RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   General Automotive (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/)
-   -   Wards 10 Best Engines 2006: No more Renesis, but... (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/wards-10-best-engines-2006-no-more-renesis-but-78521/)

RX8-79 12-13-2005 02:04 PM

Wards 10 Best Engines 2006: No more Renesis, but...
 
at least there's a new Mazda engine in its place. Sad to see it's gone, and to see nissan's ridiculously overrated and overused VQ is still there.


Audi AG: 2L FSI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Audi A3)

Audi AG: 4.2L DOHC V-8 (Audi S4)

BMW AG: 3L DOHC I-6 (330i)

DaimlerChrysler AG: 5.7L Hemi Magnum OHV V-8 (Dodge Charger R/T)

Ford Motor Co.: 4.6L SOHC V-8 (Mustang GT)

General Motors Corp.: 2L supercharged DOHC I-4 (Chevrolet Cobalt SS)

General Motors Corp.: 2.8L turbocharged DOHC V-6 (Saab 9-3 Aero)

Mazda Motor Corp.: 2.3L DISI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Mazdaspeed 6)

Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.: 3.5L DOHC V-6 (Infiniti G35 6MT)

Toyota Motor Corp.: 3.5L DOHC V-6 (Lexus IS 350)

93RedX7 12-13-2005 02:09 PM

Ugh! I can't believe the Cobalt SS engine made it.

Brice-RX8 12-13-2005 02:57 PM


Originally Posted by 93RedX7
Ugh! I can't believe the Cobalt SS engine made it.

Exactly, there is nothing special about that engine. POS if you ask me, pretty much like all other GM products, except maybe the new vette.

BlueEyes 12-13-2005 03:01 PM


Originally Posted by Brice-RX8
Exactly, there is nothing special about that engine. POS if you ask me, pretty much like all other GM products, except maybe the new vette.

Why?

vrpirata 12-13-2005 03:02 PM

Rejoice!!! No Honda Engine :ylsuper:

Brice-RX8 12-13-2005 03:09 PM


Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Why?

It's just a 2L ecotech (or whatever shitty name they gave it) with a supercharger bolted to it, nothing special. Just don't like GM products one bit.

PoorCollegeKid 12-13-2005 06:13 PM

I'm surprised the LS7 didn't make it. Sure, the Ecotec can be built to crazily high power numbers for its displacement using catalog parts, and the Saab V6 is supposed to be quite the nice engine, but IMHO the LS7 is a more advanced engine than either of those two. Maybe there's a lower limit on the number of production units that precludes that engine? Not sure what else would keep it off the list.

therm8 12-13-2005 06:37 PM


Originally Posted by Brice-RX8
It's just a 2L ecotech (or whatever shitty name they gave it) with a supercharger bolted to it, nothing special. Just don't like GM products one bit.

Why?

:)

Personal bias is no reason for the engine not to make the list.

Sodium cooled exhaust valves, forged crank, forged connecting rods, all aluminum block, heads, pistons. I don't see any other economy performance engine touching it.

Sephiroth 12-13-2005 07:11 PM


Originally Posted by vrpirata
Rejoice!!! No Honda Engine :ylsuper:

:mdrmed: :mdrmed:

Good call.

BlueEyes 12-13-2005 07:25 PM


Originally Posted by therm8
Sodium cooled exhaust valves, forged crank, forged connecting rods, all aluminum block, heads, pistons. I don't see any other economy performance engine touching it.

Add to that over 100hp/L and a fuel economy of 24/29 mpg and it looks pretty good.

Ike 12-13-2005 11:17 PM

Yeah, I'd also love to hear a good reason why the 3.5L VQ shouldn't be on there (one of the most versatile and reliable engines on the market).

280RX-8 12-13-2005 11:22 PM

No doubt. It's got excellent torque, decent fuel economy, it's fairly smooth...I'm not finding a whole lot of downside. Exhaust note could be better. As for the Ecotech, GM's starting to make some quality shit. Guess seeing Ford knocked out of #2 by Toyota woke 'em up a bit.

RotoRocket 12-13-2005 11:28 PM

The 3.5 Liter Nissan is one of the best V6 engines of all time. The 3.0 Liter is none too shabby, either. Both rank right up there with the best BMW has to offer.

What's the objection to its inclusion on the list?

BRealistic 12-14-2005 12:41 AM

Hmm, interesting.


The Nissan VQ in 3.5 form makes very impressive power- but is a bit rough at high rpm. (starts to feel like a good ol reliable push rod...) but it is still am impressive engine for the price.


Isn't the Toyota 3.5 in the new Avalon too?


It's hard to get excited about the Audi and BMW engines, considering their price- they should be dayum good engines!

I am not familiar with the new 2.8 turbo GM/Saab engine. Hmm. Didn't Popular Mechanics give an award to a pushrod GM V6 engine recently?


The Supercharged Ecotec is interesting. I would be curious to see long term reliability and real world fuel economy numbers before I get too excited about it. I still remember the much talked about Qaud Fours.......


The Ford 4.6 is now becoming a great engine for the price range- just like the ol 5.0 was.

The new Hemi even though the Nissan 5.6 'Endurance' V8 is less expensive and offers better performance? Wow. Is this the one with DOD?

And mazda made the list with the Mazdaspeed6 engine. Hmm, makes me want to test drive one. When this new engine class first arrived, I heard stuff about how it was a Cosworth design that Mazda inherited to make production engines from, and how it could take very high boost. It will be interesting to see how this engines pans out.

RX8-79 12-14-2005 01:12 AM


Originally Posted by BRealistic
The Nissan VQ in 3.5 form makes very impressive power

On paper, anyway.


but is a bit rough at high rpm. (starts to feel like a good ol reliable push rod...) but it is still am impressive engine for the price.
Very rough. Sounds like shit in the process, too.
No matter which of the MANY classes they include it, there are better engine choices for similar money.

280RX-8 12-14-2005 01:30 AM

On paper? It moves the Z's fat ass with plenty of authority. I still don't see where you get "ridiculously overrated," and what comparable engines are you referring to?

Ike 12-14-2005 01:39 AM


Originally Posted by RX8-79
On paper, anyway.


Very rough. Sounds like shit in the process, too.
No matter which of the MANY classes they include it, there are better engine choices for similar money.

Sorry but I'll take the exhaust note of the Z/G35 over the RX-8 any day, I'll also take the horsepower...

Detrich 12-14-2005 02:15 AM

10 best or not, there's no engine that sounds as sweet or feels as smooth as the rotary to me... :) nor any that makes me actually want to turn the stereo down- just to listen to it hum... :mdrmed:

astro 12-14-2005 05:07 AM

vq engines sounds very agricultural to me. Doesn't sound exotic... more like a high revving tractor... my opinion. However, it has good low down torque... but crap top end... power tapers off quickly... some or most ppl prefer to have an engine characteristic such as the vq as ppl tend to use these engines for everyday city driving. Spirited driving with soul... nothing beats a rotary... VQ does not come close.... I am biased... but it's just my opinion.

Brice-RX8 12-14-2005 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by therm8
Why?

:)

Personal bias is no reason for the engine not to make the list.

Sodium cooled exhaust valves, forged crank, forged connecting rods, all aluminum block, heads, pistons. I don't see any other economy performance engine touching it.

I guess it is just personal bias then. It's made by GM, it will run for 40k and then have to be rebuilt.

Brice-RX8 12-14-2005 08:28 AM


Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Add to that over 100hp/L and a fuel economy of 24/29 mpg and it looks pretty good.

You are basing the 100hp/L on a FI engine, hell any manufacturer can do that, when you use that card the motor has to be NA. I don't like Hondas one bit, but the S2000 engine is impressive, over 100hp/L from an NA engine, same as the rotary - NA.

PoorCollegeKid 12-14-2005 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by BRealistic
The Supercharged Ecotec is interesting. I would be curious to see long term reliability and real world fuel economy numbers before I get too excited about it. I still remember the much talked about Qaud Fours...

The Ecotec isn't a new engine. It has been taking boost in Saabs for years without any major problems and it returned its rated fuel economy numbers in those applications. I would expect the supercharged version to be at least as reliable as the turbocharged version and probably return approximately the same gas mileage figures as well.

angelo350z 12-14-2005 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by RX8-79
On paper, anyway.


Very rough. Sounds like shit in the process, too.
No matter which of the MANY classes they include it, there are better engine choices for similar money.

Yeah I bet my piece of shit can kick your ass.

Ike 12-14-2005 12:43 PM


Originally Posted by Brice-RX8
I guess it is just personal bias then. It's made by GM, it will run for 40k and then have to be rebuilt.

That's nonsense, people said the same thing about the engine in the SRT-4 and it has proven to be VERY reliable.

rx8wannahave 12-14-2005 02:26 PM

OK...enough with the haters, gosh people you sometimes act like scorned woman remembering a past hurt GM or another American car company did to you which has twisted your view since. (we know...we know, at least a generation of crappy to OK products but show some mercy and give them a break)

No offense, but it's unfair to label all they do as "crap"...

The VQ is a good engine, while not very impressive in fuel economy.


I'm surprised the LS7 didn't make it.
Me too!!!! What in the world, I think those awards are bias to tell you the truth. How did the best dang V8 in the world (my opinion) based on power to fuel economy ratio, to say the least, get passed over by the just average 4.6 Ford?

I know I say this all the time, but 400HP (LS6 if I remember right) with 19/28mpg is just amazing to me and I have no clue how they passed over the Chevy V8 for that.

Then....then...they overlook one of the most unique engines in the world which makes ALOT of power for it's size and hits the stratosphere of rpm's, the Renesis...I mean....whaaaaa...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands