RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   RX-8 Racing (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-racing-25/)
-   -   Drag Strip (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-racing-25/drag-strip-31715/)

10000RPM 07-06-2004 10:16 AM


Originally posted by DKNYJoey
My Last Car was A Pontiac GTP too RedRx8Guy. Boy do I miss that torque! I was Pushin' 300 Horses in that thing! Can't beat American Cars with their Torque.
That is very true, but to make up for my lust for low end torqure I also drive a (Dakota 5.9L R/T regular cab) thats all that baby has is Torque :D a quick snap of the throttel and you got two smoken tire strips 20ft. long :p I hate to say it but my R/T kills my 8 in the strait line department but if the road curves then it's the 8 all the way. :cool:

SPD-FC 07-06-2004 03:20 PM


Originally posted by IZoomZoomI
lol haha yea i have to see that to believe it too. nt555? street radials? or track...
if he was running 275 nittos 555r (drag radials) he might have, all tracks are different so it is hard to compare

strangelove 07-08-2004 12:31 AM


Originally posted by RX8-TX
Don't you mean the other way around? A turbo would represent a terrible lag, whereas an SC would represent INSTANT tq from low rpms?

I've seen plenty of SC'd stook owners on S2Ki, very few turbo'd

because superchargers are belt-driven, they actually bog an engine down at first. most have a minimum required hp/torque number for the engine to even be able to turn them, but once it gets going, the FI kicks in and the supercharger works its magic. on a car with low torque numbers, high-boost superchargers aren't as effective as good turbos are.

RX8-TX 07-08-2004 12:55 AM


Originally posted by strangelove
because superchargers are belt-driven, they actually bog an engine down at first. most have a minimum required hp/torque number for the engine to even be able to turn them, but once it gets going, the FI kicks in and the supercharger works its magic. on a car with low torque numbers, high-boost superchargers aren't as effective as good turbos are.
Isn't a SC much more efficient at low rpms, given equal boost levels with a TC on a low TQ engine?

I know SCs have parasitic losses (PL) but, TCs have to wait for exhaust gases to spin up the turbine. Therefore, unless you are already at a high rpm level, the SCs parasitic loss would have to exceed TC lag in order to be a disadvantage.

Damn, now I am confused again: I understand that high boost applications will be a big disadvantage for both (TC & SC) because of the 13B's nature but, at low boost (5~8 PSI) which FI method becomes more effective?

IZoomZoomI 07-08-2004 02:41 AM

this thread might clear some things up regarding centrifugal sc versus positive displacement sc's...https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...t=supercharger

strangelove 07-08-2004 09:28 AM

turbo "lag" only implies that the turbo is taking along time to spool up. the turbo itself isn't hampering the engine. with a supercharger, the engine has added stress until it reaches a high enough rpm to spool the sc up to the point it's actually adding boost.

RX8-TX 07-08-2004 09:42 AM

Thanks for the link. I found RG's writeup on the first page. :D


Originally posted by IZoomZoomI
this thread might clear some things up regarding centrifugal sc versus positive displacement sc's...https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...ht=supercharger


Originally posted by strangelove
turbo "lag" only implies that the turbo is taking along time to spool up. the turbo itself isn't hampering the engine. with a supercharger, the engine has added stress until it reaches a high enough rpm to spool the sc up to the point it's actually adding boost.
Alright, I just read that Positive Displacement SCs offer full boost from idle to redline. Isn't that a benefit against a centrifugal (TC) FI method?

-8- 07-08-2004 10:34 AM


Originally posted by WTF no turbo
14.02 ill try to find the slip.No offence but if the cars you listed are accurate they all sound like high 12 to high 13 cars.Ive seen a sc s2k run a 12.53.
now the 14.02 was a 7500k bomb and i have 275 nt555 on the rear.

Yeah OK, maybe using your GTech Pro.... ;)

14s4doorNA 07-21-2004 07:21 AM

hold the traction control button for 7 seconds....... watch your tachometer

WTF no turbo 07-21-2004 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by -8-
Yeah OK, maybe using your GTech Pro.... ;)

Shit like this is why i wasnt going to post time.I wouldnt even begin to believe gtech times.This run was done at MIR Maryland International Raceway.I have the slip somewhere,but im in the process of moving so im not in a great hurry to prove anything to anybody.This run cost me a tranny which i also have the receipt for if you dont believe that either.Mods were b&b exhaust, midpipe, green filter and 275 nt555r with about half thier life left.I run nt555s 275 as my street tires.I have since ripped everything off the car and it is now my daily driver.Back to another fd and the 7 forums.Less assholes there.

Xyntax 07-22-2004 01:17 PM

OT: WTF no turbo, did you have the stock rims to go together with the 275s? Do they bubble out or look fat like some people say? I've seen a 275 on a yellow rx-8 but it had new rims on with it.

Tony Orlando 07-22-2004 08:42 PM


with a supercharger, the engine has added stress until it reaches a high enough rpm to spool the sc up to the point it's actually adding boost.
I was going to unload, but then I saw the post count....

A positive displacement SC application requires the throttle body to be relocated pre-blower. Therefore, you have maximum boost the instant you open the throttle. Superchargers do not "spool-up", and unless a Centrifugal is being used, are not RPM dependant.

This is one advantage of a SC over a turbo, and the reason why many engines with low torque numbers (Miatas, for one) benefit so much from them. The high end is already there, you simply fill in the bottom.

WTF no turbo 07-23-2004 01:40 PM

275 was on a g-games wolf 19x9

WTF no turbo 07-23-2004 02:31 PM

:confused:

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
B

If Ito can run a 14.32 stock why is a 14.02 with clutch,flywheel,exhaust,green filter and a 275 street slick so hard to believe? :confused:

























S


Ike 07-24-2004 05:54 AM

Ito didn't produce a slip either... Lets see if you can and prove me wrong and produce a slip, til then I think you're full of crap. Maybe even some proof that you actually had these mods on your car. The thing I just don't get is why when you made this run you didn't post about it, and why you wouldn't have a slip for what would be the fastest run for an RX-8.

WTF no turbo 07-24-2004 08:01 AM


Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Ito didn't produce a slip either... Lets see if you can and prove me wrong and produce a slip, til then I think you're full of crap. Maybe even some proof that you actually had these mods on your car. The thing I just don't get is why when you made this run you didn't post about it, and why you wouldn't have a slip for what would be the fastest run for an RX-8.

Ok assneck im done with you.I have posted pics of all mods done.Call rosenthal and give them my address 11 hidden cove ct 21220 and ask if they sent a flywheel.Have any more problems you can use that address for another reason.Come see me.Said i was moving and i believe i chucked it.Didnt think i would have to prove myself to a snot brat kid.

IZoomZoomI 07-24-2004 12:26 PM

i'm with ike on this one, if I ran a 14.02 the first thing I do to the slip is frame it :)

Ike 07-24-2004 04:54 PM

Blah blah blah, and where's the link to your post with all the pics of your mods? Besides, at best you maybe are getting 10whp out of those mods even if you did have them, that with the drag radials is not going to give you a 14 flat.

WTF no turbo 07-24-2004 09:11 PM


Originally Posted by IZoomZoomI
i'm with ike on this one, if I ran a 14.02 the first thing I do to the slip is frame it :)

After you drive a 9second car wtf would i keep 14.02 for.Honestly i didnt think it was a big deal when i did it.Now that this is a daily driver and most mods removed she will never see the track again.Personally Ike i really dont care if you believe me or not.

Omicron 07-24-2004 09:53 PM

That's enough, folks.

red_rx8_red_int 07-24-2004 11:23 PM


Originally Posted by Omicron
That's enough, folks.

Yep, might as well close Omi.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands