RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   RX-8 Discussion (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/)
-   -   quick question (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/quick-question-87507/)

NotAPreppie Apr 15, 2006 12:55 AM

The higher octane numbers that you see outside the US are typically caused by the difference between rating systems. In the US the method we use to calculate "octane" PON (average of MON and RON) while MON or RON is used in many regions in Europe and Asia.

I use 89 from Wal*Mart since it's the cheapest around with their "Support Globalization Shopping Cards". They use 89/91/93, no 87 available.

\\Konig\\ Apr 15, 2006 12:57 AM

premium 91

JRichter Apr 15, 2006 01:10 AM


Originally Posted by yiksing
I assume you are not trying to be sarcastic here, I'm living in petrol paradise, it only cost $US 0.4 for a litre of 97 RON.

No not sarcastic, Just curious as Brunei is very oil rich (and I think tax-free).

Raptor2k Apr 15, 2006 01:17 AM


Originally Posted by MazdaRX8er
True, i'm barely getting 180 with DSC on. with DSC off 240 on full tank.

60 mile difference? That's pretty significant...

Argento Otto Apr 15, 2006 01:53 AM


Originally Posted by MazdaRX8er
True, i'm barely getting 180 with DSC on. with DSC off 240 on full tank.

Great. Not this debate again.

There is some post around here that convincingly states DSC has nothing to do with fuel economy.

Raptor2k Apr 15, 2006 01:56 AM

Would you like to point it out? If it's the one I think you're talking about, it was still debated after it.

Argento Otto Apr 15, 2006 02:00 AM

This one, post #13.

https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/how-many-you-drive-dsc-tcs-off-86881/

In the case here (180 vs 240 miles per tank) maybe the DSC is malfunctioning? And braking the car unnecessarily?

shakRpahX8 Apr 15, 2006 02:04 AM

1 Attachment(s)
....

Raptor2k Apr 15, 2006 02:11 AM

I'm just gonna have to try it out myself then. There's been numerous posts about gas mileage being better with DSC off, and yet, there's been many that have rebuked the possibility...I'll drive the way I normally do, hopefully I'll come back alive :lol2:

Paul_in_DC Apr 15, 2006 06:50 AM

I get about 240-260 with DSC on. If someone gets much lower (like 180) then there's something seriously wrong that they need to get checked.

yiksing Apr 15, 2006 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by JRichter
No not sarcastic, Just curious as Brunei is very oil rich (and I think tax-free).

Yes, its tax free except for the road tax which is still very cheap. Down side is you don't have a say in what the government wants to do.

The ironic thing is other than petrol, other oil products (actually all products) are difficult to obtain. There's only one shop that sells synthetic tranny oil and another for synthetic 2T.

yiksing Apr 15, 2006 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by Raptor2k
Indeed, and nobody can explain why.

Engine mount, plugs, clogged filters, fuel pump??? Sorry can't help

therm8 Apr 15, 2006 12:47 PM

89 in the cool months, 93 in the hot months.

MazdaRX8er Apr 15, 2006 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by Raptor2k
I'm just gonna have to try it out myself then. There's been numerous posts about gas mileage being better with DSC off, and yet, there's been many that have rebuked the possibility...I'll drive the way I normally do, hopefully I'll come back alive :lol2:

Yea man, try and let me know what happens eh? I know for sure I had hard time getting 200 miles on full tank with DSC on, but recently just couple days ago i tried DSC off, and i got 240. So I don't know what other people believe or have had different experiences, but im saving lil bit of gas with DSC off, well not rly lil bit 60 miles is good for you health!! :)

MazdaRX8er Apr 15, 2006 06:29 PM


Originally Posted by Paul_in_DC
I get about 240-260 with DSC on. If someone gets much lower (like 180) then there's something seriously wrong that they need to get checked.

Yea i thought actually it was my car eating up all the oil and burning all the fuel. So i went to the dealer to have the fuel pump and everything inspected, they said it was alrite, and told me that the fuel quality in LA, is what it was...
I kinda agree with them, cause of the shizznet they put in gas these days in CA. Besides that, my other car, FX35 is using up almost to the same amount of fuel as well. To think the Fx35 - and 350Z's having same engine, and my Fx burning 13MPG almost the same as my baby 8; makes u wonder bout the gas quality in CA.

Str8cold Apr 15, 2006 08:03 PM

Has anyone seen any difference in using the Ethanol blend AKA E85. Just curious since Kroger has signed a deal to use that at 800 fuel sites in Texas, it will be a little bit cheaper and wanted to know if anyone has run into problems with that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands