RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   RX-8 Discussion (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/)
-   -   Blown engine (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/blown-engine-143463/)

Shoafb 04-16-2008 10:37 AM

Blown engine
 
I just called mazda. The wifes rx8 Apex seal is shot.....:mad: ( bank 3 lean error code ) It will need a new... I mean... REMANUFACTURED!!! engine.

At least it is still under warranty.

Anybody driven the new MX-5? maybe time to trade?

2004 AT GT
30,000 miles

CTrx8 04-16-2008 10:54 AM

not going to get much of a trade-in value on a 2004 AT with a new engine.

alnielsen 04-16-2008 11:02 AM

I'm on engine #3. First 2 were from Mazda Japan. The present one, a reman unit, seems to be holding up well.

Shoafb 04-16-2008 11:36 AM


Originally Posted by CTrx8 (Post 2409851)
not going to get much of a trade-in value on a 2004 AT with a new engine.



It's not going to get any higher that is for sure.... and we only owe a little on it.



"I'm on engine #3. First 2 were from Mazda Japan. The present one, a reman unit, seems to be holding up well."

Exactly why I want to get out while the gettin is good.

rotten42 04-16-2008 12:40 PM


Originally Posted by alnielsen (Post 2409870)
I'm on engine #3. First 2 were from Mazda Japan. The present one, a reman unit, seems to be holding up well.



its like we're twins :)

Shoafb 04-16-2008 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by rotten42 (Post 2410052)
its like we're twins :)


How many people have had multiple engines replaced?


Thank god we are not upside down on this car.

I'm going to look into the MX-5 and maybe the 350z and get out while I can.

JRichter 04-16-2008 01:46 PM

Do all you multiple engine people have 2004's?

Raptor75 04-16-2008 01:46 PM

The MX-5 is a nice car and one of the most reliable sports cars you can get, small though.

The 350Z's next generation sounds much better then the current, may want to wait on this one.

Also I guess you haven't been listening to the Fan-boys here. Your engine didn't fail, it is all in your imagination.:lol:

Good luck.

mysql 04-16-2008 02:08 PM

I'm on my original engine. Dec 2003 manufacture date. Bought the car new in April 2004 with 7 miles on the odo. Been turbocharged for just a hair under 20,000 miles. 51k total miles.

MT of course.

Shoafb 04-16-2008 05:20 PM


Originally Posted by Raptor75 (Post 2410169)
The MX-5 is a nice car and one of the most reliable sports cars you can get, small though.

The 350Z's next generation sounds much better then the current, may want to wait on this one.

Also I guess you haven't been listening to the Fan-boys here. Your engine didn't fail, it is all in your imagination.:lol:

Good luck.


Ha... Yea, I'm sure she didn't drive it right and that is what killed it also. :slap:

New Yorker 04-16-2008 06:00 PM

Engine Failure!!!
 
Mazda had to replace the engine in my '99 Miata. ENGINE FAILURE! ENGINE FAILURE! Damn, unreliable Mazda!!!

lilring 04-16-2008 06:23 PM

yeah i have a 2004 AT too. and i just took mine in and im getting a new motor at 43,000 miles

puch96 04-16-2008 07:10 PM

get a civic...

YaXMaNGTO 04-16-2008 07:18 PM


Originally Posted by New Yorker (Post 2410632)
Mazda had to replace the engine in my '99 Miata. ENGINE FAILURE! ENGINE FAILURE! Damn, unreliable Mazda!!!

I remember that... I bought a 2000 Miata SE, but I was close to buying a 1999 10AE until I found out about the bearing problem. They replaced a s'load of Miata engines that year.

Rootski 04-16-2008 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by Shoafb (Post 2409813)

2004 AT GT
30,000 miles

There's your problem.

Shoafb 04-16-2008 10:17 PM


Originally Posted by New Yorker (Post 2410632)
Mazda had to replace the engine in my '99 Miata. ENGINE FAILURE! ENGINE FAILURE! Damn, unreliable Mazda!!!


Well, that was a mechanical problem the found pretty quickly.


How long has Mazda been trying to fix the Rotary?

Still trying, latest bulletin has them decarbing the engine.

How many more flashes did you go through on your Miata? How was the resale value?

Nemesis8 04-16-2008 10:23 PM

Sorry for you luck - I looked at the retractable hardtop MX5 the other day, she was a sweet car. I would go that route instead of the 350Zhit

Mazda should have never brought an auto to the market, who were they listening to? :spank:

Razz1 04-16-2008 10:27 PM

I would trade it in on the MX5.

I bet you can get a sweet deal. Plus there are incentives now.

Shoafb 04-16-2008 10:31 PM


Originally Posted by Razz1 (Post 2411160)
I would trade it in on the MX5.

I bet you can get a sweet deal. Plus there are incentives now.

Yea, I think my wife is sold on the Miata.

I can get the S plan through work, do you think I can bargain lower then S plan?

swoope 04-16-2008 11:02 PM


Originally Posted by Shoafb (Post 2409813)
I just called mazda. The wifes rx8 Apex seal is shot.....:mad: ( bank 3 lean error code ) It will need a new... I mean... REMANUFACTURED!!! engine.

At least it is still under warranty.

Anybody driven the new MX-5? maybe time to trade?

2004 AT GT
30,000 miles

bank 3 lean error code. that is a new one.

beers :beer:

New Yorker 04-16-2008 11:06 PM


Originally Posted by Shoafb (Post 2411137)
How long has Mazda been trying to fix the Rotary? Still trying, latest bulletin has them decarbing the engine.

Please… there's a big difference between fixing something that's broken—and making something that's good… better.

After 40 years, I think it's safe to say the rotary is not something that needs to be "fixed". As evidenced in numerous published, long-term road tests, Renesis reliability is about the same as other engines, if not better. Consumer Reports just added the 8 to its list of "Recommend Cars," which must be average or better in reliability.

Saying ECU reflashes—or changes in OMP design—prove that "Mazda has been trying to fix the rotary" is like saying auto makers' development of fuel injection "proved" that carburated engines were a poor design. That wouldn't be a fair statement; fuel injection—and thousands of other little improvements—simply made good engines… better. Get it?

Shoafb 04-16-2008 11:17 PM

[QUOTE=New Yorker;2411227]Please… there's a big difference between fixing something that's broken—and making something that's good… better.

They are making the Rotary design better by putting out a TSB to clean them all out?

What are they doing to prevent the problem from occuring again?

New Yorker 04-16-2008 11:30 PM

[QUOTE=Shoafb;2411242]

Originally Posted by New Yorker (Post 2411227)
Please… there's a big difference between fixing something that's broken—and making something that's good… better.

They are making the Rotary design better by putting out a TSB to clean them all out?

What are they doing to prevent the problem from occuring again?

The "cleaning" TSB is not to clean them all out; it's only to clean out those with reduced power or poor idling in hot climates. Why do you insist on making statements/asking questions that make it seem like this problem afflicts all RX-8s when, in fact, it doesn't? Do you work for Karl Rove?

fahrfegneugen 04-17-2008 12:28 AM

You are scaring me :scared: :tear:

Sorry for the loss though, get it fixed and keep it. You will put yourself through more trouble by going through the process of buying another car.

Detrich 04-17-2008 03:00 AM

hmm... is it the AT's that are more prone to blowing?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands