Funny rotary ad
Video is at: http://www.rotaryeng.net/boing21.avi
I got that link from this site here: http://www.rotaryeng.net/ Enjoy! Bodi |
LOL - that was great
|
:rofl: nice one
|
Lmaooooooooooooo
piston engines goes ...... boing boing boing boing |
Originally Posted by bd32322
Video is at: http://www.rotaryeng.net/boing21.avi
I got that link from this site here: http://www.rotaryeng.net/ Enjoy! Bodi |
absolute classic
|
Best way I've seen to explain the difference between a rotary and a piston engine. LOL!
|
lol, so this means never leave your girl the a position where you should steal your mazda.
|
Hilarious!!!
|
haha, i am so glad i live in the time i do, if i had to watch those commercials...haha
|
Originally Posted by youpey
haha, i am so glad i live in the time i do, if i had to watch those commercials...haha
Bodi |
LOL, That is very funny
|
Originally Posted by bd32322
I would love to see this ad now .. but not for the rx-8 - only if mazda comes up with a rotary sedan or something.
Bodi |
|
Hate to admit it, but I remember that commercial
|
The girl in the first ad (http://www.rotaryeng.net/boing21.avi) was very attractive. I must admit that I was hopping for a porno ending.
|
Got to love that - if it was reversed - I would leave her behind and take the 8. :mdrmed:
|
Let's see if the guys on the 350Z forum have a sense of humor? I'm going to post this ad on the 350Z forum. :ylsuper:
|
Originally Posted by ACRX8
Let's see if the guys on the 350Z forum have a sense of humor? I'm going to post this ad on the 350Z forum. :ylsuper:
|
I was expecting someone to say "repost" by now... :D:
|
I sure remember the jingle.
But I thought "Mazda engine goes whrrrrrrrrr." |
Originally Posted by Tamas
I was expecting someone to say "repost" by now... :D:
I don't think anyone had the internet when this commercial came out. :mdrmed: |
1.3L Rotary is considered a 2.6L?
I've read some threads where it is stated that the 1.3L Renesis engine should really be considered a 2.6L engine when compared to a conventional piston engine. The logic (I guess) is that each rotor generates two power pulses for each crankshaft rotation. I find this odd when thinking that 2-stroke engines have been compared straight across the board to 4-stroke engines in terms of displacement. That is to say, I've never heard of a 175cc 2-stroke called a 350, either by the manufacturer or 4-stroke competition.
In my simplistic thinking, displacement is displacement. Why should crankshaft rotation have anything to do with it? I say, Kudos to the engineers who figured out a way to get more bang with less movement. 1.3L |
That was a classic...funny stuff...
|
I remember that add and showed it to my wife and she rembered it too. Thanks, see if you remember this... it is BIZZAR!!
http://keith.miata.net/110S/index.html |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands