SkyActiv-X In-line 6 anyone?
In an FR layout :)
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...19bf965ec1.jpg use your favorite translator https://carview.yahoo.co.jp/news/new...627-carview/2/ |
I have driven an old BMW 325 with an I6 before. It's quite nice and smooth.
Mazda actually claimed that the I6 has about the same amount of torque fluctuation as a 2-rotor rotary engine. And the concept car that's on the same page... Damn! https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...80d2bba2fb.jpg I wonder which car will have this engine, though. Maybe an RWD mid-size car(like the Kia Stinger)? Looks a bit too big for the Miata. |
Damn, got excited for nought.
The patent was filed last year. It has to do with electric supercharging and the engine mentioned in it is a 4 cylinder diesel. Road & Track article about it I would have totally gone for an I6. |
There is another patent showing a inline 6 in front wheel drive configuration Was last year sometime.
|
that would be awesome
|
c'mon Mazda!
these 4 cylinders are cool and all but to really gain traction in the US market you're going to need something bigger to put in these upmarket cars you're starting to produce. |
I6 FWD sounds like a stretch. It's simply way too wide to fit in the engine bay.
Most of the mid-size sedan is already really wide nowadays with I4(T) or V6. Imagine having to make them wider just so you can fit a transverse I6 in there. Not feasible. An I6 also can't just be dumped in an FWD car designed with an I4. A V6 is better in this regard. I do like I6 a lot. Drove an old 325 before with an I6 in it and it's silky smooth. |
Originally Posted by UnknownJinX
(Post 4860332)
I6 FWD sounds like a stretch. It's simply way too wide to fit in the engine bay.
Most of the mid-size sedan is already really wide nowadays with I4(T) or V6. Imagine having to make them wider just so you can fit a transverse I6 in there. Not feasible. An I6 also can't just be dumped in an FWD car designed with an I4. A V6 is better in this regard. I do like I6 a lot. Drove an old 325 before with an I6 in it and it's silky smooth. Until we see some actual product or confirmation from Mazda, I still consider this an unlikely, but possible future. |
My opinion is this:
IF Mazda wants a bigger/more powerful version of 2.0 Skyactiv-X (assumed that final numbers of 2.0 will be around 190-195 Hp) an inline 6 ciylinder 3.0 liter makes sense. this leads to a RWD car and the overall styling of the latest concept. |
Originally Posted by UnknownJinX
(Post 4860332)
a transverse I6 in there. Not feasible.
|
If only.
|
Originally Posted by zoom44
(Post 4860391)
it's not for a transverse layout. it's for longitudinal.
There were FWD cars with longitudinal layout, but they were not very common. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands