RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   General Automotive (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/)
-   -   Spherical Valve piston engines??? (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/spherical-valve-piston-engines-153387/)

MisplacedRotors 08-09-2008 10:34 AM

Spherical Valve piston engines???
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hey I searched and found nothing, here's a video for Coates Spherical Valve piston engines....pretty cool.

Supposedly they use higher compression like a 12 to 1 or more. with increased fuel efficiency. 30% more efficient. dunno watch the video. check out the website.

http://www.coatesengine.com/videos.html

Easy_E1 08-09-2008 10:38 AM

Now that looks interesting.

superglue 08-09-2008 04:22 PM

Where do you put the VTAK?

briann 08-09-2008 05:22 PM

50,000 mile oil changes...
&yeah, I want a VTAK with it too yo!

Socket7 08-09-2008 05:51 PM

oooh shiny. Almost makes me want pistons in my engine.

wcs 08-09-2008 07:16 PM

seems to good to be true.......

MisplacedRotors 08-09-2008 07:39 PM

no valve float at high rpms.... I liked the sound of that. Don't want the vtak kicking in yo!!! I've seen what happens there

NotAPreppie 08-10-2008 01:40 PM

Maybe the valvetrain itself is 30% more efficient, but I doubt that the overall engine efficiency could be improved by 30% with this.

MisplacedRotors 08-12-2008 08:36 PM

i really thought it would gather more interest on this forum than it has.

NotAPreppie 08-12-2008 08:57 PM

We don't need no steeeenking valves!

superglue 08-13-2008 12:42 AM


Originally Posted by MisplacedRotors (Post 2593873)
i really thought it would gather more interest on this forum than it has.

Why? It only works with pistons and it will probably never go any farther than being published in a few articles.

zoom44 08-14-2008 06:29 PM


Originally Posted by NotAPreppie (Post 2590553)
Maybe the valvetrain itself is 30% more efficient, but I doubt that the overall engine efficiency could be improved by 30% with this.


its with this plus 12 to 1 compression

RXallan 08-14-2008 07:24 PM

seems like a good idea.

after spending billions on their new electric plug-in, or hydrogen systems, i cant see any major automaker buying this patent.

as most, this company could sell their own engines for custom motorcycles

Socket7 08-14-2008 09:01 PM


Originally Posted by RXallan (Post 2596493)
seems like a good idea.

after spending billions on their new electric plug-in, or hydrogen systems, i cant see any major automaker buying this patent.

as most, this company could sell their own engines for custom motorcycles

Piston engines will be around for a long while let. Anything that increases their efficiency further is something auto makers would be interested in. There are also racing applications...

HeavyMetal699 08-14-2008 09:07 PM

This has been out for a while. In fact this is a repost.

As cool as it is, there has to be something holding it back.

gh8st 08-14-2008 10:30 PM

wow 14900 rpm...

StealthTL 08-14-2008 11:04 PM

Some inventors need to be SCHOOLED oldstyle!

In 1939, what do you think the great Felix (may he rest in peace) Wankel was working on for Dornier and Heinkel bomber engines?

Who guessed rotary valves? Correctamundo.

He saw how inefficient and wasteful it was to have these metal bits jumping up and down, then he looked down into the cylinder bore and must have thought 'ich kann besser tun.....' (I can do better!)

S

chickenwafer 08-14-2008 11:17 PM

I've heard of this before. I believe someone already retro-fitted a Motorcycle engine with this spherical valvetrain as a prototype. The problem is auto makers are so set in their ways it would take a major cost-efficient push to make this happen.

rglbegl 08-16-2008 05:01 PM

Fewer moving parts with a little better efficiency. . . . . . . . . . sounds like a good idea.
Better compression too . . . . . . . .


Why is nobody using this?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands