New 95 RX-7. For real?
|
Wow
|
I did some more looking and found the dealer's site here. They're listing it as new at the original MSRP.
|
Even though it's "new" 37 g's is a lot to ask for a 9 year old car. Even if its a 7.
|
That $37k is the starting price and the reserve has not been met. Their website lists $40k, which was the original MSRP.
If it's still new, does it still have the factory warranty? |
Soon as someone buys it, it becomes used, and not worth any more than the other 9 year old rx-7's.
also, 9 years can do a lot of damage to things, especially when it's sitting around not doing anything. I saw it every year when i went from overseas to kansas and all my motorcycles had problems starting up even though the tanks were empty and they were kept on blocks. also, it's an automatic. |
Ya no joke... this makes me think... What is the stock horsepower on that car? I've only heard of the HP numbers on RX-7's modded.
|
what about any recalls or tsb's on it? I would assume none have been done. Imagine the look the dealer would give you when you you show up wanting the work done.
|
I think stock FD was 255 HP 217 torque
Sitting around like that things are bound to be wrong, however a lot of collectors buy cars like that and never title them, I know a couple of people with Vipers in their very large garages that have never been driven and never titled. |
Dealer lists:
255hp @ 6500 217lb/ft @ 5000 |
maybe the collector had it in a sealed temp regulated room. It could be perfect.
|
Originally Posted by Astor
I think stock FD was 255 HP 217 torque
Sitting around like that things are bound to be wrong, however a lot of collectors buy cars like that and never title them, I know a couple of people with Vipers in their very large garages that have never been driven and never titled. |
what i don't understand is, the second pic shows the window sticker clearly stating the car is a 5 speed manual. the photos show an auto though
|
There are some inconsistencies. The eBay ad lists the car as an auto and the interior picture concurs. The window sticker and the dealer website lists it as a 5sp. The window sticker shows that the car was sold to Marlin Mazda (the dealer that is selling it now).
|
It also lists the 4 speed automatic as a $900 option. Just a guess but I bet all FDs were listed as 5 speed manual and then if it was an automatic it was added into the optional equipment list.
|
Montego Blue/Tan and automatic has to be the least desirable configuration possible for the FD. No one was willing to pay $40k for it in 1995, and I doubt anyone will pay anything near that today. I bet that the dealer will eventually give up trying to find a buyer and just put it back in storage for another 10 years.
However, if the dealer had been smart enough in 1995 to stow away a silver r2 instead, there's actually a small chance someone out there would be willing to pay the crazy high price. |
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
It also lists the 4 speed automatic as a $900 option. Just a guess but I bet all FDs were listed as 5 speed manual and then if it was an automatic it was added into the optional equipment list.
(I didn't think to check the options, I don't consider auto/manual xmsn an option.) Edit: And I think MB/Tan is the best color combo for an FD. |
I couldn't find the 60/40 rear seat!
|
I'm with M477, I think it's just about the worst combo possible for an FD. I didn't like that color when it was new and I like it even less now.
|
That looks alot like my 93 FD--and you are wrong M477--they probably will get $37K for it because it is still nearly a collectors item. And Montego Blue/Tan was one of the best color combos for the FD.
|
The FD is hardly collectible and especially not in that trim. All it is now is a 10 year old car with really low miles that no one will be able to get financing on. Who the hell is going to buy a 95 RX-7 AT outright for 40k, even with 5 miles on it?
|
its too high of a price I agree. I had a 94FD, Vintage racing Red on black interior R2 with all the goodies. I really never liked the tan interior, and i even more so didnt like the red interior, never really looked good to me. I would love a "new" FD that has been un touched, but when comparing the price of that car to other 2004 model cars, i dont know if its worth it. or at least in that trim level, like everyone else said
|
What it fails to mention is that the car has never been registered, instead it was only used for track racing over the last 10 years. :)
The kms quoted are from when the motor was last rebuilt and the panel work is fresh because its just been resprayed. :) The interior is brand new because all the trim was originally removed and race seats were fitted. :) If it was a manual and if this was in Australia, I'm know plenty of people who would jump on it straight away. |
Originally Posted by JasonHamilton
Soon as someone buys it, it becomes used, and not worth any more than the other 9 year old rx-7's.
also, 9 years can do a lot of damage to things, especially when it's sitting around not doing anything. I saw it every year when i went from overseas to kansas and all my motorcycles had problems starting up even though the tanks were empty and they were kept on blocks. also, it's an automatic. |
Why would the FD be ruled out as a collector car? Who said it, Ike? Low production numbers in North America and a cult following aren't a bad start.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands