-8 to an STI, because there is only one SIT. A fairer comparision is the GT to the STI.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #193  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Niro
In america...the difference is 3-4k...that's close by my book.
From their respective websites:

STi: $32,445 USD
RX-8: $25,935 USD

Yeah, that's about 3-4K
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #194  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
From their respective websites:

STi: $32,445 USD
RX-8: $25,935 USD

Yeah, that's about 3-4K
Base model 8, but once again thats not a fair comparision.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #195  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Pkskull77
It's not fair to compare the base mode RX-8 to an STI, because there is only one SIT. A fairer comparision is the GT to the STI.
Hey, I'm just stating the facts. RX-8 base is way cheaper than STi base. RX-8 fully loaded is way cheaper than STi fully loaded. If you want to compare a fully loaded 8 to a base STi then that's your choice but I don't know why anybody would want to do that.

Anybody in the market for one fully loaded car is probably a "fully loaded" type of person and wouldn't settle for the base of another type of car. Just my guess though.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #196  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
Hey, I'm just stating the facts. RX-8 base is way cheaper than STi base. RX-8 fully loaded is way cheaper than STi fully loaded. If you want to compare a fully loaded 8 to a base STi then that's your choice but I don't know why anybody would want to do that.

Anybody in the market for one fully loaded car is probably a "fully loaded" type of person and wouldn't settle for the base of another type of car. Just my guess though.
The base STI comes with a ton of things the base 8 doesn't have, therefore it is unfair to compare the two cars like that. The GT model is closer, as far as features go, to the base STI.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #197  
Niro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by khtm
Hey, I'm just stating the facts. RX-8 base is way cheaper than STi base. RX-8 fully loaded is way cheaper than STi fully loaded. If you want to compare a fully loaded 8 to a base STi then that's your choice but I don't know why anybody would want to do that.

Anybody in the market for one fully loaded car is probably a "fully loaded" type of person and wouldn't settle for the base of another type of car. Just my guess though.
First of all...that $25,900 you quoted was for the automatic rx8...so maybe you should try the base 6 speed...which starts at 27.4...add a few options (GT and some others) and you're easily over 35k...the FULLY LOADED STi is about 35k...
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #198  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Hey, the Auto 8 and Manual 8 are the SAME PRICE in Canada so give me a break! I just looked on the US websites for the "starting from" prices. Jeez.

I'm done here.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #199  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Originally Posted by Niro
In america...the difference is 3-4k...that's close by my book.
You meant in the U.S., right? Or are you forgetting about the rest of the little continent?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #200  
Broker73's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
?

Niro you are clueless...when did I say the 8 was faster than the WRX?? all I said was they were close to even.....then you switch gears and start talking about the STI??.give me a break....yah the STI will blow away the 8, and the 350Z, the base WRX to name a few....we were talking about the WRX RX8 Comp.....and I am sorry, but the fully loaded 8 is no where near the price of a fully loaded STI, or G35C, at least not in Canada. We start talking about one thing and you throw in another car (STI) for what purpose....I was just throwing names out there as far as cars in the mid 14's to low 15's for the 1/4, like the RSX-S.....yah it's FWD, but who cares, is the 8 AWD like the STI??? :p Jesus man, it is clear you don't own the car....in fact you probably own the WRX and just want to mix it up over here...best of luck......and once again, a fully loaded 350Z, G33C in comparison with a fully loaded 8 is not close in price up here...sorry.
Get a life.

You had to change topics because you knew I was right about the WRX and 8....and then put words into my mouth about the 8 being faster??...once again, and listen carefully this time ! all I said was the WRX, from a light and on the highway did not pull on me....so what does that mean??..do you want me to spell it out for you.....about dead even, or close to it.....have a good weekend....I am off to Mexico for a week.......TakeCare
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.