Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

SCC's review of the RX8

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-17-2003, 09:08 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rx7tt95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SCC's review of the RX8

Sport Compact Car has come out with a test of the RX8 and some interesting information regarding the numbers produced by numerous U.S. based magazines. Apparently, the high speed power port (6250 switch point) was getting stuck on all of the media test mules, essentially limiting the engine to the "standard" hp numbers, about 40hp down on where it should be. They expect acceleration numbers to improve dramatically. Once the stuck valves were discovered, all the U.S test cars were pulled and returned to Japan for diagnosis.

Dave Coleman also had an "interesting" article where theories regarding the next RX7 are sprouted. 16B, direct injection, 300+ hp with more torque than the Renesis. Just his "theory" however.
rx7tt95 is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 09:20 PM
  #2  
M0D Squad -charter member
 
rxeightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now, would that not be just too cool if it is indeed correct? To think, all the driving at Laguna Seca, and the test drives by Car & Driver were done with a detuned RENESIS.

Could it be true? Anyone else heard of this possibility?
rxeightr is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 09:25 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
revhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is very interesting and good news, if true.

BTW..has anyone seen so many pre-production models of one car be tested this much?
revhappy is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 09:28 PM
  #4  
'04 RX-8 GT Silver R/B
 
Cylo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I smell rumour.
Cylo is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 09:34 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Hercules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you can email me the article... I'll post it up.

shayaanf@mazdaworld.org
Hercules is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 10:08 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
vipeRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
while I do think it would be cool if that were true, I find it hard to believe that both c/d and automobile magazine got the RX-8 to 60 in 5.9 seconds on a car with 210 hp ... but then again ... the SRT-4 can do it in about 5.6 with 215 ... . Still, the Neon has more torque than the RX-8. Maybe the valve problem was fixed before those two magazines tested it.
vipeRX7 is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 10:13 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
chenpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we need to read the article!! The wording of the article has to be taken into account. Personally, I think 0-60 at 5.9 sounds about right, but you never know. Anyways, to qoute the thread starter:

"Sport Compact Car has come out with a test of the RX8 and some interesting information regarding the numbers produced by numerous U.S. based magazines."

From this, I take it that all the mags were using the detuned RX8. Again, from the numbers I find that hard to believe, but you never know....
chenpin is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 10:32 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Elara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting- think I'll be stopping by Borders tomorrow morning...
Elara is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 10:32 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Hercules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Elara
Interesting- think I'll be stopping by Borders tomorrow morning...
Ditto
Hercules is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 10:34 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Hercules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'll say this much at least... Sport Compact Car is one of the few mag's that puts a Dyno in a lot of their reviews...

So maybe it's a good sign? I don't care one way or another really... the RX-8's fast enough for me right now, faster for the same money? I wouldn't complain

But I'm not prayin for it either.
Hercules is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 11:53 PM
  #11  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
WHAT?

stuck 5th/6th ports? AGAIN???

this is like deja vu all over again!!!!

my FC's 5th/6th ports were stuck, got it fixed and now the bastard PULLS like a ***** 6000rpm+ :D

damn Mazda and their stuck 5th/6th ports!!!






J/K of course :D
ZoomZoomH is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 12:24 AM
  #12  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ZoomZoomH
my FC's 5th/6th ports were stuck, got it fixed and now the bastard PULLS like a ***** 6000rpm+ :D
:D word.

... seriously though, i'd be suspicious of SCC uncovering something like this, then ALL the cars get SHIPPED BACK TO JAPAN for analysis?? wtf is that?? american engineers "too stupid" to know what's going on?? only SCC... *rolleyes*

... not to mention that the tertiary (5+6th ports) aren't JUST rpm activated, or at any rate shouldn't be... makes no sense...
wakeech is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 09:38 AM
  #13  
rotary courage
 
m477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: SCC's review of the RX8

Originally posted by rx7tt95
Dave Coleman also had an "interesting" article where theories regarding the next RX7 are sprouted. 16B, direct injection, 300+ hp with more torque than the Renesis. Just his "theory" however.
1.6L renesis would produce about 200tq and 310hp, which should be just about right for a 2600-2700lb RX-7. I highly doubt a direct injection version would be available here, as no other DI car has been able to meet US emmissions so far.
m477 is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 09:41 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rx7tt95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're (SCC) the only ones that threw it on a dynamometer. That's how it was discovered. Most of the U.S.-based magazines do not dyno test cars on a constant basis. Without seeing the power output via a dyno plot, one would have never known!

The engineers who built the cars are from Japan (I know, I have a knack for the obvious!) and thus, they're the ones that need to solve the problem. From a logistics and production standpoint, it makes sense.

And yes, I do have to agree, SCC likes to float their own boat and often gets/does things wrong. One reader blasts them for their project Civic, having spent thousands on performance, and of late, nothing but cosmetic upgrades. Only to get 157 wheel hp (if I remembered the number correctly). Their response was that's where the market lies and eventually this Civic would spank Porsche's around Willow Springs. It kills me. Kids buy stickers and huge rear wings (for their front drive cars no less!) because they can't afford the real power upgrades and because their friend did it. As we all know, speed costs LOTS of money. So they regulate themselves into making the car look fast or for the show scene. I was involved in providing a bit of assistance with one of their past project vehicles. They were doing EVERYTHING wrong and couldn't get any power out of the engine. Meanwhile, every joe public tuner was pulling 20-30hp on them. Their excuse? We don't want to do what everyone else is doing. We want to try something new....whatever fits, right? That's pretty much SCC's motto. They never seem to be wrong nor have any bias.

Media is media though. On occasion, I do like to read SCC, especially concerning anything rotary. :D
rx7tt95 is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 10:00 AM
  #15  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
which issue of SCC is the review in?

dang it I have to go to the bookstore to pick up mags again (just picked up 3 last weekend )
ZoomZoomH is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 10:34 AM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rx7tt95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL, it's the newest issue...can't remember what's on the front cover...yellow car maybe? Dunno...I'm a frequent "reader" at Barnes & Noble/Borders/Books a Million, they're all blurry after a while. See, the trick is to go there and just read the mags. That way you don't have to pay for them. But those $4 Cafe Mocha's really add up
rx7tt95 is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 10:49 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
confucious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming this is true, it begs the question: how would an owner diagnose this problem if it were to happen to him? If C&D did their comparo with an RX-8 with this problem and were presumably satisified with the power, how would an owner ever notice?
confucious is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 11:08 AM
  #18  
RX-8: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
 
Smoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one I saw recently is the one with some sort of three car comparo on the cover, with a White Skyline GTR within that group.

Is that the one your were talking about ?
Smoker is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 11:09 AM
  #19  
Prodigal Wankler
 
eccles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by confucious
Assuming this is true, it begs the question: how would an owner diagnose this problem if it were to happen to him? If C&D did their comparo with an RX-8 with this problem and were presumably satisified with the power, how would an owner ever notice?
I'm amazed that the OBDII didn't throw a Check Engine light.
eccles is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 11:11 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
DonG35Miata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sports Comact Car

It would have to be the one after the issue with the yellow car and "Skyline" on the cover.
DonG35Miata is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 11:12 AM
  #21  
Prodigal Wankler
 
eccles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by rx7tt95
SCC likes to float their own boat and often gets/does things wrong.
Wasn't it SCC who threw the Cobb WRX into a water tanker, inflicting $multi-thousands damage, only a few weeks before the car was due to compete at the Solo II Nationals?
eccles is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 01:59 PM
  #22  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally posted by DonG35Miata
Sports Comact Car

It would have to be the one after the issue with the yellow car and "Skyline" on the cover.
it is definetly not in the issue in don's link. he's right, i went thru that issue when i was picking up sports car international. nothing in that one.
zoom44 is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 02:31 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
DonG35Miata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the whole story is TREMENDOUSLY fishy. #1, I don't think an RX-8 with the top end of the powerband missing could hit 60 in 5.9 seconds. #2, if either of my cars was 15% down on power I'd sure notice. You don't think the engineers/testers/Mazda people in the USA and Japan know what an RX-8 should feel like when all the ponies are present and accounted for? I can tell the difference in my Miata when the A/C compressor is turned on, and that is probably a 10 hp drain at the absolute max. It's probably more like 5 hp. 40hp is a world-changing amount.

What's more, if the car wasn't opening up all the way, I doubt their would be the rush of power over 6,000 rpm that the magazines described.
DonG35Miata is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 02:41 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Hercules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by DonG35Miata
I think the whole story is TREMENDOUSLY fishy. #1, I don't think an RX-8 with the top end of the powerband missing could hit 60 in 5.9 seconds. #2, if either of my cars was 15% down on power I'd sure notice. You don't think the engineers/testers/Mazda people in the USA and Japan know what an RX-8 should feel like when all the ponies are present and accounted for? I can tell the difference in my Miata when the A/C compressor is turned on, and that is probably a 10 hp drain at the absolute max. It's probably more like 5 hp. 40hp is a world-changing amount.

What's more, if the car wasn't opening up all the way, I doubt their would be the rush of power over 6,000 rpm that the magazines described.
I agree..

However I will wait for results... I am happy with what the RX-8 is doing now, any added power or speed is just icing
Hercules is offline  
Old 03-18-2003, 03:57 PM
  #25  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rx7tt95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just went and looked at it again. It has a feature on Japanese street racing with a white S15 in the middle of two other vehicles.
rx7tt95 is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SCC's review of the RX8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.